Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [   ] 

CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX:
Check the appropriate box:
[   ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[   ]Confidential, forFor Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X]Definitive Proxy Statement
[   ] Definitive Additional Materials
[   ]Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12Under Rule 14a-12

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX):
[X] No fee required.
[   ]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)Total fee paid:
[   ]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.materials:
[   ]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Formform or Scheduleschedule and the date of its filing.
1)Amount Previously Paid:
previously paid:
2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3)Filing Party:
4)Date Filed:
4) Date Filed:


Table of Contents


MAY 15, 2020

To be held at:
Corporate Office of
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360
Greensboro, North Carolina 27408
and at www.meetingcenter.io/287143514



Table of Contents


TANGER
OUTLET
CENTERS

attract over 181 million loyal customers each year. Our centers are the smart shopper’s ideal one-stop destination for the latest styles at great savings. Our upscale portfolio of outlet centers across the United States and in Canada, showcase a tenant mix of leading designers and brand name retailers.

At Tanger Outlets, we are focused on making our retail partners successful, year after year. We’ve built a solid brand name for millions seeking designer names at value. Our strong marketing partnership programs help promote the brand through optimized channels, ultimately aidingin creating profitable distribution opportunitiesnationwide for our retail partners and attractivefirst class destinations for our shoppers.

Our commitment to our partners’ ongoinggrowth and success is a reflection of how we dobusiness — always focused on the best interests and longstanding relationships with partners and shoppers.








Notice of Annual Meeting
of Shareholders and
Proxy Statement













May 20, 2016

Corporate Office of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360
Greensboro, North Carolina 27408



Table of Contents


DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS:

Thank you for the trust you have placed in us. As our 2020 Annual Meeting approaches, we would like to highlight a few important topics: Shareholder Outreach, Say-on-Pay Responsiveness, Board Refreshment and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Matters.

SHAREHOLDER OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

We believe that hearing directly from our fellow shareholders informs and enables the Board of Directors (the “Board”) to be a more effective steward of your capital. In late 2018 and early 2019, we reached out to shareholders representing approximately 80% of our outstanding shares and received feedback from shareholders representing approximately 60% of our shares. While executive compensation was an important part of our discussions, in some cases we also covered topics including strategy, environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters and Board composition. I led our outreach efforts, together with Thomas J. Reddin, the current Chair of our Compensation and Human Capital Committee.

SAY-ON-PAY RESPONSIVENESS

We made it a priority in 2019 to listen and respond to shareholder feedback on executive compensation following the vote received on our Say-on-Pay proposal in 2018. The Board strongly believes that our CEO, Steven B. Tanger, is uniquely positioned to drive shareholder value for a number of reasons, including his experience navigating the Company through changing business environments over more than 30 years, his intimate knowledge of outlet center operations and management and the industry relationships he has cultivated over the years. We place great importance on designing a compensation program that provides the appropriate incentives to retain and motivate him. However, to be responsive to input we solicited from investors following our 2018 Say-on-Pay vote, we made several changes to the Company’s executive compensation program for 2019:

Reduced the fair value of the CEO’s 2019 long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) awards by approximately 21% as compared to 2018.
Increased the allocation of the CEO’s 2019 LTIP award tied to performance to 60% (up from 46% in 2018).
Decreased the allocation of the CEO’s 2019 LTIP award tied to time-based vesting to 40% (down from 54% in 2018), reducing the fair value of the time-based award by 41%.
Increased the allocation of the 2019 LTIP awards tied to performance to 60% for all other named executive officers (“NEOs”), whereas the majority of the other NEOs’ LTIP awards in 2018 were tied to time-based vesting.

BOARD REFRESHMENT

In July 2019, we appointed Luis A. Ubiñas to the Board of Directors. Mr. Ubiñas’ appointment, along with the addition of Susan E. Skerritt in 2018, reflects our focused effort to refresh the composition of the Board and foster a diverse composition of its members. Furthermore, the Company’s three longest serving independent directors will retire from the Board at the end of their current term at our 2020 Annual Meeting.

Mr. Ubiñas is a well-known leader in the telecommunication, technology and media industries. He has advised CEOs of Fortune 100 companies and significant nonprofit organizations for several decades, including previously serving as President of the Ford Foundation. Mr. Ubiñas has deep experience serving on the boards of directors at both public and private companies.

ESG OVERSIGHT AND REPORTING

In October 2019, we released our third annual corporate responsibility report, reflecting our continued focus on corporate social responsibility and commitment to ESG efforts. The Board of Directors is committed to continuous improvement, and we have intentionally allocated primary responsibility for oversight of select ESG matters to our Nominating and Corporate Governance and Compensation and Human Capital Committees.

The Board remains committed to serving your interests, and we are focused on long-term value creation for all shareholders.

David B. Henry
Non-Executive Chair of the Board


NOTICE OF ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERSWWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM



Table of Contents


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OFSHAREHOLDERS

To be held on May 20, 201615, 2020

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.

3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, North Carolina 27408
Phone: 336-292-3010(336) 292-3010
E-mail: tangermail@tangeroutlets.com
NYSE: SKT

DEAR SHAREHOLDERS:

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I cordially invite you to attend the 20162020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. to be held on Friday, May 20, 201615, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time at the Corporate Office of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., 3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, North Carolina 27408, (336) 292-3010and online at www.meetingcenter.io/287143514. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/287143514. In light of U.S. Center for Disease Control guidance not to hold gatherings of ten or more people, we are asking shareholders to attend the meeting virtually at www.meetingcenter.io/287143514. The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

1.To elect the eight directorsseven director nominees named in the attached Proxy Statement for a term of office expiring at the 2017 annual meeting2021 Annual Meeting of shareholders;
Shareholders;
2.To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the  fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;
2020;
3.To approve, on a non-bindingan advisory (non-binding) basis, named executive officer compensation; and
4.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement(s), continuation(s) or  adjournment(s) thereof.

Only common shareholders of record at the close of business on March 23, 201618, 2020 will be entitled to vote at the meeting or any continuation(s), postponement(s) or adjournment(s) thereof. Information concerning the matters to be considered and voted upon at the Annual Meeting is set out in the attached Proxy Statement.

It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting regardless of the number of shares you hold and whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person.online. Please vote by internet or telephone as instructed in the Notice Regarding theof Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or (ifif you received printed proxy materials)materials, please complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it as soon as possible in the accompanying envelope. This will not prevent you from voting your shares in person if you subsequently choose to attend the meeting.meeting and wish to change your vote.

In light of possible disruptions in mail service related to the COVID-19 pandemic, we encourage shareholders to submit their proxy online, by phone or using your smartphone or tablet. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.

Sincerely,


Chad D. Perry
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary

April 5, 20163, 2020

www.tangeroutlets.com   WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

   3




Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARYi
PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS1
GENERAL INFORMATION1
Date, Time and Place1
Who Can Vote; Votes per Share2
How to Vote2
Quorum and Voting Requirements3
Revocation of Proxies3
Proxy Solicitation3
PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS5
Director Resignation Policy5
Nominee Qualifications6
Director Independence10
Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight10
Corporate Responsibility10
Attendance at Board and Committee Meetings10
Anti-Hedging Policy11
Committees of the Board11
Communications with Directors13
Compensation of Directors13
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation14
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION15
Compensation Discussion and Analysis15
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE40
2019 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE41
2019 CEO PAY RATIO42
2019 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS43
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT YEAR END 201945
OPTION EXERCISES AND COMMON SHARES VESTED IN 201947
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION48
Employment Contracts48
Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control52
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT57
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS59
PROPOSAL 2 – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM60
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE61
PROPOSAL 3 – APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION63
Say-On-Pay Responsiveness - Changes to the Executive Compensation Program63
2019 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS65
OTHER MATTERS67
Shareholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders67
Board Committee Charters, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics68
Householding of Proxy Materials68
Annual Report on Form 10-K68
Other Business68
APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS AND RECONCILIATIONS OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES69

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement and does not encompass all the information that you should consider. Please read the Proxy Statement in its entirety before voting.

2015 Business Highlights

Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term “Company” refers to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and the term “Operating Partnership” refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership. The terms “we”, “our” and “us” refer to the Company believes 2015 was oneor the Company and the Operating Partnership together, as the context requires. We anticipate that our Proxy Statement and proxy card will be sent or available to shareholders on or about April 3, 2020. Certain statements in this summary and the Proxy Statement are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the best years in our history in termsPrivate Securities Reform Act of operational performance. Among other achievements, our executive officers and other dedicated employees led the Company to realize the following results:

completed the development of and opened four new Tanger Outlet Centers, which expanded our portfolio of properties by nearly 1.4 million square feet in 2015, a 10% increase;

increased our Adjusted Funds From Operations (referred to as “AFFO”) 13% over 2014;

grew our same center net operating income (referred to as “NOI”) 3.5%, marking the 11th consecutive year of same center NOI growth (with an average annual NOI growth of 3.8% over this 11-year period);

increased our blended average base rental rates on space renewed and released throughout the consolidated portfolio 22.4% during 2015, compared to 23.0% for 2014;

obtained a 97.5% year-end occupancy within our consolidated portfolio, higher than any other public mall real estate investment trust (referred to as a “REIT”), and marking the 35th consecutive year that we have achieved a year-end occupancy rate at or above 95%;

completed the sale of six non-core outlet centers, including our interest in a joint venturethat owned one non-core outlet center, during 2015, and in January 2016, completed the sale of one additional non-core outlet center;

recorded a year-end debt to total market capitalization ratio of 32%; and

maintained a strong interest coverage ratio, which was 4.58 times for 2015.


In addition, we have two development projects under construction scheduled to open in 2016,1995. Forward-looking statements, which are expected to add an additional 707,000 square feet tobased on certain assumptions and describe our portfolio. As of December 31, 2015, our consolidated portfolio of properties was 75% unencumbered in terms of gross book value,future plans, strategies and we had no significant debt maturities until February 2019. We had $329.7 million, or 63%, unused capacity under our unsecured lines of credit, and our total market capitalization was approximately $4.9 billion at December 31, 2015.

Thanks in part to these operational results, we were able to return additional value to our shareholders in 2015expectations, are generally identifiable by increasing our quarterly dividend per common share by 19% (from $0.240 to $0.285), marking the 22nd consecutive annual dividend increase since we became a public company in May 1993.

While our Company generated a -8.15% total shareholder return (referred to as “TSR”) in 2015, we believe that the true value creation produced from an investment in real estate should be assessed over a long-term horizon. For eachuse of the five-year, seven-year, 10-year and 20-year periods ended December 31, 2015, our total shareholder return was 48%, 118%, 220% and 1,612%, respectively. Tanger also ranked third among all public mall REITs in total shareholder return for both the 10-year and 20-year periods.

Funds From Operations (referred to as “FFO”), AFFO and NOI are financial measures that the Company’s management believes to be important supplemental indicators of our operating performance and which are used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs,words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “will,” “forecast,” or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not measures computedlimited to, statements regarding our executive compensation program and creating long-term shareholder value. Important factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to those set forth under Item 1A - Risk Factors in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (referred to as “GAAP”). For a discussion of FFO, AFFO and NOI, including a reconciliation to GAAP, please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed2019, as may be updated in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2016, beginning on page 60.SEC. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Except as required by applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein, whether as a result of any new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise.

GENERAL INFORMATION

2015 Executive Compensation HighlightsMeeting:

The Compensation Committee believes that an executive compensation program that strongly links both the short-term and long-term performance of the Company and the compensation of our executive officers is a key driver of our long-term financial success. In 2015, the Compensation Committee took into account a number of operational and financial factors in setting compensation, including the successful results described above in 2015 Business Highlights.

The Company believes that our current executive compensation program represents a balanced, pay-for-performance structure that includes the following key features:

Focus on Company Performance: Despite our significant achievements in 2015, the Compensation Committee recognized that the Company delivered a -8.15% TSR for 2015. Accordingly, the total direct


4   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Stock Symbol:SKT
Date:May 15, 2020Exchange:New York Stock Exchange
Time:10:00 a.m., Eastern TimeCommon Shares Outstanding:     93,076,701
Location:     To be held at:State of Incorporation:North Carolina
Corporate OfficePublic Company Since:1993
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360
Greensboro, North Carolina 27408
and Proxy Statement

at www.meetingcenter.io/287143514



The Annual Meeting will be a hybrid virtual meeting, which will be conducted via remote participation by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/287143514. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online and ask your questions during the meeting. In light of U.S. Center for Disease Control guidance not to hold gatherings of ten or more people, we are asking shareholders to attend the meeting virtually by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/287143514. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need to review the information included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. The password for the meeting is SKT2020.

TableFor directions to the 2020 annual meeting of Contentsshareholders (the “annual meeting”), please contact our Investor Relations Department at (336) 834-6892.

Corporate Website:www.tangeroutlets.com

Investor Relations Website:investors.tangeroutlets.com

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON FRIDAY, MAY 15, 2020

This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2019 (referred to as the “Annual Report”) to Shareholders are available at www.envisionreports.com/SKT.

The information found on, or otherwise accessible through, our website is not incorporated by reference into, nor does it form a part of, this Proxy Statement.

VOTING ITEMS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

compensation

Page
Proposal 1Election of Director NomineesFOReach Director Nominee5
Proposal 2Ratification of Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our Independent  Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Chief Executive Officer (referred to as the “CEO”) decreased by 9.7% from 2014 and decreased by a range of 4.9% to 9.6% from 2014 for the other named executive officers (referred to as the “NEOs”). Additionally, approximately 83%2020FOR60
Proposal 3Approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the CEO’s total compensation is variable, or at risk, subject to the Company’s performance results.

Compensation of our Named Executive Officers (Say-on-Pay)

Focus on Shareholder Engagement:FOR During the past year, the Company engaged in significant shareholder outreach specific to named executive officer compensation. Not satisfied with just over 66% say-on-pay advisory approval at the 2015 annual shareholders’ meeting, the Company sought and obtained meaningful shareholder input on executive compensation and worked with its independent compensation consultant to change executive compensation accordingly. Specifically, we redesigned our equity compensation program to increase the portion of equity awards that are performance based,and we changed our 2016 Outperformance Plan (referred to as the “2016 OPP”) to reflect a 50/50 split between absolute and relative TSR hurdles. We are committed to ongoing shareholder engagement as part of the Company’s overall compensation philosophy.

Focus on Best Practices: In moves that the Company believes are reflective of best practices in executive compensation, the Company continued to include a mandatory three-year holding period following the applicable vesting date on the CEO’s share grants in February 2015 and February 2016. Additionally, in February 2015, the Company adopted a robust anti-pledging policy that prohibits, subject to certain exceptions described under “Governance Policies Relating to Compensation-Anti-Pledging Policy” on page 40, our executive officers, directors and employees from pledging our securities as collateral for margin loans or other transactions that could raise potential risks to shareholder value.

63

Executive Compensation Governance HighlightsWWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COMi


Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

DIRECTORS

We believe that the composition of our Board of Directors (the “Board” or the “Board of Directors”) is balanced, that the members thereof are diverse in experience, professional background, areas of expertise and perspectives, and that the range of tenures of our directors creates a synergy between institutional knowledge and new perspectives. As a corporate governance best practice, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually considers the composition of our Board and standing Board committees to ensure an appropriate balance and a diversity of perspectives.

In July 2019, we appointed Luis A. Ubiñas to the Board of Directors. Mr. Ubiñas’ appointment, along with the addition of Susan E. Skerritt in 2018, reflects our focused effort to refresh the composition of the Board and foster a diverse composition of its members. Furthermore, the Company’s three longest serving independent directors, Mr. Benton, Mr. Robinson and Mr. Schuman, will retire from the Board at the end of their current term at the annual meeting to be held on May 15, 2020.

Mr. Ubiñas is a well-known leader in the telecommunication, technology and media industries. He has advised CEOs of Fortune 100 companies and significant nonprofit organizations for several decades, including previously serving as President of the Ford Foundation. Mr. Ubiñas has deep experience serving on the board of directors at both public and private companies.

The below table outlines the ages, tenures, independence and committee membership of our director nominees for the annual meeting to be held on May 15, 2020. For more information about our director nominees and their qualifications, please see “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors.”

AgeYears on
Board
IndependentAudit
Committee
Compensation
and Human
Capital
Committee
Nominating and
Corporate Governance
Committee
Jeffrey B. Citrin625

David B. Henry*

71

4

Thomas J. Reddin

59

9

Bridget M. Ryan-Berman

59

11

Susan E. Skerritt

65

1

Steven B. Tanger

71

26

Luis A. Ubiñas

57

<1


Member

Chair

*

Non-Executive Chair


iiNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

The charts below show our current board composition, as compared to how our Board is expected to be composed following our annual meeting.

Director Independence Before

Director Independence After

 

Director Tenure Before

Director Tenure After

Board Gender Diversity Before

Board Gender Diversity After

Average Age Before 67.5 Years

Average Age After 63.4 Years


WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COMiii


Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

STRONG CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

Independence

Best Practices

9 of 10 current directors are independent
Independent Non-Executive Chair of the Board
All Board committees composed entirely of independent directors
Regular executive sessions of independent directors
Board and committees may hire outside advisors independently of management
Active shareholder engagement process
Diversity reflected in Board and Senior Management
Current Board includes 6 audit committee financial experts
Strategy and risk oversight by the Board and its Committees
Share ownership guidelines for executive officers and non-employee directors

SHAREHOLDER OUTREACH

We regularly engage with our shareholders, which we believe is a strong corporate governance practice. During late 2018 and early 2019, we reached out to shareholders representing approximately 80% of our outstanding shares and received feedback from shareholders representing approximately 60% of our shares. While executive compensation was an important part of our discussions, in some cases we also covered topics including strategy, environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters and Board composition.

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

ESG principles provide Tanger’s stakeholders with an additional perspective on the Company’s performance.

Transparent disclosure practices, governance and ethics policies, strong employee engagement and deep community commitment are all important factors for our enterprise. Our focus on Places, Partnerships and People demonstrates our dedication to delivering long-term value to all of our stakeholders including retail partners, shareholders, customers, community partners and employee team members.

In October 2019, we released our third annual corporate responsibility report, reflecting our continued focus on corporate social responsibility and commitment to ESG efforts. The Charters of our Nominating and Corporate Governance and Compensation and Human Capital Committees expressly reflect the Board’s oversight of ESG matters.

ivNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

CULTURE, COMMUNITY & RESPONSIBILITY

We continue to look for opportunities to integrate sustainability into our business practices as we address the material issues impacting Tanger and our stakeholders.

ALONG WITH GOVERNANCE,THE PILLARS OF OUR CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY APPROACH INCLUDE:

Places

Environmental Footprint

Practices that enhance and differentiate our properties while considering the sustainability of our business and our planet.

Partnerships

Shareholders, Retailers and Community Engagement

Mutually beneficial relationships with shareholders, retailers and nonprofit partners that facilitate improved quality of life for the communities we serve.

People

Customers and Employees

The long-term, trusting relationships with team members and the consumers we serve.

OUR MATERIAL ISSUES – ESG PRIORITIES AND IMPACTS

We begin with understanding opportunities and risks arising from the material issues that impact our business and inform our ESG strategy. It is critical to translate these issues into operational priorities and processes across the business aswell as within specific functional areas, focusing on globaleconomic, environmental and social impacts. The list at rightincludes top level ESG items that have been identified throughstakeholder, executive and board engagement and are priority areas for Tanger.

ESG PRIORITIES – MATERIAL ISSUES INCLUDE:

COMPANY REPUTATION
OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCIES
ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS
CULTURE
DIVERSITY & EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

What We DoWWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COMv


Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

2019 HIGHLIGHTS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Our approach is formed by our commitment to be a leading responsible company, using our expertise for positive impact. Our commitment to conduct our business in an ethical and responsible way is crucial to our continued success.

viNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate experienced and talented executives who can help the Company maximize shareholder value. We believe that we maintain a competitive compensation program that incorporates strong governance practices.

WHAT WE DO

Utilize an Executive Compensation Program Designed to Align Pay with Performance
Prohibit Hedging and Restrict Pledging of Company Stock
Conduct an Annual Say-on-Pay Vote
Retain an Independent Compensation Consultant
Seek Input From, Listen to and Respond to Shareholders
Mitigate Inappropriate Risk Taking
Employ a Clawback Policy
Employ a rigorous bonus program
Utilize Share Ownership Guidelines for NEOs and directors, with a 10x base salary requirement for our CEO
Since 2013, utilizeProhibit Hedging and Restrict Pledging of the Company’s Common Shares
Retain an Independent Compensation Consultant
Mitigate Inappropriate Risk Taking
Employ a Rigorous Bonus Program
Employ a 3-year “no-sell” clause for all time-based restricted shares or restricted share units awarded to the CEO, following the vesting or settlement date of the restricted shares or restricted share units, as applicable

What We Do Not Do
✗ WHAT WE DO NOT DO
Provide Tax Gross-ups
Provide Guaranteed Bonuses
Provide Excessive Perquisites
Reprice Share Options
Provide Excessive Change of Control or Severance Payments

SAY-ON-PAY RESPONSIVENESS - CHANGES TO THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

At the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, approximately 93% of votes cast approved, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, our executive compensation (commonly referred to as “Say-on-Pay”), and approximately 7% of votes cast voted against theSay-on-Pay proposal. This level of support was a significant increase from the 2018 vote, in which approximately 42% of votes werecast in favor of this proposal.

Say-On-Pay Approval Percentages Since 2015

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COMvii


Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

The 2019 Say-on-Pay results occurred after we made changes to our incentive programs in February of 2019 following an extensive shareholder outreach effort preceding the 2019 Annual Meeting in order to better understand our investors’ views regarding our executive compensation programs. The outreach efforts were led by Mr. David Henry, the Chair of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee at that time, together with the Chair of the Board at that time, Mr. Thomas Reddin, along with the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s independent compensation consultant, FPL Associates L.P. (FPL), and members of management (excludingthe Chief Executive Officer). We reached out to our 24 largestinstitutional shareholders who collectively owned approximately 80% (and spoke with and received feedback from shareholders who collectively owned 60%) of our outstanding common shares. These discussions allowed us to solicit individualized shareholder feedback on our compensation program and practices.

While investors generally supported the overall design and framework of our executive compensation system and acknowledged the positive changes that have been made over the years, in light of recent declining share price performance, we heard concerns and received valuable feedback regarding the magnitude of the CEO’s equity grant, and the portion of that grant that was not performance-based.As we value the feedback provided by our investors, the Board took action to specifically address their concerns while still maintaining a compensation program focused on retaining and motivating our executives. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes that the 2019 compensation changes described in the table below reflect our Board’s ongoing commitment to shareholder engagement and responsiveness.

Reprice Share Options
                              
WHAT WE HEARDHOW WE RESPONDED
The magnitude of the CEO’s grant does not align with peers, particularly in an environment of subpar performance.We reduced the grant date fair value of the CEO’s 2019 equity grant by approximately 21% as compared to the value of his 2018 equity grant.
A higher allocation of the CEO’s equity grant should be tied to performance-based vesting.We increased the allocation of the 2019 award tied to performance by approximately 31%, as now a majority (60%) of the awarded grant date fair value is tied to performance (up from 46% in 2018)
A lower allocation of the CEO’s equity grant should be tied to time-based vesting.We decreased the allocation of the 2019 award tied solely to service by approximately 26%, as now a minority (40%) of the awarded grant date fair value is tied solely to service (down from 54% in 2018).
The illustration below outlines the magnitude of the changes in the grant date fair value of the CEO equity awards from 2018 to 2019. For all other NEOs, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee also decided to increase the allocation of performance-based awards granted in 2019 to 60%, whereas the majority of the other NEOs’ awards granted in 2018 were tied to time-based vesting.

Given the operating results and share price performance achieved in 2019, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee determined that the CEO’s equity compensation should not be increased in 2020 and kept the CEO’s equity compensation, in terms of both grant date fair value and mix of performance-based versus time-based, the same as 2019.

viiiNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

www.tangeroutlets.com   CEO 2018 Equity Awards

Total LTI Award:
$4,598,606

=

   5Performance-Based (46%)
$2,111,479

+

Time-Based (54%)
$2,487,127

21% Decrease ($)4% Increase ($)41% Decrease ($)
CEO 2019 Equity AwardsTotal LTI Award:
$3,654,909
=Performance-Based (60%)
$2,192,945
+Time-Based (40%)
$1,461,964
No increase or change in allocation from 2019-2020===
CEO 2020 Equity AwardsTotal LTI Award:
$3,654,919
=Performance-Based (60%)
$2,192,949
+Time-Based (40%)
$1,461,970

CEOrealized paysince 2016 has been, or is expected to be,significantly less than the amount that was awarded (i.e., grantdate fair value) in those respective years, reflecting our pay-for-performance alignment. The adjacent chart isolates the portion of our CEO’s compensation that is based exclusivelyon shareholder returns (i.e., the Company’s three-year absoluteand relative Total Shareholder Return “TSR”). Of the total potential award value granted in the form of outperformance plan (“OPP”) awards over the past four years, in the aggregate, our CEO has earned, and is tracking to earn for those OPPs outstanding, zero value. We believe this reflects our consistentprogram philosophy of paying for performance.

Performance-Based Awards Granted Since 2016


WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COMix



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL INFORMATIONPROXY SUMMARY

2019 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

As of December 31, 2019, our TSR over the past ten and twenty years was 13% and 718%, respectively, and approximately 1,030% since going public. During 2019, we faced similar industry headwinds that many of our peers experienced, particularly related to several retailer bankruptcies and brand-wide restructurings, that resulted in the Company recapturing approximately 198,000 square feet in its consolidated portfolio during the year. With strong leasing execution, we succeeded in accomplishing one of our key strategic goals of keeping our centers highly occupied with desirable tenants. This success,along with our enhanced marketing programs that focused on growing our loyalty program and highlighting the social element of shopping by conducting portfolio-wide experiential events throughout the year, we were able to achieve better than expectedresults for same-center net operating income, traffic and sales.

We are proud of these achievements as they point to our ability to strategically position the Company to withstand these current headwinds. Among other achievements in 2019, our executiveofficers and other dedicated employees led the Company torealize the following results:

Net Income  7Net income available to common shareholders was $0.93 per share, or $86.5 million, compared to $0.45 per share, or $42.4 million, for the prior year.
PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS10
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONAdjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”)*19AFFO available to common shareholders was $2.31 per share for the year ended December 31, 2019, or $226.1 million, compared to $2.48 per share, or $243.3 million, for the prior year.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE41
2015 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLESame Center Net Operating Income (“Same Center NOI”)*42Same Center NOI for the consolidated portfolio decreased 0.7% for the year ended December 31, 2019 due primarily to the impact of additional tenant bankruptcies, lease modifications and store closures.
2015 GRANT OF PLAN BASED AWARDS44
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT YEAR END 2015Occupancy4597.0% occupied consolidated portfolio at year-end 2019 (compared to 96.8% on December 31, 2018), marking the 39th consecutive year with year-end occupancy of 95% or greater.
OPTION EXERCISES AND COMMON SHARES VESTED IN 201547
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATIONQuarterly Common Share Cash Dividends48Raised dividend in February 2019 by 1.4% on an annualized basis to $1.42 per share, marking our 26th consecutive annual dividend increase. Since becoming a public company in May 1993, the Company has paid a cash dividend each quarter and has increased its dividend each year.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS48
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS ON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROLAverage Tenant Sales51Average tenant sales productivity for the consolidated portfolio was $395 per square foot for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $385 per square foot in the comparable prior year period.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
55
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY INFORMATIONSame Center Tenant Sales56Same center tenant sales performance for the overall portfolio increased 1.5% for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018.
PROPOSAL 2 – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
58
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEEAsset Dispositions60Sold four non-core properties and used the net proceeds of $128.2 million to repay outstanding balances under our unsecured lines of credit.
PROPOSAL 3 – ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION62
OTHER MATTERSInterest Coverage RatioMaintained strong interest coverage ratio of 4.3 and 4.5 times for 2019 and 2018, respectively.
64Occupancy costOccupancy cost ratio for the trailing twelve months ended December 31, 2019 was 10.0%, lowest among the public mall REITs.
*AFFO and Same Center NOI are financial measures that the Company’s management believes to be important supplemental indicators of our operating performance and which are used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, but are not measures computed in accordance with GAAP. For a discussion of AFFO and Same Center NOI including a reconciliation to GAAP, please see Appendix A.

6   

x

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy StatementNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT 




Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

As of December 31, 2019, we had reduced our total outstanding consolidated debt by approximately $143.1 million from the amount outstanding as of December 31, 2018. In addition, we had no amounts outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit, which provide for borrowings up to $600 million, and outstanding floating rate debt totaled approximately $11.4 million, representing less than 1% of total consolidated debt. Approximately 94% of our consolidated square footage was unencumbered. As of December 31, 2019, our outstanding debt had a weighted average interest rate of 3.5% and a weighted average term to maturity, including extension options, ofapproximately 5.5 years with no significant maturities untilDecember 2023.

Thanks, in part, to these operational results, we were able to return additional value to our shareholders in 2019. We repurchased approximately 1.2 million common shares, totaling $20.0 million, during the year, at a weighted average price of $16.52 per share, leaving approximately $80.0 million available at December 31, 2019 under the existing share repurchase authorization. In January 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 0.7%, or $0.01 per share, increase in the annualized dividend on its common shares to $1.43 per share, marking the 27thconsecutive annual dividend increase.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COMxi


Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

to be held on May 20, 201615, 2020

GENERAL INFORMATION

The Board of Directors of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. (NYSE:SKT) is soliciting your proxy for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on Friday, May 20, 2016.15, 2020.

Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term “Company” refers to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., the term “Board” refers to our Board of Directors, the termterms “meeting” and “Annual Meeting” refers to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the CompanytheCompany to be held on May 20, 2016,15, 2020, and the term “Operating Partnership” refers“OperatingPartnership” refer to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership. We are a self-administered and self-managed REIT.real estate investment trust (referred to as a “REIT”). Our outlet centers and other assets are held by, and all of our operations are conducted by, the Operating Partnership. Accordingly, the descriptions of our business, employees and properties are also descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Operating Partnership. The terms “we”,“we,” “our” and “us” refer to the Company or the Company and the Operating Partnership together, as the context requires.

Pursuant to the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (referred to as the “SEC”), we are providing certain of our shareholders with access to our NoticeofNotice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement and proxy card (referred to as the “proxy materials”) and Annual Report forReportfor the year ended December 31, 20152019 (referred to as the “Annualthe“Annual Report”) over the internet. BecauseIf you received by mail a Notice Regarding theof Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, including aincludinga notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders (referred to as the “Notice”), you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you have previously made a permanentan election to receive these materials in printed form.form or make a new request. Instead, all shareholdersyou will have the ability to access the proxy materials and Annual Report by visiting the website at http://www.edocumentview.com/SKT. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the internet or to request a printed copy may be found on the Notice. In addition, all shareholdersany shareholder who received a Notice may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis.

The Annual Meeting will be a hybrid virtual meeting, which will be conducted via remote participation by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/287143514. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online and ask your questions during the meeting. In light of U.S. Center for Disease Control guidance not to hold gatherings of ten or more people, we are asking shareholders to attend the meeting virtually by visitingwww.meetingcenter.io/287143514. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need to review the information included on your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. The password for themeeting is SKT2020.

We anticipate that our Proxy Statementproxy materials and proxy cardAnnual Report will be availablebeavailable to shareholders on or about April 5, 2016.3, 2020.

DATE, TIME AND PLACE

Date, Time and Place

Friday May 20, 201615, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time

To be held at:
Corporate Office of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360
Greensboro, North Carolina 27408
(336) 292-3010
and at www.meetingcenter.io/287143514


Subject to any continuation(s), postponement(s) or adjournment(s) thereof.

ATTENDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

As part of our effort to maintain a safe and healthy environment for our directors, members of management and shareholderswho wish to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have decided to offer shareholders the opportunity to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting virtuallyby visiting www.meetingcenter.io/287143514in addition to hosting the annual meeting at our Corporate Office. You mayattend the 2020 Annual Meeting only if you are a shareholderwho is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, or if you hold avalid proxy for the 2020 Annual Meeting. You may attend andparticipate in the Annual Meeting by visiting the following website: www.meetingcenter.io/287143514. In light of U.S. Center for Disease Control guidance not to hold gatherings of ten or more people, we are asking shareholders to attend the meeting virtually by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/287143514.To participate in the 2020 AnnualMeeting, you will need to review the information included on your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompaniedyour proxy materials. The password for the meeting is SKT2020.

Who Can Vote; Votes per shareWWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM1


Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION

If you are a registered shareholder (i.e., you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), you do not need to register to attend the Annual Meeting virtually on the Internet. Please follow the instructions on the Notice or proxy card that you received.

If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, you must register in advance to attend the Annual Meeting virtually on the Internet. To register to attend the Annual Meeting online by webcast you must submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your right to vote your Company shares along with your name and email address to Computershare. Requests for registration must be labeled as“Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 11, 2020.

You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after Computershare receives your registration materials. Requests for registration should be directed to Computershare at the following:

By email

Forward the email from your broker, or attach an image of your legal proxy, to legalproxy@computershare.com

By mail

Computershare
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Legal Proxy
P.O. Box 43001
Providence, RI 02940-3001

The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. EasternTime. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the starttime. Online check-in will begin at 9:40 a.m. Eastern Time, and youshould allow ample time for check-in procedures.

WHO CAN VOTE; VOTES PER SHARE

All holders of record of our common shares, par value $.01 per sharepershare (referred to as the “Common Shares”), as of the close ofcloseof business on the record date, March 23, 2016,18, 2020, are entitled toentitledto attend and vote on all proposals at the meeting. Each Common Share entitles the holder thereof to one vote. At the closetheclose of business on March 23, 2016, CommonShares totaling 96,126,50718, 2020, Common Shares totaling93,076,701 were issued and outstanding. In addition, at the close of business on March 23, 2016,18, 2020, units of partnership interest ininterestin the Operating Partnership, which may be exchanged on a one-to-one basis for Common Shares of the Company, totaled 5,052,743totaled4,911,173 units. Units of partnership interest are not entitled to votetovote at this meeting.


www.tangeroutlets.com   

   7





Table of ContentsHOW TO VOTE

PROXY STATEMENT

How to Vote

Shareholder of Record—granting a proxySHAREHOLDER OF RECORD-GRANTING A PROXY

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you by the Company. As the shareholder of record, you have the right to vote in person at the annual meeting or to vote by proxy. If you plan to vote online during the meeting, you will need to review the information included on your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. The password for the meeting is SKT2020. Prior to the meeting, you may vote by any of the following methods:

ONLINE

BY PHONE

BY MAIL

QR CODE

www.envisionreports.com/SKT

1-800-652-VOTE (8683)

Fill out your proxy card and
drop in the mail in the enclosed
postage paid envelope

Use your smartphone or
tablet to scan the QR Code

If you wish to vote by proxy, you may vote using the internet, by telephone, or (if you received printed proxy materials) by completing a proxy card and returning it by mail in the envelope provided. Note that, in light of possible disruptions in mailservice related to the COVID-19 pandemic, we encourageshareholders to submit their proxy online, by phone or using your smartphone or tablet. When you vote by proxy, you authorize our officers listed on the proxy card to vote your shares on your behalf as you direct. Votes submitted electronically must bereceived by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on May 15, 2020.

If you sign and return a proxy card, or vote using the internet or by telephone, but do not provide instructions on how to vote your shares, the designated officers will vote on your behalf as follows:

FOR the election of each of the seven individuals named in this Proxy Statement to serve as directors;
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020; and
FOR the approval, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers.

2

FORNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT the election of each of the eight individuals named in this Proxy Statement to serve as directors;

FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016; and

FOR the approval, on a non-binding basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers.



Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION

Beneficial Owner—voting instructionsBENEFICIAL OWNER-VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, the broker, bank or nominee is considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholderofshareholder nominee, or the shareholder of record, and you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name. If you are a beneficial owner but not the shareholder of record, your broker, bank or nominee will vote your shares as directed by you. If you wish to vote your shares in person at the annual meeting, you must obtain a proxy from your broker, bank or nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting. If you wish to vote your shares online during the annual meeting, you should contact your broker, bank or nominee and see below under “Virtual Meeting Information”.

If your shares are held in street name by a broker, bank or other nominee, you may direct your vote by submitting your voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. Please referPleaserefer to the voting instructions provided by your account manager.broker, bank or other nominee. Your broker, bank or nominee must vote your shares as you direct. If your shares are held by your brokershareholder nominee and you do not give your brokershareholder nominee voting instructions, your shares will not be voted with respect to the election of our directors orand the approval, on a non-bindingan advisory (non-binding) basis of the compensation of our named executive officers. Therefore, to be sure your shares are voted on these matters, please instruct your broker, bank or other nominee as to how you wish itsuch shareholder nominee to vote. Your broker does, however, have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, and may do so even when you have not provided instructions on that matter.

Quorum and Voting Requirements

QUORUM AND VOTING REQUIREMENTS

Under our By-Laws, a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on a matter constitutes a quorum for action on that matter at the annual meeting. Under our By-Laws and North Carolina law, shares represented at the meeting by proxy for any purpose will be deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the meeting. In uncontested elections, Directorsdirectors will be elected if the votes cast for the nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against the nominee’s election by the Common Shares entitled to vote in the election, provided that a quorum is present. In acontesteda contested election, directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the Common Shares entitled to vote in the election. An election is contested if the Secretary of the Company determines that the number of nominees, as determined in accordance with the Company’s By-Laws, exceeds the number of directors to be elected, and the Secretary has not rescinded suchrescindedsuch determination by the record date. If directors are to be elected by a plurality of votes cast, shareholders shall not be permitted to vote against a nominee. This year’s election is uncontested.


8   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT

Accordingly, Directorsdirectors will be elected if the votes cast for the nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against theagainstthe nominee’s election. In addition, Proposals #22 and #33 will be approvedbeapproved if the votes cast for the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal. Abstentions, broker non-votes and shares whichthat are present at the meeting for any other purpose but whichthat are not voted on a particular proposalwillproposal will not affect the outcometheoutcome of the vote on the election of directors or Proposals #2 and #3.2or 3. Any other proposal to properly come before the meeting will be approved if the votes cast for the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal unless the North Carolina Business Corporation Act requires a greater number of affirmative votes.

Revocation of Proxies

REVOCATION OF PROXIES

You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted. If you hold your shares in your own name as a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote in any of the following ways:

by signing and submitting a new proxy card;

by submitting new votes through internet or telephone voting;

by delivering to the Secretary of the Company written instructions revoking your proxy; or

by attending the meeting and voting in person.

by signing and submitting a new proxy card;
by submitting new votes through internet or telephone voting;
by delivering to the Secretary of the Company written instructions revoking your proxy; or
by attending the meeting and voting during the meeting.

You cannot revoke your proxy by merely attending the meeting. If you dissent, you will not have any rights of appraisal with respect to the matters to be acted upon at the meeting.

If your shares are held in street name by a broker, bank or other nominee, you may revoke your voting instructions by submitting new voting instructions to the broker, bank or other nominee who holds your shares.

Proxy Solicitation

PROXY SOLICITATION

We are making this solicitation and will pay the entire cost of preparing and distributing the Notice, proxy materials and Annual Report and of soliciting proxies from the holders of our Common Shares. If you choose to access the proxy materials and Annual Report and/or vote over the internet, you are responsible for any internet access charges you may incur. We have retained the services of Georgeson Inc.Okapi Partners LLC to assist us in the solicitation ofsolicitationof proxies forafor a fee of $6,500$8,000 plus out of pocket expenses. Our directors,Ourdirectors, officers and employees may, but without compensation other than their regular compensation, also solicit proxies by telephone, fax, e-mail or personal interview. We will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable expenses incurred by them in sending the Notice, proxy materials and Annual Report to shareholders.beneficial owners.


www.tangeroutlets.com   WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

   9

3



Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION

VIRTUAL MEETING INFORMATION

As part of our efforts to maintain a safe and healthy environment for our directors, members of management and shareholderswho wish to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we believe that offering shareholders the opportunity to attend and participate in the 2020 AnnualMeeting via remote participation this year is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. Allowing shareholders to attend virtually also enables increased shareholder attendance and participation because shareholders can participate from any location around the world. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online and submit your questions by visitingwww.meetingcenter.io/287143514. To participate in the 2020Annual Meeting, you will need to review the information included on your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. The password forthe meeting is SKT2020.You also will be able to vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting by following the instructions above.

We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual meeting, and the information for assistance will be located on www.meetingcenter.io/287143514.

To participate in the 2020 Annual Meeting, you will need toreview the information included on your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxymaterials. The password for the meeting is SKT2020.

If you are a registered shareholder (i.e., you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), you do not need to register to attend the Annual Meeting virtually on the Internet. Please follow the instructions on the Notice or proxy card that you received.

If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, you must register in advance to attend the Annual Meeting virtually on the Internet. To register to attend the Annual Meeting online by webcast you must submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your right to vote your Company shares along with your name and email address to Computershare. Requests for registration must be labeled as“Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 11, 2020.

You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after Computershare receives your registration materials. Requests for registration should be directed to Computershare at the following:

By email

Forward the email from your broker, or attach an image of your legal proxy, to legalproxy@computershare.com

By mail

Computershare
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Legal Proxy
P.O. Box 43001
Providence, RI 02940-3001

As part of the Annual Meeting, we will hold a live Q&A session, during which we intend to answer questions that are pertinent to the Company and the meeting matters, as time permits.

4NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our By-Laws provide that directors be elected at each Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Our Board currently has eight directors. Sadly, Mr. Donald Drapkin, who had served on our Board since March 2011, unexpectedly passed away on February 22, 2016. Subsequently,In connection with the retirement of three independent directors in May 2020, the Board decreasedexpects to decrease the size of the Board from nineten to eightseven members. The Board has nominated eightseven director candidates for election to the Board at the annual meeting. Each of the eightseven nominees for director designated below is presently a director of the Company.

It is expected thateachthat each of these nominees will be able to serve, but if any such nominee is unable to serve, or for good cause will not serve, the proxies reserve discretion to vote for a substitute nominee or nominees designated by the Board of Directors, or the Board may elect to reduce its size. The terms of all of our directors expire at the next annual meetingAnnual Meeting of shareholdersShareholders or untilwhen their successors are elected and qualified. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named in this Proposal.

Director Resignation Policy

DIRECTOR RESIGNATION POLICY

Our By-Laws provide that in uncontested elections, nominees will be elected if votes cast for each nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against eachsuch nominee’s election, provided that a quorum is present. Pursuant to our director resignation policy, the Board will nominate for re-election as directors only candidates who agree to tender their irrevocable resignation at or prior to their nomination. In addition, the Board will fill director vacancies and new directorships only with candidates who agree to tender, promptly following their appointment to the Board, the same form of resignation tendered by other directors in accordance with the director resignation policy. TheirThe resignations will only become effective upon the occurrence of both the failure to receive the required majority vote for election and Board acceptance of theirthe resignations. If a director nominee does not receive therequiredthe required vote, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or another committee consisting solely of independent directors (excluding the director nominee in question) will consider and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the director nominee’s previously tendered resignation. The Board (not including(excluding the director nominee in question) will make a final determination as to whether to accept or reject the director nominee’s resignation within 90 days following the certification of the shareholder vote. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board may consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept a Director’sdirector’s resignation. The Company will then promptly disclose the Board’s decision in a document furnished or filed with the SEC.

Board Diversity and Nominee Qualifications

BOARD DIVERSITY AND REFRESHMENT

The Board seeks a mix of backgrounds and experience among its members. We do not follow any ratio or formulabelieve that decision making is improved when various perspectives contribute to determine the appropriate mix. Rather,discussion. In evaluating director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses its judgment to identify nominees whose viewpoints, backgrounds, experience, gender, race, ethnicity and other demographics,attributes, taken as a whole, contribute to the high standards of Board service at the Company. While the Board does not follow any ratio or formula to determine the appropriate mix, the Board is committed to increasing gender and racial diversity among directors over time and, as reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is committed to including highly qualified women and minority candidates in each search the Board undertakes. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses its performance as to all aspects of the selection and nomination process for directors, including diversity, as part of its annual self-evaluation process.

The Board’s commitment to diversity is reflective of the Company’s policy of inclusiveness throughout the organization. Our management team reflects gender and racial diversity as well as diversity of viewpoints, background and experience. For example, more than fifty percent of the members of our executive leadership team are women.

Luis A. Ubiñas was appointed to our Board of Directors, effective July 29, 2019. Mr. Ubiñas’ appointment, along with the recent addition of Susan E. Skerritt, reflects the board’s focused effort to refresh the composition of the Board and foster its diverse composition. Furthermore, the Company’s three longest serving independent directors, Allan L. Schuman, William G. Benton, and Thomas E. Robinson, will retire from the Board at the end of their current term at the annual meeting and have therefore not been nominated for re-election. In May of 2019, as part of the Board’s chair rotation practice, David B. Henry was appointed to the role of Non-Executive Chair of the Board, replacing Thomas J. Reddin. Our focus on Board composition reflects our thoughtful approach and commitment to ongoing Board refreshment and diversification. These changes have further increased the diversity of our Board in terms of gender, ethnicity and career experience.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM5


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

NOMINEE QUALIFICATIONS

The biographical description below for each nominee includes the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led to the conclusion by the Board of DirectorsthatDirectors that such person should serve as a director of the Company. Each of our director nominees has achieved an extremely high level of success in his or her career. In these positions, each has been directly involved in the challenges relating to setting the strategic direction of or managing and overseeing the financial performance, personnel and processes of complex, public and private companies. Each has had exposure to effective leaders, and as a result, we believe has developed the ability to judge leadership qualities. Each of themalso has experience in serving as an executive officer or on the board of directors of at least one other major corporation, both of which we believe provides additional relevant experience on which each nominee can draw.

10   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Information Regarding NomineesINFORMATION REGARDING NOMINEES

Jeffrey B. Citrin

Independent Director

Age William G. Benton62

Director since
July 28, 2014

Senior Advisor and Vice Chairman of Square Mile Capital Management LLC

Committees:
Audit (Chair),
Compensation & Human Capital

BACKGROUND

   Age 70
   Director since
   June 4,1993

   Non-Executive
   Chairman of 
   the Board

   Committees:
   Audit, Compensation,
   Nominating &
   Corporate   
   Governance (Chair)

Non-Executive Chairman of the Board since January 1, 2013 and Director of the Company since June 4, 1993. Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Salem Senior Housing, Inc., a senior living facility operator, since May 2002. Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Diversified Senior Services Inc. from May 1996 to May 2002. Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Benton Investment Company since 1982. Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Health Equity Properties, Inc. from 1987 to September 1994.

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE TANGER BOARD

Mr. Benton has over 22 years of experience on our Board and has an extensive knowledge of our Company. As Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of multiple public real estate companies, Mr. Benton has gained first-hand experience in managing large real estate organizations with ultimate management responsibility for the corporation’s financial performance and deployment of its capital.


OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS

None

   Jeffrey B. Citrin

BACKGROUND

   Age 58
   Director since
   July 28, 2014

   Managing Principal of
   Square Mile Capital
   Management LLC

   Committees:
   Audit

Director of the Company since July 28, 2014. Mr. Citrin is a Managing Principalserves as Senior Advisor and Vice Chairman of Square Mile Capital Management LLC, a private New York-based investment firm focusing on real estate related opportunities, sincewhich Mr. Citrin founded in 2006. From 1994 to 2005 he was President and co-founder of Blackacre Capital Management LLC, now known as Cerberus Institutional Real Estate. Mr. Citrin served as Managing Director of the Commercial Mortgage Investment Unit of Oppenheimer & Company, Inc. from 1993 to 1994. From 1991 to 1993, he was Vice President of the Distressed Real Estate Principal Group of Credit Suisse First Boston, Inc. and, from 1986 to 1991, Mr. Citrin served as Vice President of the Real Estate Investment Banking Unit of Chemical Bank. He was an attorney in the real estate practices of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP and Proskauer Rose LLP from 1983 to 1986. Mr. Citrin served as an Independent Trustee of First Union Real Estate and Mortgage, now known as Winthrop Realty Trust, from 2001 to 2003 and currently serves on the advisory boardBoard of Directors of Trinity Place Holdings Inc. (NYSE: TPHS), the Board of Advisors of the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York and as Co-Chairman of the Hood Museum Board of Overseers.

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE TANGER BOARD

Mr. Citrin has over 2630 years of experience in public company and private company real estate investment during which he has structured complex real estate and financial transactions. The Board benefits from this technical experience as well as from hisMr. Citrin’s extensive executive, management and legal experience.


OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
Trinity Place Holdings Inc.

None


www.tangeroutlets.com   6

   11

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

David B. Henry

Non-Executive Chair of the Board

Independent Director

Age 71

Director since
January 1, 2016

Retired Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Kimco Realty Corporation

Committees:
Audit, Compensation & Human Capital, Nominating & Corporate Governance

BACKGROUND

   Age 67
   Director since 
   January 1, 2016

   Retired Vice
   ChairmanNon-Executive Chair of the
Board of Directors
since May 17, 2019 and Chief Executive
   Officer of Kimco
   Realty Corporation

   Committees:
   None

Directordirector of the Company since January 1, 2016. Mr. Henry was formerly the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Kimco Realty Corporation (“Kimco”)., a publicly-traded REIT. He served as Kimco’s Chief Executive Officer from December 2009 to January 2016 and as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors from April 2001 to January 2016, President from December 2008 to August 2014, and Chief Investment Officer from April 2001 to December 2009.2016. Prior to joining Kimco, he spent 23 years at G.E. Capital Real Estate, General Electric’s former real estate division, where he served as the Senior Vice President /Chief& Chief Investment Officer and was Chairman of G.E. Capitalthe Investment Advisors from 1997 to 2001. Formerly its Chairman,Committee and member of the Credit Committee. Mr. Henry is currently a past Trustee and served as 2011-2012 Chairman of the International Council of Shopping Centers, and also served on the Executive Committeewas a former Vice-Chairman of the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts.Trusts and a former member of the Executive Board of the Real Estate Roundtable. His other public REIT board experience includes service on the boards of HCP,Healthpeak Properties, Inc. since January 2004, where he serves as Chairman of the Finance Committee, VEREIT, Inc. since September 2015, and Columbia Property Trust, Inc. since January 2016, as well as Chairman of the Compensation Committee of HCP, Inc.2016. Mr. Henry is also a director of Fairfield County Bank, a private Connecticut mutual savings bank, director of Starwood Real Estate Income Trust, a non-traded REIT, and the co-founder of Peaceable Street Capital, a preferred equity lender for income producing commercial real estate properties, andproperties. In addition, he serves on the real estate advisory boards of New York University, Baruch College, ALTO Real Estate Funds and Baruch College.
Shift Capital.

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE TANGER BOARD

Mr. Henry has over 3539 years of real estate industry experience with multinational, publicly traded companies. The Board benefits from his familiarity with the REIT industry, particularly the retail sector, as well as from his extensive executive, financial and management expertise.


OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS

Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
HCP,Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
VEREIT


Thomas J. Reddin

BACKGROUND

Independent Director

Age Age 5559


Director since
July 26, 2010


   Managing Partner 
   and Owner of 
   Red Dog Ventures

   Committees:
   Audit (Chair), 
   Compensation, 
   Nominating & 
   Corporate 
   Governance

Director of the Company since July 26, 2010. Mr. Reddin is currently the Managing Partner and Owner of Red Dog Ventures, LLC

Committees:
Audit, Compensation & Human Capital (Chair)

BACKGROUND
Director of the Company since July 26, 2010 and served as Non-Executive Chair of the Board from May 20, 2016 to May 17, 2019. Mr. Reddin has served as Managing Partner and Owner of Red Dog Ventures, LLC, a venture capital and advisory firm, a position he has held since 2009. He wasHis prior experience includes serving as Chief Executive Officer of Richard Petty Motorsports from 2008 to 2009 and as Chief Executive Officer (fromfrom 2005 to 2007)2007 and President and Chief Operating Officer (fromfrom 2000 to 2005)2005 of Lending Tree.com.LendingTree. com. Mr. Reddin also held various senior leadership positions at Coca-Cola Company from 1995 to 1999, including Vice President, Consumer Marketing of Coca-Cola USA, and at Kraft Foods, Inc. from 1982 to 1995. Mr. Reddin has served on the Board of Directors of Premier Farnell plc since September 2010, Deluxe Corporation since February 2014 and Asbury Automotive Group since June 2014, and previously served on the Board of Directors of Premier Farnell plc from September 2010 to October 2016 and of Valassis Communications Inc. from July 2010 to February 2014 and R.H. Donnelley from July 2007 to January 2010.
2014.

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE TANGER BOARD

Mr. Reddin has over 3033 years of experience in consumer marketing and e-commerce, including executive and management experience. His experience in growing and building businesses and developing and marketing brand name consumer products enables him to provide invaluable insights into helping the Company elevate its brand.


OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS

Asbury Automotive Group
Deluxe Corporation
Premier Farnell plc (London Stock Exchange)

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM7


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

12   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy StatementBridget M. Ryan-Berman




Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Independent Director

Age Thomas E. Robinson59

Director since
January 1, 2009

Managing Partner of Ryan Berman Advisory, LLC

Committees:
Compensation & Human Capital, Nominating & Corporate Governance (Chair)

BACKGROUND

   Age 68
   Director since 
   January 21, 1994

   Senior Advisor of 
   Stifel, Nicolaus & 
   Company

   Committees:
   Audit, Compensation, 
   Nominating & 
   Corporate 
   Governance

Director of the Company since January 21, 1994. Mr. Robinson has served as Senior Advisor of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company (formerly Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc.), a financial services firm, since March 2009. He was Managing Director of Stifel, Nicolaus and Company from June 1997 to March 2009 and Director (May 1994 to June 1997), President (August 1994 to June 1997) and Chief Financial Officer (July 1996 to June 1997) of Storage USA, Inc. Mr. Robinson has also been a director/trustee of First Potomoc Realty Trust since July 2013, and a Director of Essex Property Trust, Inc. since April 2014 following its merger with BRE Properties. He served as a Director of BRE from July 2007 until closing the transaction with Essex in April 2014. He was a trustee of CenterPoint Properties Trust from December 1993 until the trust was acquired in March 2006 and is a former member of the board of governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (or “NAREIT”). In November 2009, NAREIT selected him to receive its Industry Achievement Award for his wisdom, expertise and service to the REIT industry.

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE TANGER BOARD

Mr. Robinson has over 22 years of experience on our Board and extensive knowledge of our Company. As an investment banker and investment advisor, Mr. Robinson possesses significant expertise in the operation of capital markets and the evaluation of investment opportunities. His service on the audit committees of two other public real estate companies and as a President and Chief Financial Officer of a public real estate company give him extensive audit knowledge and experience in audit- and financial control-related matters.


OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS

Essex Property Trust
First Potomoc Realty Trust

   Bridget M. 
   Ryan-Berman

BACKGROUND

   Age 55
   Director since 
   January 1, 2009

   Independent 
   Consultant

   Committees:
   Compensation, 
   Nominating & 
   Corporate 
   Governance

Director of the Company since January 1, 2009. Ms. Ryan-Berman ishas served as a Managing Partner at Ryan Berman Advisory, LLC, a strategic advisory and consulting firm, since January 2018. From June 2016 to December 2017, she served as Chief Experience Officer of Enjoy Technology, Inc., a provider of setup and training services for tech products. From 2015 to 2016, she was an independent consultant advising multi-channel brands and companies on business innovation and large-scale transformation designed around the consumercustomer experience. From 2011 to 2015, Ms. Ryan-Berman served as Chief Executive Officer of Victoria’s Secret Direct, LLC, an online and catalogue division of Victoria’s Secret, a specialty retailer of women’s lingerie, beauty products, apparel and accessories. She was formerly an independent consultant advising clients in the retail, wholesale and financial investment sectors providing strategic planning, business development and executive coaching services. Ms. Ryan-Berman wasserved as Chief Executive Officer of Giorgio Armani Corp., the wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of Giorgio Armani S.p.A., a provider of fashion and luxury goods products, from 2006 to 2007 and wasas Vice President/Chief Operating Officer of Apple Computer Retail from 2004 to 2005. Ms. Ryan-Berman also held various executive positions with Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, including Group President of Polo Ralph Lauren Global Retail, from 1992 to 2004 and served in various capacities at May Department Stores, Federated Department Stores, and Allied Stores Corp. from 1982 to 1992. In addition, Ms. Ryan-Berman has served on the board of directors of Asbury Automotive Group since April 2018 and on the board of directors of Newell Brands Inc. since May 2018. Ms. Berman was a member of the board of directors, and served on the audit committee for J. Crew Group, Inc. from 2005 to 2006.
She also serves on the board of Tegra Global and serves as Chair of the Board of Directors of BH Cosmetics.

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE TANGER BOARD

Ms. Ryan-Berman has over 3237 years of experience in the retail business and, as a senior level executive, has helped oversee the strategies and operations of some of the leading fashion and luxury goods groups in the world. She serves as a strategic advisor and board director for multi-channel consumer companies focused on the acceleration of brand growth and business development, digital transformation and consumer engagement. Ms. Ryan-Berman’s extensive experience in apparel and retailing enables her to provide invaluable insight into the environment in which the Company operates.


OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
Asbury Automotive Group
Newell Brands Inc.

None


www.tangeroutlets.com   Susan E. Skerritt

   13




Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Independent Director

Age Allan L. Schuman65

Director since
July 30, 2018

Senior Advisor, Promontory Financial Group

Committees:
Audit, Nominating & Corporate Governance

BACKGROUND

   Age 81
   Director since 
   August 23, 2004

   Chairman of the
   Board of The Schwan 
   Food Company

   Committees:
   Compensation (Chair)

Director of the Company since August 23, 2004. Mr. SchumanJuly 30, 2018. Ms. Skerritt has been the Chairmana Senior Advisor to Promontory Financial Group, a financial services company and wholly owned subsidiary of the Board of Directors of The Schwan Food Company, a provider of fine frozen foods,IBM, guiding clients on regulatory, governance, and risk management matters, since January 2009. He2018. She was previously Chairman of the Board from January 2000 to May 2006, President andformerly Chairwoman, Chief Executive Officer from March 1995 to July 2004, and President of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“Deutsche Bank”), Deutsche Bank’s U.S. commercial banking entity, from 2016 to 2018. Previously at Deutsche Bank, beginning in 2013, she led the transaction banking businesses in North and Chief Operating Officer from August 1992South America, and also led the global correspondent banking business. Prior to March 1995Deutsche Bank, Ms. Skerritt spent seven years at Bank of Ecolab, Inc, a global provider of premium cleaning, sanitation and maintenance products and services. He was named Chairman Emeritus of Ecolab in 2006. Mr. Schuman is the Chairman of the Board of Florida Atlantic University College of Business and is aNew York Mellon. She served as an Executive member of the board of directors of Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, NA and as an Executive Vice President, co-leading the National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation.
acquisition and integration of the JPMorgan Corporate Trust business. Earlier in her career she held various leadership roles at companies including Morgan Stanley, Treasury Strategies, Ernst & Young and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company. Since February 2018, Ms. Skerritt has been a Director of Royal Bank of Canada USA, serving as the Chair of the Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit and Risk Committees. She has also served on the Board of Trustees of Hamilton College since 1994, has been a Director of The Brooklyn Hospital Center since 2013 and has been a Director of the Falcon Group since February 2020.

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE TANGER BOARD

As ChairmanWith a 36-year financial career as a demonstrated leader with deep expertise in global financial markets, regulatory compliance, and Chief Executive Officer of Ecolab, Mr. Schuman has first-hand experience in managing a large, multinational corporation focused on worldwide consumer markets, with ultimaterisk management, responsibility for the corporation’s financial performance and the deployment of its capital.Ms. Skerritt brings valuable perspective to Tanger’s Board.


OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
None


8NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

None

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Steven B. Tanger

Age71

Director since
May 13, 1993

Chief Executive Officer

Committees:
None

BACKGROUND

   Age 67
   Director since 
   May 13, 1993

   President and Chief 
   Executive Officer

   Committees:
   None

Director of the Company since May 13, 1993. Mr. Tanger has beenserved as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since May 2017; President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company sincefrom January 1, 2009. Prior2009 to that, he wasMay 2017; President and Chief Operating Officer from January 1995 to December 20082008; and Executive Vice President from 1986 to December 1994. Mr. Tanger has served on the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of The Fresh Market, Inc. sincefrom June 2012.
2012 to April 2016.

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE TANGER BOARD

Mr. Tanger joined the Company’s predecessor in 1986 and is the son of the Company’s founder,Stanley K. Tanger. Together with his father, Mr. Tanger has helped develop the Company, into a portfoliowhichas of 42March 1, 2020, consisted of 39 upscale outlet shopping centers in 2120 states coast to coast and in Canada, totaling approximately 14.3 million square feet leased to over 3,0002,800 stores operated by more than 480515 different brand name companies. Mr. Tanger provides an insider’s perspective in Board discussionsBoarddiscussions about the business and strategic direction of the Company and has experience in all aspects of the Company’s business.


OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
None


Luis A. Ubiñas

Age57

Director since
July 29, 2019

Former President,
Ford Foundation

Committees:
Audit, Nominating & Corporate Governance

The Fresh Market,BACKGROUND
Director of the Company since July 29, 2019. Since 2014, Mr. Ubiñas has served on the Board of Trustees of the Pan American Development Foundation, which invests nearly $100 million annually in sustainable development projects in Latin America and the Caribbean. From 2008 to 2013, he wasPresident of the Ford Foundation, then the second-largest foundation in the United States, where he led a broad-based restructuring of the organization, including a strategic resetting of its programs,reinvestment of over 80% of the endowment, and a rebuilding of facilities and systems. Previously,Mr. Ubiñas spent eighteen years at McKinsey & Company where, as a Senior Partner, he led the firm’s media practice during the transition from analog to digital and omnichannel platforms. SinceSeptember 2010, Mr. Ubiñas has been a Director of Electronic ArtsInc. and currently serves as its Lead Independent Director and Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. In addition, hehas served on the board of Boston Private Financial Holdings since September 2017. Mr. Ubiñas is aboard member and chair of the finance committee of the New York Public Library, Vice Chair of the Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation and a member of the Advisory Board of the United Nations Fund of International Partnerships.

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE TANGER BOARD
As a demonstrated leader with deep expertise in helping companies adopt successful strategies during periods of transformation, Mr. Ubiñas brings valuable perspective to Tanger’s Board.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
Electronic Arts Inc.

Vote Required.The nominees will be elected if votes cast for each nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against eachsuch nominee’s election, provided that a quorum is present. Accordingly, abstentions, broker non-votes and Common Shares present at the meeting for any other purpose but which are not voted on this proposal will not affect the outcome of the vote on the nominees. David B. Henry was appointed to the Board on January 1, 2016 and was approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for inclusion on the proxy card to stand for election by the shareholders. The remaining seven nominees who were approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for inclusion on the proxy card are standing for re-election.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR ALL OF THE NOMINEES SET FORTH ABOVE.

Director IndependenceWWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM9


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the listing standards of the NYSE require that a majority of our directors be “independent” and that every member of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation and Human Capital Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee be “independent,” in each case as such term is defined by the NYSE listing requirements. Generally, independent directors are those directors who are not concurrently serving as officers of the Company and who have no material relationship with us. We presently have eightten directors, including sevennine independent directors. Our Board has affirmatively determined that the following seven nominees to our Boardnine current directors are “independent”,“independent,” as that term is defined under the listing standards of the NYSE:

William G. Benton, Jeffrey B. Citrin, David B. Henry, Thomas J. Reddin, Thomas E. Robinson, Bridget M. Ryan-Berman, and Allan L. Schuman. In addition, the Board had determined that Donald G. Drapkin was independent.Schuman, Susan E. Skerritt and Luis A. Ubiñas. Steven B. Tanger is concurrently serving as our President and CEO and, therefore, is not independent.

14   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




TableIn determining the independence of Contentsour directors, the Board considered that Ms. Ryan-Berman is a director of Newell Brands Inc., the owner of a portfolio of brands, including one of our tenants. Our Board considered the nature of this relationship and the dollar value of the annual rental payments received from the tenant and determined that the relationship does not impairMs. Ryan-Berman’s independence.

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORSBOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE AND RISK OVERSIGHT

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

Pursuant to our By-Laws and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board determines the appropriate board leadership structure for our Company from time to time. As part of our annual Board self-evaluation process, we evaluate our leadership structure to ensure that the Board continues to believe that it provides the optimal structure for our Company and shareholders. We recognize that different board leadership structures may be appropriate for companies in different situations.

We operate under a board leadership structure with separate roles for our CEO and our Non-Executive ChairmanChair of the Board.Board, who has been determined independent. Our current leadership structure permits the CEO to focus his attention on managing our Company and permits the Non-Executive ChairmanChair to manage the Board. Accordingly, we believe our current leadership structure, with Mr. Steven B. Tanger serving as CEO and Mr. William G. BentonandMr. David B. Henry serving as Non-Executive ChairmanChair of the Board,is the optimal structure for us at this time.

The Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management processes, and our Audit Committee, or other committees as discussed in the Corporate Responsibility sectionbelow, assists the Board in fulfilling this responsibility. The AuditCommitteeAudit Committee receives reports from management at least quarterly regarding the Company’s assessment of risks. These risks relate to a range of issues including strategy, operations and cybersecurity, among others. The Audit Committee, which also considers our risk profile, reports regularly to the full Board on these matters. The Audit Committee and the full Board focus on the most significant risks facing the Company and the Company’s general risk management strategy, and also ensure that risks undertaken by us are consistent with the Board’s levels of risk tolerance. While the Board oversees our overall risk management, our management is responsible for day-to-dayday-today risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing the Company. The Board does not believe that its role in the oversight of the Company’s risks affects the Board’s leadership structure.

The Company has reviewed its compensation policies and practices and has determined that it has no policies or practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Attendance at Board and Committee Meetings

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

ESG principles provide our stakeholders with an additional perspective on the Company’s performance.

Transparent disclosure practices, governance and ethics policies, strong employee engagement and deep community commitment are all important factors for our enterprise. The Board’s oversight of our ESG initiatives reflects our goal ofdelivering long-term value to all of our stakeholders including retail partners, shareholders, customers, community partnersand employee team members. During 2019, the Boardamended the charters of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation and Human Capital Committee to allocate to each committee the primary responsibility for the oversight of certain ESG matters.

ATTENDANCE AT BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS

The Board held six regularsixregular meetings during 2015.2019. Each of the incumbent directors in office during 20152019 attended at least 75% 90%of the Board meetings and meetings of committees on which the director served, during the period in which such person served as a director. We do not have a formal policy of attendance for directorsfordirectors at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. SevenEight of our eightournine directors who were serving at the time of the 2019 AnnualMeeting of Shareholders attended the 2015 Annual Meetingmeeting.

10NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Shareholders.Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, non-management directors are required to meet in executive sessions following each regularly scheduled quarterly Board meeting. The Non-Executive ChairmanChair of the Board presides at all executive sessions at which he is in attendance. In addition,to the extent applicable, non-management directors who are not independent under the rules of the NYSE may participate in these executive sessions, but our independent directors meet in executive session at least once per year.

Committees of the Board

ANTI-HEDGING POLICY

The Company has established an anti-hedging policy applicable to our executive officers, directors and employees. The policy prohibits any director or executive officer of the Company from trading in puts, calls, options or other derivative securities based on the Company’s securities. In addition, certain forms of hedging or monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts, allow a shareholder to lock in much of the value of his or her holdings, often in exchange for all orpart of the potential upside appreciation in the shareholdings. These transactions allow the shareholder to continue to own the covered securities, but without the full risks and rewards of ownership. When that occurs, the owner may no longer have the same objectives as the company’s other shareholders. Therefore, executive officers, directors and employees may not engage in any such transactions with respect to the Common Shares they own.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

The Board has three standing committees to facilitate and assist the Board in the execution of its responsibilities. The current committees are the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In accordance with NYSE listing standards, all of the committees arecomprised solelyare comprisedsolely of independent directors. Charters for each of the Audit, Compensation and Human Capital, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are available on the Company’s website at www.tangeroutlets.com by first clicking on “INVESTOR RELATIONS”,RELATIONS,” then “CORPORATE OVERVIEW””GOVERNANCE” and then “GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS”.

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   15




Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORSDOCUMENTS.”

The table below shows the current membership for each of the standing committees.

AgeYears
on Board
IndependentAudit
Committee
Compensation
and Human
Capital
Committee
Nominating
and Corporate
Governance
Committee
William G. Benton**7426
Jeffrey B. Citrin625
David B. Henry*714
Thomas J. Reddin599
Thomas E. Robinson**7226
Bridget M. Ryan-Berman5911
Allan L. Schuman**8515
Susan E. Skerritt651
Steven B. Tanger7126
Luis A. Ubiñas57<1

MemberChair*Non-Executive Chair**Not nominated for reelection

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COMAudit CommitteeCompensation
Committee
Nominating and
Corporate Governance
Committee11

William G. Benton(1)

Jeffrey B. Citrin

Thomas J. Reddin

Thomas E. Robinson

Bridget M. Ryan-Berman

Allan L. Schuman



(1) Mr. Benton was named Interim Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair in March 2016, following the deathTable of Mr. Drapkin, who was serving in that capacity.Contents

Member

Chair

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Audit Committee.AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Board has established an Audit Committee currently consisting of fourseven of our independent directors, each of whom satisfies the additional independence requirements of Rule 10A-3Rule10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (referredamended(referred to as the “Exchange Act”). The purpose, each of the Audit Committee is (i) to assistwhich have been determined by the Board in fulfilling its oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accountants and the performance of our independent registered public accountants and our internal audit function and (ii) to prepare any audit committee reports required by the SEC to be included in our annual Proxy Statement. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accountants and approves in advance, or adopts appropriate procedures to approve in advance, all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accountants. The Audit Committee is also charged with discussing with management the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, the Company’s significant financial risk exposures and the actions management has taken to limit, monitor or control such exposures. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is “financially literate”, as that term is defined in the listing requirements of the NYSE and that each membersix of the committee, all of whom are named above, iswhich qualify as an “audit committee financial expert”,expert,” as that term is defined in IteminItem 407(d) of Regulation S-K.

PURPOSE AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight of:
the integrity of our financial statements;
our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
the qualifications and independence of our independentregistered public accountants;
the performance of our independent registered public accountants and our internal audit function, and
our enterprise risk management;
Prepares any audit committee report required by the SEC to be included in our annual Proxy Statement;
Appoints, retains, oversees and provides compensation for the work of our independent registered public accountants and approves in advance, or adopts appropriate procedures to approve in advance, all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accountants; and
Discusses with management the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, theCompany’s significant financial risk exposures and theactions management has taken to limit, monitor or control such exposures.

During 2015,2019, there were fourfive meetings of the Audit Committee.

Compensation Committee.COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE

The Board has established a Compensation and Human Capital Committee, formerly called the Compensation Committee, currently consisting of five of our independent directors, each of whom meets the NYSE’s heightened standardadditional standards for compensation committee membership. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include reviewingmembership and approving the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensationeach qualifies as a non-employeedirector for purposes of Section 16 of the CEO, evaluating the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives and, either as a committee or together with other independent directors (as directedby the Board), determining compensation for our CEO. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for making recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of other executive officers and directors. The Compensation Committee also administers our amended and restated Incentive Award Plan (the “Incentive Award Plan”), except in the case of awards to non-employee directors for which the plan is administered by the Board. This plan provides for the issuance of equity-based awards to the Company’s employees, directors, and consultants (other than non-employee directors). The Compensation Committee selects the employees and consultants (other than non-employee directors) to whom equity-based awards under the Incentive Award Plan will be granted and establishes the terms and conditions of the awards. Exchange Act.

PURPOSE AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Reviews and approves the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO;
Evaluates the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives and, either as a committee or together with other independent directors (as directed by the Board), determines compensation for our CEO;
Makes recommendations to the Board with respect to thecompensation of other executive officers and directors;
Administers our Incentive Award Plan, except in the case of awards to non-employee directors for which the plan is administered by the Board. This plan provides for the issuance of equity-based awards to the Company’s employees, directors, and consultants (other than non-employee directors);
Selects the employees and consultants (other than non-employee directors) to whom equity-based awards under the Incentive Award Plan will be granted and establishes the terms and conditions of the awards; and
Reviews programs and strategies related to human capital management, including retention, management succession, diversity, culture and engagement.

During 2015,2019, there were three meetings of the CompensationCompensationand Human Capital Committee.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The Board has established a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consisting of fourseven of our independent directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes

PURPOSE AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Makes recommendations to the Board regarding changes in the size of the Board or any committee of the Board;
Recommends individuals for the Board to nominate for election as directors;
Recommends individuals for appointment to committees of the Board;
Establishes procedures for the Committee’s oversight of the evaluation of the Board and management;
Recommends approaches to director orientation and continuing education and develops and recommends to the Board corporate governance guidelines;
Evaluates annually the effectiveness of the Board as awhole and identifies any areas in which the Board may bebetter served by adding new members with different skills, backgrounds or areas of experience;
Assists the Board in maintaining a skills matrix as a tool for considering the experience of directors; and
Reviews the Company’s programs with respect to the environment and sustainability.

During 2019, there were four meetings of the Board or any committee of the Board, recommends individuals for the Board to nominate for election as directors, recommends individuals for appointment to committees of the Board, establishes procedures for the Board’s oversight of the evaluation of the Board and management, and develops and recommends corporate governance guidelines.Nominating andCorporate Governance Committee.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates annually the effectiveness of the Board as a whole and identifies any areas in which the Board would be better served by adding new members with different skills, backgrounds or areas of experience. In identifying qualified director candidates for election to the Board and to fill vacancies on the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee solicits current directors for the names of potentially qualified candidates, may ask directors to pursue their own business contacts for the names of potentially qualified candidates and may recommend that the Board engage a third party search

16   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

firm to identify names ofnamesof potentially qualified candidates. In 2015,2019, the Nominating andNominatingand Corporate Governance Committee considered a potential director candidate recommended by our CEO.a non-managementdirector, who would increase the diversity, skills and experienceof the Board as a whole. Members of the Committee met with the candidate, David Henry,Luis Ubiñas, and noted his expertise as a strategic thinker and change agent with deep experience in the marketing and media arenas. Mr. Henry’s knowledgeUbiñas’ board experience, coupled with his proven track record of success, complement the retail REIT industry and his significant experience as an executiveexisting strengths of a public retail real estate company.our Board. Following further consideration and evaluation, and upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, he was appointed to thetothe Board effective January 1, 2016July 29, 2019 and recommended by the NominatingtheNominating and Corporate Governance Committee for election atelectionat the 20162020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

12NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board values directors who will bring a sufficient range of different perspectives to bear, generate appropriate discussion and debate, and fulfill their oversight responsibilities to foster significant value creation for our shareholders. The Board considers director candidates based on a number of factors including: whether the Board member will be “independent” in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and as such term is defined by the NYSE listing requirements; personal integrity and other qualities and characteristics, accomplishments and reputation in the business community; experience with businesses and other organizations of comparable size and current knowledge and contacts in the Company’s industry or other industries relevant to the Company’s business; experience and understanding of the Company’s business and financial matters affecting its business;itsbusiness; ability and willingness to commit adequate time to Board and committee matters; the fit of the individual’s skills and personality with those of other directors and potential directors in building a Board that is effective collegial and responsive to the needs of the Company; and diversity of viewpoints, background, experience, gender, race, ethnicity and other demographics.attributes. It is the policy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to consider nominees for the Board recommended by the Company’s shareholders in accordance with the procedures described under “Other Matters—ShareholderMatters-Shareholder Proposals and NominationsandNominations for the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders—ShareholderShareholders-Shareholder Suggestions for Director Nominations” in this Proxy Statement. Shareholder nominees who are recommended in accordance with these procedures will be given the same consideration as nominees for director from other sources. During 2015, there were two meetings of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Communications with Directors

COMMUNICATIONS WITH DIRECTORS

Any shareholder or interested party is welcome to communicate with our Non-Executive ChairmanChair of the Board, any other director, the non-management directors as a group or the Board of Directors as a whole by writing to the directorsrelevant director(s) as follows:Tanger Factory Outlet Centers,Inc., Attention Non-Executive Chairman,Chair, c/o the Corporate Secretary, 3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, NC 27408. All communications, except for marketing and advertising materials, are forwarded directly to our directors.

Compensation of Directors

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

The annual compensation to the non-employee directors for 20152019 was set and approved by the Board based on the recommendations of,recommendationsof, and a peer group analysis performed by, independent compensation consultants engaged by the Compensation Committee. During 2015,and Human CapitalCommittee. Compensation paid to our non-employee directors were each paid annual cash compensation of $50,000. In addition, the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board was paid an additional annual fee of $50,000, the chairs of the Audit and Compensation Committees were each paid an annual fee of $25,000, and the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was paid an annual fee of $15,000. If a new directorfor services in 2019 is appointed to the Board, or if a presiding director is appointed chairman of a committee, during the calendar year, the retainer fees and chair fees are prorated based on the effective date of his or her appointment. The Board concluded that the annual cash compensation and committee chair fees payable to the non-employee directors for 2016 will remain the same as 2015.described below.

Additional Cash Compensation     
Non-Executive Chair$   50,000
Committee Chair Fees
Audit Committee$25,000
Compensation and Human Capital Committee$25,000
Nominating and Corporate Governance$15,000

Our CEO, who is also a director, willis not be paid any director fees for his services as a director of the Company. Our non-employee directors are reimbursed for their expenses incurred in attending Board meetings.

EQUITY COMPENSATION

We may from time to time under the Incentive Award Plan grant to any non-employee director options, restricted or deferred shares or other awards upon approval of the entire Board. The Board selects the non-employee directors to whom equity-based awards under the Incentive Award Plan will be granted and establishes the terms andconditionsand conditions of the awards based on recommendations and advice from the Compensation and Human Capital Committee. However, as set forth in the Incentive Award Plan, a non-employee director may not receive awards under the Incentive Award Plan with an aggregate value in excessinexcess of $500,000 during any fiscal year. The Board approved an awardapprovedawards of 4,500 restricted Common Shares to each non-employee director with a grant date fairvalue of approximately $165,000 for each of 20162020, 2019 and 2015, and 5,000 restricted Common Shares to each non-employee director for 2014. Mr. Henry received no awards during 2015 and 2014 and Mr. Citrin received no awards during 2014 because each joined the board after grants to directors were made during those respective years.2018.

The Company’s Board of Directors expects all non-employee directors to own a meaningful equity interest in the Company to more closely align the interests of directors with those of shareholders. Our equity ownership guidelines require non-employee directors to hold 5,000 Common Shares within 3 years of their election to the Board. In addition, the Director Deferred Share Program of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the “Director Deferred Share Program”) allows non-employee directors to elect to receive all or a portion of their cash and/or equity compensation in deferred shares. In the event a non-employee director elects to defer compensation, such compensation (along with any dividends with respect to such compensation) will be credited to a bookkeeping account and paid in Common SharesCommonShares within 60 days following the payment date elected by suchbysuch director. Such payment date will be one of the

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   17




Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

following dates: followingdates: (1) the date of termination of directorship, (2) a specified annualspecifiedannual anniversary of the date of termination of directorship, (3) a specifiedaspecified date that is after December 31 of the applicable service year, or (4) the earlier of the date of death or disability. Any deferred sharesdeferredshares shall be subjecttosubject to the same vesting conditions applicable to restricted Common Shares that would have been granted absentgrantedabsent a deferral election. In 2015,2019, two non-employee directors participateddirectorsparticipated in the Director Deferred Share Program.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM13


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

MINIMUM EQUITY OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

The Company’s Board of Directors expects all non-employee directors to own a meaningful equity interest in the Company to more closely align the interests of directors with those of shareholders. Our equity ownership guidelines require non-employee directors to hold Common Shares with a value equal to five times the base annual board retainer within five years of joining the Board. All non-employee directors who have been board members for at least 3 years met the share ownershipguidelines as of December 31, 2019.

Director Compensation Table

The following table shows the total compensation for our non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015:2019:

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

NameYearFees
Earned
or Paid
In cash
Share
Awards
(1)
All Other
Compensation(2)
Total     Year     Fees Earned or
Paid In cash
     Share
Awards (1)
     All Other
Compensation (2)
     Total
William G. Benton 2015$100,000$173,475           $9,321           $282,7962019      $60,000$164,996          $17,437$242,433
Jeffrey B. Citrin(3)201550,000173,4753,848227,323201985,000164,99617,437267,433
Donald G. Drapkin(4)201565,000173,4759,321247,796
David B. Henry(5)2015
David B. Henry2019100,625164,99617,437283,058
Thomas J. Reddin201575,000173,4759,321257,796201994,375164,99617,437276,808
Thomas E. Robinson201550,000173,4759,321232,796201960,000164,99617,437242,433
Bridget M. Ryan-Berman201550,000173,4759,321232,796201975,000164,99617,437257,433
Allan L. Schuman2015 75,000   173,475  9,321257,796201960,000164,99617,437242,433
Susan E. Skerritt (4)201960,000164,9968,256233,252
Luis A. Ubiñas201925,43525,435
(1)The amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of restricted Common SharesShare awards granted during 2015.2019. Each Directordirector serving in 20152019 was granted 4,5007,593 restricted Common Shares with a grant date fair value of $38.55$21.73 per share. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these values may be found in Note 17 to our 20152019 audited consolidated financial statements on pages F-45F-43 through F-46F-47 of our 20152019 Annual Report. The aggregate number of unvested restricted Common Shares held by directors, as of December 31, 2015,2019, totaled 30,99678,286 Common Shares and for each director, except Mr. Citrinfor Ms. Skerritt and Mr. Henry,Ubiñas, consisted of the following: 1,6662,506 restricted Common Shares granted during 20142018 with a grant date fair value of $33.82$21.94 per share and 3,0007,593 restricted Common Shares granted during 20152019 with a grant date fair value of $38.55$21.73 per share. The aggregate number of unvested restricted Common Shares held by Mr. Citrin,Ms. Skerritt, as of December 31, 2015,2019, totaled 3,0007,593 restricted Common Shares granted during 20152019 with a grant date fair value of $38.55$21.73 per share. Mr. HenryUbiñas held no unvested restricted Common Shares as of December 31, 2015.
2019.
(2)Represents dividends paid on unvested restricted Common Shares or the value of deferred shares credited under our Director Deferred Share Program in respect of dividends.
(3)Mr. Citrin deferred all of his cash and equity compensation in 20152019 pursuant to our Director Deferred Share Program. Mr. Citrin received 6,096.9816,097.46 deferred shares in connection with 20152019 cash and equity compensation he elected to defer, including deferred shares earned from dividend reinvestment.
(4)Mr. DrapkinMs. Skerritt deferred all of hisher equity compensation in 20152019 pursuant to our Director Deferred Share Program. Mr. DrapkinMs. Skerritt received 5,067.928,098.06 deferred shares in connection with 20152019 equity compensation heshe elected to defer, including deferred shares earned from dividend reinvestment.
(5)Mr. Henry’s election to the Board of Directors was effective January 1, 2016 and he did not receive any compensation as a Director in 2015.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS ANDINSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, is charged with determining compensation for our CEO and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of our other officers. During the fiscal year endedyearended December 31, 2015,2019, Mr. Benton,Citrin, Mr. Reddin,Henry, Mr. Robinson, Reddin,Ms. Ryan-BermanandRyan-Berman and Mr. Schuman served as members of the CompensationtheCompensation and Human Capital Committee. No executive officer of the Company served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other committee performing equivalent functions) of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Board or the Compensation and Human Capital Committee.

18   

14

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy StatementNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction

INTRODUCTION

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee is responsible for the Company’s executive compensation philosophy and policies, as well as the annual executive compensation program that flows from them. This “Executive Compensation” section of the Proxy Statement contains a detailed explanation of the compensation arrangements for our NEOs for fiscal year 2015,2019, which were determined by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2019, our NEOs and their titles were as follows:

Steven B. Tanger - President and

Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)

Frank C. Marchisello, Jr. - James F. Williams

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)

Thomas E. McDonough - Executive Vice McDonough*

President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”President”)

Chad D. Perry -

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary (“GC”)

Lisa J. Morrison - Senior

Executive Vice President - Leasing


*On June 4, 2019, Thomas E. McDonough notified us of his intention to retire, effective December 31, 2019, as President of the Company. See page 50 for details regarding the Transition Agreement (as defined below) entered into between Mr. McDonough and the Operating Partnership, which sets forth the terms of his transition and retirement from the Company, effective as of December 31, 2019.

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis includes the following sections:

1

Executive Summary (page 16)- Summarizes efforts to engage shareholders on “Say On Pay”with regard to “Say-On-Pay”, additional compensation actions, pay-for-performance alignment for the CEO, CEO/NEO pay mix, business highlights our executive compensation program,and total shareholder return and CEO pay mix.
return.

3
2019 Compensation Review Process- Outlines the role of the Compensation Committee, compensation consultant and CEO in developing appropriate compensation programs for our NEOs.

Fiscal Year 2015 Compensation - Discusses and analyzes the Compensation Committee’s specific decisions for fiscal year 2015.

Elements of Compensation(page 30)- Provides a more detailed description of our compensation program as applied to our NEOs.

2
Compensation Review Process (page 24)- Outlines the role of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, compensation consultant and CEO in developing appropriate compensation programs for our NEOs.
4
Governance Policies Relating to Compensation (page 38)- Details other governance policies and processes related to our executive compensation program.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM15


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

We are a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed REIT, which focuses on developing, acquiring, owning, operating and managing upscale outlet shopping centers in the US and Canada. We are the only public pure-play outlet center REIT and have a primary objective to maximize TSR through growth in funds from operations and asset value appreciation. The Company has over 39 years of outlet center experience and our executives have a proven skill set in securing the best sites, constructing high-quality properties on time, completing the timely and effective lease-up of centers, and curating a compelling mix of tenants, while maintaining high occupancy and operating and marketing highly successful outlet centers.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee strongly believes that our executive compensation program represents a thoughtful, balanced program with a pay-for-performance structure that focuses on Company performance and reflects the feedback of our shareholders. Our executive compensation program is designed to motivate, attract and retain highly-qualified executives with this unique and proven skill set and to align the CEO and other NEOs’ interests with those of our shareholders. In years that our shareholder value has increased, compensation for our CEO and other NEOs has generally increased. Conversely, in years that our shares have underperformed, compensation for our CEO and other NEOs has generally declined. We believe that such alignment is strongly evidenced by the 2019 compensation and the current outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs.

2019 COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

As of December 31, 2019, our TSR over the past ten and twenty years was 13% and 718%, respectively, and approximately 1,030% since going public. We continued to face significant industry headwinds during 2019 characterized by additional tenant bankruptcies and store closures and causing us to early recapture approximately 198,000 square feet in our consolidated portfolio. Nevertheless, due to a strong leasing and marketing performance, we achieved a high year-end occupancy rate of 97% and were able to continue to drive increases in traffic and sales, which in turn resulted in significantly better than originally expected performance in AFFO per share and Same CenterNOI. With respect to our Incentive Cash Bonus Plan (see “2019Compensation - Annual Cash Incentives: Description andAnalysis”), we achieved the maximum AFFO performance metric and between target and maximum Same Center NOI metric.Due to a successful completion of the sale of four non-core properties, the proceeds of which were used to pay down debt, we were able to achieve a leverage ratio between the target and maximum goals. As a result of this strong performance, our CEO’s cash bonus under the Incentive Cash Bonus Plan for fiscal 2019 was 58.2% higher than the cash bonus received for fiscal 2018.

Following the completion of an extensive shareholder outreach program, which we discuss below, the CEO’s equity compensation for awards granted in 2019 was reduced 21% compared to 2018 and the allocation of the equity award tied to performance was increased from 46% to 60% (See “Shareholder Engagement and Listening to our Shareholders”).

The performance period of our outperformance plan approved in 2017 (“2017 OPP”) ended in February 2020. The Company fell short of the minimum TSR goals under the 2017 OPP, and no awards were earned, resulting in a forfeiture of over $5.3 million in value by our CEO. In addition, in light of our TSR in 2019, the absolute and relative portions of the remaining outperformance plans approved in 2018 and 2019 (“2018 OPP” and “2019 OPP”), the performance periods of which are approximately two-thirds and one-third completed, respectively, currently are underwater and projected to have zero value.

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND LISTENING TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS

We have historically taken into consideration the results of our advisory votes on the Company’s executive compensation program and NEO compensation decisions, and since 2014, we have proactively engaged in ongoing shareholder outreach in order to hear feedback about our executive compensation program directly from shareholders.

At the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, approximately 93% of votes cast approved, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, of our executive compensation (commonly referred to as “Say-on-Pay”) and approximately 7% of votes cast voted against the Say-on-Pay proposal. This level of support was a significant increase from the 2018 vote, in which approximately 42% of votes cast were in favor of this proposal.

16NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Say-On-Pay Approval Percentages Since 2015

The 2019 results occurred after we made changes to our incentive programs in February of 2019 following an extensive shareholder outreach effort, preceding the 2019 Annual Meeting, in order to better understand our investors’ views regarding our executive compensation programs. The outreach efforts were led by Mr. David Henry, the Chair of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee at that time, together with the Chair of the Board at that time, Mr. Thomas Reddin, along with the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s independent compensation consultant, FPL, and members of management (excluding the Chief Executive Officer). We reached out to our 24 largest institutional shareholders who collectively owned approximately 80% (and spoke with and received feedback from shareholders representing 60%) of our outstanding Common Shares. These discussions allowed us to solicit individualized shareholder feedback on our compensation program and practices.

While investors generally supported the overall design and framework of our executive compensation system and acknowledged the positive changes that have been made over the years, in light of recent declining share price performance, we heard concerns and received valuable feedback regarding the magnitude of the CEO’s equity grant, and the portion of that grant that was not performance-based.As we value the feedback provided by our investors, the Board took action to specifically address their concerns while still maintaining a compensation program focused on retaining and motivating our executives.The Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes that the 2019 compensation changes described in the table below reflect our Board’s ongoing commitment to shareholder engagement and responsiveness.

What We HeardHow We Responded

The magnitude of the CEO’s grant does not align with peers, particularly in an environment of subpar performance.

We reduced the value of the CEO’s 2019 equity grant by 21% as compared to the value of his 2018 equity grant.

A higher allocation of the CEO’s equity grant should be tied to performance-based vesting.

We increased the allocation of the 2019 award tied to performance by 31%, as now a majority (60%) of the awarded grant date fair value is tied to performance (up from 46%in 2018)

A lower allocation of the CEO’s equity grant should be tied to time-based vesting.

We decreased the allocation of the 2019 award tied solely to service by approximately 26%, as now a minority (40%) of the awarded grant date fair value is tied solely to service (down from 54% in 2018).


Executive SummaryWWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM17


ListeningTable of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The illustration below outlines the magnitude of the changes in the grant date fair value of CEO equity awards from 2018 to Shareholder Say-on-Pay Votes

Our shareholders have historically supported2019. In addition, given the Company’s executiveoperating results and share price performance achieved in 2019, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee determined that the CEO’s equity compensation program. We believe this support is basedshould not be increased in 2020 and kept the CEO’s equity compensation, in terms of both grant date value and mix of performance-based versus time-based, the same as 2019.

CEO 2018 Equity Awards

Total LTI Award:
$4,598,606

=

Performance-Based (46%)
$2,111,479

+

Time-Based (54%)
$2,487,127

21% Decrease ($)

4% Increase ($)

41% Decrease ($)

CEO 2019 Equity Awards

Total LTI Award:
$3,654,909

=

Performance-Based (60%)
$2,192,945

+

Time-Based (40%)
$1,461,964

No increase or change in
allocation from 2019-2020

=

=

=

CEO 2020 Equity Awards

Total LTI Award:
$3,654,919

=

Performance-Based (60%)
$2,192,949

+

Time-Based (40%)
$1,461,970

Based on the fact that the Company’s long-term returns are among the highest in the REIT industry. Our shareholders supportedresults of our executive compensation program again in 2015, when the Company received advisory approval of its named executive officer compensation, but not by a margin that the Company deemed satisfactory - 66.2%.

In order to better understand how to increase shareholder satisfaction withvotes on the Company’s NEO compensation and discussions held over the Company has engaged in ongoing shareholder outreach. In 2015,past several years, we reached out tohave made a number of our shareholders, who collectively owned approximately 69% of our outstanding Common Shares. We arranged a total of nine meetings with institutional investors, representing many of the largest shareholders who responded to our outreach efforts and expressed interest in meeting with us. These investors collectively owned approximately 35% of our outstanding Common Shares.

In our outreach efforts, we heard shareholders express the following key themes:

Our Cash Bonus Plan was based on 10 factors, which were too many;

TSR should not be a performance metric for purposes of the cash bonus plan;

The allocation of equity awards should be more heavily weighted towards performance-based equity awards and less to time-based equity awards; and

Performance-based equity awards should be more heavily weighted towards relative performance hurdles and less towards absolute performance hurdles.


As a result of shareholder feedback and additional work with our independent compensation consultants, our Compensation Committee made the followingpositive changes to our executive compensation program:program as summarized below:

2020

Simplified

No increase in compensation for NEOs compared to 2019
Increased minimum share ownership guidelines for independent directors
Modified our peer group to better align the Cash Bonus Plan for 2016, using four key performance factors, rather than 10;

Company with peers of similar size

www.tangeroutlets.com   2019

   19




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Removed TSR as a performance metric for purposesReduced the grant date fair value of the cash bonus plan during 2015;

CEO’s equity compensation by approximately 21%

ReducedFurther increased the numberallocation of time-based equity awards relative to performance-based equity awards grantedfor all NEOs to 60%

Reduced our CEO’s time-based restricted common share awards by approximately $1 million in 2016 for 2015 performance; and

Changed our 2016 OPP to reflect a 50/50 split between absolute and relative TSR hurdles.


Additional Compensation Actions

In addition to the changes that we made based on shareholder feedback, the Company also did the following:

Adopted a robust anti-pledging policy that generally prohibits executive officers, directors, and employees from pledging Company securities as collateral for margin loansgrant date fair value or other transactions;

41%

Based approximately 83% of the CEO’stotal compensation on variable, or at risk, Company performance metrics; and

Continued to impose a mandatory three-year holding period after vesting for equity grants made to the CEO, consistent with all awards subsequent to 2013

2018
Further modified our annual OPP to a 67/33 split between relative and absolute TSR hurdles to further emphasize relative performance versus absolute performance
The Relative TSR component of the 2018 OPP was shifted from the use of a broader REIT index (SNL U.S. Equity Index) to that of an industry-specific index (FTSE NAREIT Retail Index), which is expected to more closely correlate with the performance of the retail REIT industry
2017
Further condensed the number of metrics used in our annual cash incentive plan to 3 key financial performance objectives
Based approximately 87% of the CEO’s February 2015total compensation on Company performance
2016
Decreased the number of metrics used in the annual cash incentive plan from 8 financial performance objectives to 4 key financial performance objectives
Modified our annual OPP to a 50/50 split between absolute and relative TSR hurdles to be more heavily weighted towards relative performance hurdles
Modified CEO employment agreement to require a double-trigger for accelerated vesting of time-based restricted shares in connection with a change in control
Unlike the special grants awarded in connection with the CEO’s 2012 employment contract amendment, we did not provide additional special awards in connection with the 2016 restrictedemployment agreement
2015
Adopted a robust anti-pledging policy
Increased the allocation of performance-based equity grants.

awards versus time-based awards

18NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

BusinessCEO Compensation Highlights

2020 and 2019 base
salary held flat with
2018 at $850,000

We continue to have an additional
three-year mandatory holding period
post-vesting on equity awards

2019 cash bonus payout
increased 58% from 2018

Decrease in grant date fair
value of equity awards
from 2018 to 2019. 2020
kept flat with 2019.

0% of OPP awards were earned for the most recently completed
performance cycle (2016-2019); the outstanding OPPs are also
tracking at 0% payouts based on performance, which aligns a
substantial portion of our CEO’s pay to investor returns


We believeSUMMARY OF CEO DIRECT COMPENSATION

The following table highlights the components of compensation that the Compensation and Human Capital Committee deemed most important in considering year-over-year changes to compensation for our CEO. Thus, for direct comparison purposes, total direct compensation excludes dividends on unvested restricted Common Shares and “other” compensation (see "2019 Summary Compensation Table" on page 41 for items included in "other" compensation).

    Year    Salary
($)
    Cash
Bonus
($)
    Time-Based
LTI Awards
($)
    Performance-Based
LTI Awards
($)
    Total Direct
Compensation
($) (1)
Steven B. Tanger, CEO2019$850,000$1,506,462$1,461,964$2,192,945$6,011,371
2018850,000952,0002,487,1272,111,4796,400,606
% Change—%58.2%(41.2)%3.9%(6.1)%
(1)For direct comparison purposes, excludes dividends paid on unvested Common Shares and “other” amounts.

PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE ALIGNMENT (CEO FOCUS)

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes that an executive compensation program that strongly links both the short-term and long-term performance of the Company whichand the compensation of our executive officers is focuseda key driver of our long-term financial success. We have designed an effective pay-for-performance program whereby a significant portion of our executive officer’s compensation is tied to performance-based cash and equity awards. Thus, in periods where we have superior performance in our operating results and TSR, our executive officers will realize higher levels of compensation. Likewise, in periods of poor performance, our executives will realize significantly lower levels of compensation.

Due to total shareholder returns that have lagged our peers and in some cases have been negative on long-term shareholderan absolute basis, our CEO’s total realized compensation over the last several years has been significantly less than the reported grant date fair value creation, achieved some of the best operational resultsawards for those respective years.

REALIZED PAY

Annual compensation data shown in its historythe Summary Compensation Table on page 41 is presented in 2015. Our reputation within the industry of having a quality portfolio of outlet centers and a refined skill set for developing, leasing, operating and marketing them, continues to drive tenant demand for space in Tanger Outlet Centers.

This demand afforded us the opportunity to open four new Tanger Outlet Centers in 2015, which expanded our total footprint by nearly 1.4 million square feet, or over 10%. We currently have two development projects under construction scheduled to open in 2016 that will addan additional 707,000 square feet to our portfolio. We believe our strong tenant relationships, our expertise in site selection, permitting and the entitlement process, our operational and customer service excellence, and a strong balance sheet have provided a true competitive advantage.

Regarding our 2015 earnings, AFFO per share, which is FFO adjusted to eliminate certain items that we believe are not indicative of our on-going operating performance, increased 13% for the year to $2.22 per share, compared to $1.97 per share the prior year. This year over year increase was primarily driven by our ability to increase rental rates on renewals and released space within our core portfolio, and by growing our portfolio of properties through new developments and expansions during 2015 and 2014. AFFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe to be an important supplemental indicator of our operating performance. For a discussion of FFO and AFFO, including a reconciliation to GAAP, please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filedaccordance with the Securities and Exchange CommissionCommission’s (“SEC”) requirements. This mandated format is based on February 23, 2016, beginning on page 60.

Our growth allowed usaccounting rules that reflect the grant date fair value of the award at the time of grant, which can differ significantly from the value that is ultimately earned from these awards. Therefore, the Committee believes that utilizing realized compensation in its evaluation of CEO pay is an appropriate additional consideration to raise our quarterly dividend by 19% in April 2015. This markedaccurately measure the 22nd consecutive annual dividend increase since we become a public company.

While our Company generated a -8.15% total shareholder return in 2015, we believe that the true value creation produced from an investment in real estate should be assessed over a long-term horizon. For the five-year, seven-year, 10-year and 20-year periods ended December 31, 2015, our total shareholder return was 48%, 118%, 220% and 1,612%, respectively. Tanger also ranked third among all public mall REITs in total shareholder return for both the 10-year and 20-year periods.

Despite these achievements, the total direct compensation for thealignment of CEO in 2015 decreased by 9.7% from 2014. See “Total Shareholder Return” on page 24 for further discussion of performance accomplishments used to set 2015 compensation.

Compensation Highlights

For 2015, our compensation program for NEOs includes the following key elements:pay-for-performance.

Pay ElementCompensation TypeWWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COMObjective and Key Features19


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation TableRealized Compensation

Concept:

Concept:

Uses SEC methodology, which utilizes a mix of both compensation actually earned during the year (base salary and annual bonus) and some future contingent pay opportunities (equity awards)

Includes only pay actually earned during the year

Purpose:

Purpose:

SEC-mandated compensation disclosure

Used to show the strength of the correlation between Tanger’s performance and the actual cash and equity payouts earned by our CEO during the year

How it is Calculated:

How it is Calculated:

Base Salarysalarypaid during the year

Base salarypaid during the year

+

+

Annual bonusearned for the applicable (current) year’s performance

Annual bonusearned for the applicable (current) year’s performance

+

+

Accounting grant date fair value ofequity awardsgranted during the most recently completed fiscal year (i.e., prior year)

Fixed
Value of
CashOutperformance Plan equity awardsearned during the most recently completed 3-year performance period and the year-end value of theAnnual Long-Term Equity Incentivesthat vested during the current fiscal year

Objective
Salaries are set at a level that reflects job responsibilities and to provide competitive fixed pay to balance performance-based risks.

Key Features
NEO base salaries were increased in 2015 by 3% over 2014 amounts, which we believe is generally consistent with increases at similar performing REITs.
2016 base salaries remain unchanged from 2015 amounts for the CEO and EVPs. 2016 base salary for Ms. Morrison was increased by 3% over her 2015 amount.

20   +

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement+

All other compensation

All other compensation

CEO Total Compensation - Summary Compensation Table vs. Realized Compensation
(in $ thousands)

Our CEO participates in multi-year award programs that are based exclusively on the Company’s three-year absolute and relative TSR to directly align our CEO’s compensation to that of shareholder returns. As of December 31, 2019, the OPP award granted in 2016 concluded with the performance periods ongoing for the OPP awards granted in 2017 through 2019.

The chart below illustrates what our CEO has realized from the completed program and what the outstanding programs would have paid out had they been concluded as of year-end 2019. Of the total potential OPP award value over the four programs, in aggregate, our CEO has earned, and is tracking to earn for those OPPs outstanding, approximately zero value.

20NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pay ElementEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

CEO OPP Award Values: 2016 OPP Realized Value & 2017, 2018, 2019 OPP Tracking Value

TSR-Based OPP Award Status

The chart below depicts each OPP on a program-by-program basis and the amounts realized or projected to be earned based on the Company’s TSR performance as of December 31, 2019. All three of the current OPPs resulted in zero value to the executives. The 2017, 2018 and 2019 OPPs are currently projected to deliver no value.

LTIP Performance
Period and Metrics
Weight201720182019202020212022%
Payout
2017 OPP96% Completed
Absolute TSR50%Tracking Below Threshold
and 100% projected to be Forfeited
0.0%
Relative TSR vs. SNL U.S.
Equity REIT Index
50%Tracking Below Threshold
and 100% projected to be Forfeited
0.0%
Maximum Potential
Value of Award
$0$5,345,802
 
 
         
Total0.0%
2018 OPP62% Completed
Absolute TSR33%Tracking Below Threshold
and 100% projected to be Forfeited
0.0%
Relative TSR vs. FTSE
NAREIT Retail Index
67%Tracking Below Threshold
and 100% projected to be Forfeited
0.0%
Maximum Potential
Value of Award
$0 $4,068,027
 
 
         
Total0.0%
2019 OPP29% Completed
Absolute TSR33%Tracking Below Threshold
and 100% projected to be Forfeited
0.0%
Relative TSR vs. FTSE
NAREIT Retail Index
67%Tracking Below Threshold
and 100% projected to be Forfeited
0.0%
Maximum Potential
Value of Award
$0   $4,258,920
 
 
         
Total0.0%

Compensation TypeWWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COMObjective and Key Features21

Annual Cash
Incentives

Variable
Incentive
Cash

Objective
Annual cash incentives are designed to incentivize management to achieve the Company’s strategic financial goals for the year utilizing a formulaic calculation.

Key Features
Payout on 80% of plan determined by the achievement of financial performance hurdles established early in the fiscal year, with the remaining 20% determined based on the Compensation Committee’s review of individual/subjective performance criteria also established early in the fiscal year.
The performance criteria are designed to motivate the achievement of short-term goals that we believe will ultimately translate into an increase in the equity value of the Company and, at the time set, the Compensation Committee believed the targets would be challenging and difficult, but achievable with significant effort and skill in light of the condition of the overall economy at that time.
The 2015 maximum bonus potential as a percentage of Base Salary for each executive remained the same as 2014. In addition, the 2016 maximum bonus potential as a percentage of Base Salary remained the same as 2015.

Restricted
Common Share
Awards

Variable
Incentive
Equity

Objective
Grants structured to reward for prior year performance and support the retention of senior management, while subjecting recipients to the same market fluctuations as shareholders and thereby motivating management to create long-term shareholder value.

Key Features
The grant size is determined based on a detailed review of TSR performance, execution of the Company’s long-term strategic plan and the historical number of restricted Common Shares granted to each NEO.
In 2015, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of time-based restricted Common Shares to our NEOs for fiscal 2014 performance. For the CEO, these shares represented approximately 53% of his equity awards.
In 2016, the Compensation Committee approved a reduction in the number of time-based restricted Common Shares granted to our CEO and EVPs for 2015 performance, compared to the number granted in 2015 for 2014 performance.
The Committee approved the same number of time-based restricted Common Shares for the SVP - Leasing for 2015 and 2014 performance.
Time-based restricted Common Shares granted to the CEO and EVPs in 2016 vest ratably over a four-year period, compared to a five-year period for grants in 2015, subject to continued employment. All time-based restricted Common Shares vest ratably over a five-year period for Ms. Morrison, subject to continued employment.
Restricted Common Shares granted to the CEO include a mandatory holding period under which the CEO cannot sell his vested Common Shares for an additional three years following the applicable vesting date.

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   21




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pay ElementEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

SIGNIFICANT AT-RISK COMPENSATION

A substantial portion of our CEO and NEOs’ pay is tied to company performance and is at risk. Approximately 39% of our CEO’s performance year 2019 compensation was paid in cash, and approximately 86% was variable, subject to the Company’s performance. Across our remaining NEOs (excluding our former President, Mr. McDonough, who retired on December 31, 2019), the average 2019 performance year amount paid in cash was approximately 53% and approximately 77% was variable, subject to the Company’s performance.

2019 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

As of December 31, 2019, our TSR over the past ten and twenty years was 13% and 718%, respectively, and approximately 1,030% since going public. During 2019, we faced similar industry headwinds that many of our peers experienced, particularly related to several retailer bankruptcies and brand-wide restructurings, that resulted in the Company recapturing approximately 198,000 square feet in its consolidated portfolio during the year. With strong leasing execution, we succeeded in accomplishing one of our key strategic goals of keeping our centers highly occupied with desirable tenants. This success, along with our enhanced marketing programs which focused on growing our loyalty program and highlighting the social element of shopping by conducting portfolio-wide experiential events throughout the year, we were able to achieve better than expected results for Same Center NOI, traffic and sales.

We are proud of these achievements as they point to our ability to strategically position the Company to withstand these current headwinds. Among other achievements in 2019, our executive officers and other dedicated employees led the Company to realize the following results:

Compensation Type22Objective and Key FeaturesNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Outperformance
Plan (OPP)

Variable
Incentive
At-Risk
Equity

Objective
The OPP is designed to enhance our pay-for-performance structure and shareholder alignment, while motivating and rewarding senior management for superior TSR performance based on rigorous absolute and relative hurdles.

Key Features
Only provides tangible value to our executives upon the creation of meaningful shareholder value above specified hurdles over a three-year measurement period.
Awards granted in 2015 for fiscal 2014 performance were allocated 60/40 between absolute hurdles and relative hurdles under the 2015 Outperformance Plan. The absolute and relative hurdles (and the related allocation between these hurdles) were adjusted in the 2016 OPP (as noted below).
Awards granted in 2016 for fiscal 2015 performance are allocated 50/50 between absolute hurdles and relative hurdles under the 2016 OPP.
For the 2016 OPP, absolute hurdle requires a return equal to or above 18% over a three-year measurement period, with a 35% return necessary to earn the full value under the absolute component.
For the 2016 OPP, relative hurdle requires equal to or above the 40th percentile of the constituents of the SNL US Equity REIT Index over a three-year measurement period, with performance equal to or above the 70th percentile to earn the full value under the relative component.
Full payout is earned only if both the Absolute and Relative TSR hurdles are achieved, and then half of the award is subjected to an additional year of time-based vesting.

Compensation
Governance

Risk Management

Objective
Policies and plan features are designed to discourage behavior that could lead to excessive risk-taking.

Key Features
Limits on annual cash incentive compensation so that cash bonuses may not exceed set percentages of base salary (200% for the CEO). Minimum ownership guidelines for NEOs and directors, with a 10x base salary requirement for our CEO.
Clawback policy applicable to our executive officers that allows for the recoupment of incentive awards under certain circumstances.
Anti-hedging policy that prohibits any executive officer or director from trading in puts, calls, options or other derivative securities of the Company.
Anti-pledging policy that restricts the pledging of securities of the Company.
Mandatory holding period for our CEO for three years following the vesting date of restricted Common Shares granted since 2013.

22   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Net IncomeNet income available to common shareholders was $0.93 per share, or $86.5 million, compared to $0.45 per share, or $42.4 million, for the prior year.
AFFO*AFFO available to common shareholders was $2.31 per share for the year ended December 31, 2019, or $226.1 million, compared to $2.48 per share, or $243.3 million, for the prior year.
Same Center NOI*Same Center NOI for the consolidated portfolio decreased 0.7% for the year ended December 31, 2019 due primarily to the impact of additional tenant bankruptcies, lease modifications and store closures.
Occupancy97.0% occupied consolidated portfolio at year-end 2019 (compared to 96.8% on December 31, 2018), marking the 39th consecutive year with year-end occupancy of 95% or greater.
Quarterly Common Share Cash DividendsRaised dividend in February 2019 by 1.4% on an annualized basis to $1.42 per share, marking our 26thconsecutive annual dividend increase. Since becoming a public company in May 1993, the Company has paid a cash dividend each quarter and has increased its dividend each year.
Average Tenant SalesAverage tenant sales productivity for the consolidated portfolio was $395 per square foot for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $385 per square foot in the comparable prior year period.
Same Center Tenant SalesSame center tenant sales performance for the overall portfolio increased 1.5% for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018.
Asset DispositionsSold four non-core properties and used the net proceeds of $128.2 million to repay outstanding balances under our unsecured lines of credit.
Interest Coverage RatioMaintained strong interest coverage ratio of 4.3 and 4.5 times for 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Occupancy costOccupancy cost ratio for the trailing twelve months ended December 31, 2019 was 10.0%, lowest among the public mall REITs.
*AFFO and Same Center NOI are financial measures that the Company’s management believes to be important supplemental indicators of our operating performance and which are used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, but are not measures computed in accordance with GAAP. For a discussion of AFFO and Same Center NOI including a reconciliation to GAAP, please see Appendix A.

As of December 31, 2019, we had reduced our total outstanding consolidated debt by approximately $143.1 million from the amount outstanding as of December 31, 2018. In addition, we had no amounts outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit, which provide for borrowings up to $600 million, and outstandingfloating rate debt totaled approximately $11.4 million, representingless than 1% of total consolidated debt. Approximately 94% of our consolidated square footage was unencumbered. As ofDecember 31, 2019,our outstanding debt had a weighted average interest rate of 3.5% and a weighted average term to maturity, including extension options, of approximately 5.5 years with no significant maturities until December 2023.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

CEO Pay-for-Performance Alignment

The Company’s commitmentThanks in part to pay-for-performance is illustrated by the total compensation paidthese operational results, we were able to return additional value to our CEO. The graph below illustrates total compensation paid to our CEO since 2011 andshareholders in 2019. We repurchased approximately 1.2 million Common Shares totaling $20.0 million during the TSR onyear at a $100 investmentweighted average price of $16.52 per share, leaving approximately $80.0 million available under the existing share repurchase authorization atDecember 31, 2019. In January 2020, the Company’s Board ofDirectors approved a 0.7%, or $0.01 per share, increase in the Company madeannualized dividend on January 1, 2011. As a resultofits common shares to $1.43 per share, marking the fact that approximately 83% of our CEO’s total compensation is performance-based and/or significantly tied to the Company’s share price performance, we believe our compensation has aligned with our TSR performance over the long-term period.

The above graph is based on actual compensation earned during each fiscal year and, we believe, more accurately reflects the27thconsecutive annual decisions of the Compensation Committee with respect to our CEO’s compensation than the Summary Compensation Table presented on page 42 because our annual long-term equity incentive awards for a particular year are generally granted in February of the following year based on performance for the prior year. These grants are presented as compensation for the year in which they are granted (rather than earned) in the Summary Compensation Table, consistent with SEC rules.

Total compensation for the years 2012 through 2015 includes $1,144,633 in each year, representing the annualized value of the 45,000 fully vested Common Shares, 90,000 time-based Common Shares and the 90,000 performance-based Common Shares granted pursuant to the CEO’s February 2012 employment agreement.

For direct comparison purposes, total 2014 compensation excludes dividends of $415,796 paid during 2014 on unvested restricted Common Shares issued as a result of the conversion of notional units awarded under the 2010 Multi-Year Performance Plan. The 2010 Multi-Year Performance Plan was a four-year performance plan under which recipients earned the maximum number of restricted Common Shares based on the Company achieving a greater than 60% share price appreciation during the four year performance period ending December 31, 2013. The restricted Common Shares earned were issued in January 2014 and vested on December 31, 2014, following the completion of a one-year vesting period.dividend increase.

www.tangeroutlets.com   WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

23




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Total Shareholder ReturnTOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN

We believe that the true value creation produced from an investment in real estate should be assessed over a long-term horizon, and our strategy has focused on long-term value creation. Accordingly, the graph below compares the cumulative total return onIn fact, our Common SharesTSR over the past ten and twenty years was 13% and 718%, respectively, and approximately 1,030% since going public.

Over the 1-year and 3-year periods ending December 31, 2019, our returns to our shareholders (on both an absolute and relative basis) declined primarily due to the cumulative returncurrent challenging retail environment. Accordingly, as a reflection of comparableindices assumingthe pay-for-performance structure of our overall compensation plan, a $100 investmentsignificant portion of our CEO’s compensation (and that of our other NEOs) has been forfeited. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes that incentivizing the management team to continue to focus on December 31, 2005, and assuming all dividends were reinvested. A $100 investmentdriving superior operating performance, will ultimately result in the Company would have increased to $320 on December 31, 2015 and would have outperformed an investment in each index over the same period as detailed below.creation of strong long-term shareholder value.

Comparison of $100 Investment Over the Past TenThree Years

December 31,  2005  2007  2009  2011  2013  2015
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.$100.00$141.65$159.45$255.88$294.24$320.47
SNL US Equity REIT Index$100.00$113.89$93.12$130.01$162.14$212.43
SNL US Retail REIT Index$100.00$109.71$79.56$116.98$154.86$206.07
Russell 3000$100.00$121.66$97.89$115.64$179.79$203.33

Over the 10-year period ending December 31, 2015, we have delivered positive returns to our shareholders. While over the shorter-term periods we have trailed our peers’ performance, we have meaningfully outperformed over the longer-term periods that our Compensation Committee focuses on, including being in the top third percentile ofperformance in our Executive Compensation Peer Group over the 10-year period. The chart below compares our TSR, as of December 31, 2015, to the index of equity REITs prepared by SNL Financial. The chart also shows where our total return performance ranked compared to our executive compensation peer group.

Total shareholder return:   1 Year   3 Year   5 Year   7 Year   10 Year   Since
IPO
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.     (8)%     5%          48%         118%         220%     1,873%
SNL Equity REIT Index3%      36%77%194%112%934%
Executive Compensation Peer Group Median7% 47%90%200%101%1,137%

CEO Pay Mix

The Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of compensation should be at-risk and heavily dependent upon the achievement of rigorous, objectiveperformance goals. As illustrated below, approximately 83% of our CEO’s total compensation is performance based, at risk and/or variable, subject to the company’s performance

24   

2

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

results. Although the Compensation Committee does not target any particular peer group percentile, the overall structure is designed so that if the Company’s performance exceeds expectations and is above its peers, the result should be overall compensation that is at the high end of the peer range and favorable to compensation availableat successful competitors. Conversely, if the Company’s performance is below expectations and peer levels, the result should be overall compensation that is at the low end of the peer range and is lower than compensation paid at more successful competitors.

For 2015 performance, total compensation was allocated as follows:

Chief Executive Officer 2015 Pay Mix

Amounts reflected in the chart above under Long-Term Incentive Awards are based on each award’s grant date fair value, which, as computed under GAAP, is generally higher for time-based awards than performance-based awards. In determining the appropriate allocation between time-based and performance-based awards, the Compensation Committee also considered the relative number of awards granted in addition to the grant date fair value. In 2016, based on the Company’s 2015 operating performanceand the feedback received from our shareholder outreach program, the Committee decided to reduce the number of restricted Common Shares to be issued as time-based equity awards relative to performance-based equity awards granted for 2015 performance. The chart below compares the mix of performance-based awards (assuming the maximum number of restricted Common Shares are earned) and time-based awards granted for both 2014 performance and 2015 performance.

CEO Mix of Equity Awards

Restricted Common Shares Awarded     2014     % of Total Award     2015     % of Total Award
Performance-Based(1)103,00047.2%135,37559.4%
Time-Based115,00052.8%92,71240.6%
Total218,000228,087

(1)       Represents restricted Common Shares to be issued if maximum performance hurdles are met.

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   25




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Review ProcessCOMPENSATION REVIEW PROCESS

Compensation Program ObjectivesCOMPENSATION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the Company’s compensation program are as follows:

Motivate, attract and retain qualified executive management employees who are enthusiastic about the Company’s mission, performance, and culture;

Create a fair, reasonable and balanced compensation program that rewards management’s performance and contribution to the Company while closely aligning the interests of management with those of shareholders; and

Provide total compensation to executive officers that is competitive with total compensation paid by other REITs, and other private real estate firms similar to the Company.


Compensation Program RewardsCOMPENSATION PROGRAM REWARDS

The Company’s compensation program rewards teamwork and the individual officer’s contributionofficer contributions to the Company’s annual and longer-termlonger term goals. Annual cash performance-based incentives reward Company financial performance and individual performance for the fiscal year. In measuring an individual officer’s and the overall team’s performance, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee considers numerous factors, including the Company’s growth in FFOAFFO and Same Center NOI from the prior year its success in renewing a significant number of the leases expiring during the year, increases obtained in tenant base rents upon executing renewals or new leases, overall occupancy rate maintained at year end,and the debt to asset ratio, and customer traffic.ratio. While the individual amounts of incentive compensation incentives paid may vary among officers, the performance targets that are set are generally the same for all officers. This creates an environment where all officers work together to achieve a common goal. See “Annual“2019 Compensation - Annual Cash Incentives: Description and Analysis” on page 31 for further discussion of performance targets used to set 20152019 compensation. Equity-basedAdditionally, equity-based awards are designed to provide long-term incentives designed tothat reward price appreciation of our Common Shares over a multi-year period.

Additionally, weWe also believe that the Company’s executive compensation program does not encourage excessive risk taking. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee has incorporated the following risk-oversight and compensation-design features to guard against excessive risk taking:

Review and approval of corporate objectives by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee to ensure that these goals are aligned with the Company’s annual operating and strategic plans, achieve the desired risk/reward balance, and do not encourage excessive risk taking;

Base salaries consistent with each executive’s responsibilities so that the executive is not motivated to take excessive risks to achieve a reasonable level of financial security;

A significant portion of each executive’s compensation is tied to the future share performance of the Company;

Equity compensation and vesting periods for equity awards that encourage executives to focus on sustained share price appreciation;

CEOThree-year holding period following vesting on all restricted Common Shares granted to our CEO since 2013;

Robust share ownership guidelines, Clawback Policy, Anti-hedging Policyclawback policy, anti-hedging policy and Anti-Pledginganti-pledging policy; and

A mix betweenof cash and equity compensation that is designed to encourage strategies and actions that are in the long-term best interests of the Company.


24NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Role of the Compensation CommitteeROLE OF THE COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE

The purposes and responsibilities of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the Board include the following:

Review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO, evaluate the CEO’s performance and determine and approve the CEO’s compensation level based on this evaluation;

Make recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of non-employee directors and officers other than the CEO;

Periodically review the Company’s incentive-compensation and equity-based plans and approve any new or materially amended equity-based plans; and

Oversee, with management, regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters, including the Company’s compensation policies with respect to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (referred to as the “Code”).

matters.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee may, in its discretion, delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee. In particular, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee may delegate the approval of certain equity awards to a subcommittee consisting solely of members of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee who are (1) “non-employee directors”for the purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) “outside directors” for the purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.Act.

Role ofROLE OF THE COMPENSATION CONSULTANT AND USE OF AGGREGATE PEER GROUP DATA

In setting compensation for fiscal 2019 performance, the Compensation Consultant and Use of Aggregate Peer Group Data

Since 2004, the CompensationHuman Capital Committee has engaged FPL, an independent compensation consultant, FTI Consulting, Inc. (“FTI”), to assist in determining the appropriate amounts, types and mix of executive compensation. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee, with the help of FTI,its independent compensation consultant, annually reviews the compensation practices of other REITs in order

26   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

to evaluate market trends and compare our compensation program with the compensation programs withof our competitors. Based in part on this data, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee develops a compensation plan that is intended to maintain the link between corporate performance and shareholder returns while being generally competitive within our industry.

Each fiscal year, management prepares tally sheetsan analysis that setsets forth the Company’s total compensation obligations to the CEO and the other officers, including each executive’s realized compensation from the prior year and targeted cash compensation for the coming year. FTI analyzesFPL analyzed this information for our NEOs, as well as the mix of fixed versus variable, short-term versus long-term and cash versus equity-based compensation of officers with similar duties and responsibilities, as well as similar rank within the NEO group, at the targeted peer group companies. The analysis focusesfocused on twothe following categories of compensation: (1) base salary, (2) base salary and incentive cash bonus together as total annual cash compensation, (3) long-term incentive compensation and (2)(4) total overall compensation.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee does not benchmark annual compensation to any specific percentile of total compensation paid to comparable officers in the peer group. Based on the Company’s and the individual’s overall performance relative to the peer group and the unique circumstances associated with any individual officer, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, in consultation with FTI, determines anFPL, determined the appropriate level of annual compensation. Although peer data is utilized in this process, we do not benchmark compensation to any particular peer group percentile for any of our NEOs.

In 2015, FTIFor fiscal 2019 performance, FPL recommended the level of base and incentive cash bonus compensation to be set for each officerNEO as well as the amount of equity awards to be granted to each officerNEO (or, if applicable, concluded that the recommendations of the CEO with respect to such other officer’s compensation were reasonable and within peer group standards), based on its review of peer data, industry trends, existing employment agreements and other factors. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee considered FTI’sFPL’s recommendations and analysis when determining base salaries and annual and long-term incentives.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee considers a variety of factors when constructing an appropriate peer set. As we are the only public focused factory outlet REIT, which requires certain unique skill sets, background, and relationships, we are forced to expand into the broader retail REIT industry for selecting appropriate peers. In selecting the targetedgraphic below we have identified several key factors the Committee considers when choosing an appropriate peer group, such as who the Company considers REITs based uponcompetes with for talent, tenants, and investors.

Direct Company Structure and Focus
Public Outlet Center Focused REITs:NONE
Public Retail-Focused REITs
Regional Malls, Shopping Centers, and Other Retail Focused Properties
Against whom does the Company compete for executive talent?
Across our executive team and prior to joining the Company, Mr. McDonough and Ms. Morrison, worked at Regency Centers Corporation and Taubman Centers, Inc. -both larger organizations and are two of our peers
Against whom does the Company compete for tenants and investors?
Our outlet centers have begun adding a new variety of tenants, thus competing with the shopping center REITs
While Taubman Centers has a primary focus on regional malls, it also holds outlet centers in their portfolio
Company Size (as defined by market and total capitalization, and number of employees)
The Compensation and Human Capital Committee contemplated additional companies that invest in similar markets to us, such as Simon Property Group, however, ultimately determined that in light of its substantially larger size, they would not be appropriate at this time

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM25


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee does not benchmark directly to the following characteristics: (1) industry sector, (2) market capitalization and (3) peer group, continuity from yearbut rather uses it as a frame of reference in determining executive compensation. The Committee will continue to year. In 2015,assess the Compensation Committee approved acomposition of the peer group comprisedto determine the appropriateness of REITs that invest in retail properties that are within 0.5x and 3.0x the size of the Company in terms of implied equity market capitalization. After review, the Compensation Committee determined to keep the 2015each peer group consistent with 2014, when meaningful adjustments were last made. company.

The following table provides the names and certain key information for each peer company at the time the Compensation and Human Capital Committee reviewed the peer group market datadata. Following recommendations from FPL we updated our peer group in late 2019 to better align the Company with peers of a similar size (though all still focused in the retail sector of thepublic REIT industry) by replacing Brixmor Property Group Inc., Kimco Realty Corporation, and Macerich Company with Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, Retail Properties of America, Inc., RPT Realty, and Saul Centers, Inc. Modifying the peer group allows us to continue to improve our compensation practices and minimize the risk of a size and pay misalignment. While we acknowledge there are no direct public outlet center competitors, we have continued to focus on October 19, 2015.

Implied EquityTotal Enterprise
Market CapValue
Company     $ million     $ million     Sector
Acadia Realty Trust       $2,375.8               $3,498.2        Shopping Centers
Brixmor Property Group, Inc.7,689.713,596.0Shopping Centers
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.2,968.39,179.1Regional Malls
DDR Corp.6,055.712,196.4Shopping Centers
Equity One, Inc.3,409.54,664.5Shopping Centers
Federal Realty Investment Trust10,177.611,769.3Shopping Centers
Kimco Realty Corporation10,857.015,809.2Shopping Centers
Kite Realty Group Trust2,224.04,204.5Shopping Centers
Macerich Company14,185.820,680.2Regional Malls
National Retail Properties, Inc.5,144.87,483.6Freestanding
Realty Income Corporation12,235.716,101.7Freestanding
Regency Centers Corporation6,300.08,265.3Shopping Centers
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.1,846.32,359.8Shopping Centers
Taubman Centers, Inc.6,628.88,845.0Regional Malls
Weingarten Realty Investors4,381.56,548.1Shopping Centers
WP Glimcher, Inc.2,709.45,456.7Regional Malls
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.$3,637.2$5,144.7Outlet Centers

DeterminationREITs operating within the retail industry. The new peer group includes eleven companies that cite us as a peer in their proxy statement, and all of the companies are listed in our Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.peer group. Compensation Consultant’s Objectivity.for 2019 utilized the former peer group shown below, while compensation for 2020 utilized the new peer group shown below.

PeersREMOVEDPeersADDED
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
Kimco Realty Corporation
Macerich Company
2019 Average Total Capitalization ($M): $11,950
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust
Retail Properties of America, Inc.
RPT Realty
Saul Centers, Inc.
2019 Average Total Capitalization ($M): $3,070

26NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

FORMER PEER GROUP

Company     # of
Employees (1)
      Implied Equity
Market Cap
$ million
      Total
Capitalization
$ million
      Sector
Acadia Realty Trust118    $2,387.3   $4,874.5Shopping Center
Brixmor Property Group Inc.4776,436.711,342.6Shopping Center
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.NA210.24,422.6Regional Mall
Federal Realty Investment Trust3119,802.813,604.9Shopping Center
Kimco Realty Corporation5028,961.814,896.1Shopping Center
Kite Realty Group Trust1331,681.02,865.4Shopping Center
Macerich Company7304,088.99,611.8Regional Mall
National Retail Properties, Inc.709,206.212,549.4Other Retail
Regency Centers Corporation45010,619.214,802.1Shopping Center
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.732,252.53,679.6Shopping Center
SITE Centers (formerly DDR Corp.)3612,714.84,930.9Shopping Center
Taubman Centers, Inc.4202,724.96,885.2Regional Mall
Urban Edge Properties1172,439.84,069.3Shopping Center
Washington Prime Group Inc.803806.54,080.3Regional Mall
Weingarten Realty Investors2394,065.46,018.6Shopping Center
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.461$1,440.6$3,101.7Outlet Center
(1)Consists of full-time-equivalent employees working for the company and its subsidiaries. Assumes two part-time employees equal one full-time employee, but excludes temporary employees.

As of December 31, 2019

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM27


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

NEW PEER GROUP

Company     # of
Employees (1)
     Implied Equity
Market Cap
$ million
     Total
Capitalization
$ million
     Sector
Acadia Realty Trust118         $2,387.3        $4,874.5     Shopping Center
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.NA210.24,422.6Regional Mall
Federal Realty Investment Trust3119,802.813,604.9Shopping Center
Kite Realty Group Trust1331,681.02,865.4Shopping Center
National Retail Properties, Inc.709,206.212,549.4Other Retail
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust274424.12,503.3Regional Mall
Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust (RPT)1041,229.72,272.0Shopping Center
Regency Centers Corporation45010,619.214,802.1Shopping Center
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.732,252.53,679.6Shopping Center
Retail Properties of America, Inc.2152,862.24,581.9Shopping Center
Saul Centers, Inc.1161,645.62,923.4Shopping Center
SITE Centers (formerly DDR Corp.)3612,714.84,930.9Shopping Center
Taubman Centers, Inc.4202,724.96,885.2Regional Mall
Urban Edge Properties1172,439.84,069.3Shopping Center
Weingarten Realty Investors2394,065.46,018.6Shopping Center
Washington Prime Group, Inc.803806.54,080.3Regional Mall
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.461$1,440.6$3,101.7Outlet Center
(1)Consists of full-time-equivalent employees working for the company and its subsidiaries. Assumes two part-time employees equal one full-time employee, but excludes temporary employees.

As of December 31, 2019

28NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION CONSULTANT’S OBJECTIVITY

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee recognizes that it is essential to receive objective advice from its outside independent compensation consultant. As a result, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee does not allow the Company to engage FTIFPL in matters unrelated to executive compensation.

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   27




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Role of Management and the Chief Executive Officer in Setting Executive CompensationROLE OF MANAGEMENT AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER IN SETTING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

On an annual basis, management considers market competitiveness, business results, experience and individual performance in evaluating executive compensation. The CEO is actively engaged in setting compensation for other executives through a variety of means, including recommending for Compensation and Human Capital Committee approval the financial performance goals for his executive team. He works closely with the CFO and GC in analyzing relevant market data to determine recommendations for base salary, annual bonus targets and equity compensation awards for other members of senior management. Targets are set in order to drive both annual performance and long-term value creation for shareholders. The CEO, CFO and CFOGC are generally subject to the same financial performance goals as the other officers, all of which are approved by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee will consider, but is not bound by and does not always accept, the recommendations of the CEO, CFO and CFOGC with respect to executive compensation.

Fiscal Year 2015 CompensationWWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM29


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

3
2019 COMPENSATION

We believe that the following discussion is a useful presentation of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s decisions on 2015with regard to 2019 NEO compensation, particularly in light of our practice of making annual long-term equity incentive awards for a particular year in February of the following year.compensation. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Summary Compensation Table presented on page 4241 where, in accordance with SEC rules, we present these grants as compensation for the year in which they were granted as opposed to the year for which they were earned.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee received information from FTIFPL, its compensation consultant, and management for consideration in determining the specific amounts of compensation to be provided to the executive officers for fiscal 20152019 performance. Among the factors considered for our executivesexecutive compensation generally, and for the NEOsNEO compensation in particular, are market competitiveness, company performance results, internal equity, past practice, experience and individual performance. There is no particular weight given to any factor, which may differ among individual NEOs, and instead factors are reviewed on a holistic basis.

Business results from the most recently completed fiscal year factor heavily in setting executive compensation. These results are reviewed and discussed by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee and its compensation consultants. Theconsultant. Payouts are generally based on actual financial results, measured against the targets approved by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee under our incentive compensation plans generally determine payouts under those plans for the fiscal year just ended. In addition, these results typically form the basis forare a consideration in setting performance targets for the next fiscal year. Based on the financial results presented by management, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee reviews the individual performance of the NEOs (other than the CEO) as reported by the CEO and approves their compensation for the current fiscal year.

In evaluating the performance of the CEO and setting his compensation, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee takes into account corporate financial performance, as well as performance on a range of non-financial factors, including accomplishment of strategic goals, workforce development and succession planning, and the CEO’s working relationship with the Board. See “Business“2019 Business Highlights” on page 422 for a summary of our operational achievements in 2015.

Actual Fiscal Year 2015 Compensation

Based on the peer group analysis, an assessment of the Company’s performance, and the input received from the Company’s on-going shareholder outreach program, the Compensation Committee approved 2015 total direct compensation for each NEO as set forth below.

28   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION2019.

The following table highlights the components of compensation the Committee deemed most important in considering year over year changes to compensation for each NEO. Thus, for direct comparison purposes, total direct compensation excludes dividends on unvested restricted Common Shares and “other” compensation, and for Mr. Tanger, the annualized value of the equity awards granted pursuant to his February 2012 employment agreement.

Named
Executive
Officer
     Performance
Year
     Salary     Annual
Cash
Incentives
     Annual
Grants of
Restricted
Common
Shares
(1)
     OPP(1)(2)     Total Direct
Compensation(3)(4)
Mr. Tanger2015$824,000$1,064,032$2,455,014 $2,044,163   $6,387,209   
CEO2014800,000868,8103,768,5501,632,5507,069,910
%Change3%22.5%(34.9)%25.2%(9.7)%
Mr. Marchisello, Jr.2015$417,665491,091N/AN/A$908,756
CFO(5)2014405,500422,1301,927,500697,4003,452,530
%Change3%16.3%N/AN/AN/A
Mr. McDonough2015$382,439449,672$1,303,939$922,988$3,059,038
COO2014371,300386,5281,927,500697,4003,382,728
%Change3%16.3%(32.4)%32.3%(9.6)%
Mr. Perry2015$360,500423,876$531,170$375,990$1,691,536
GC2014350,000364,354771,000380,4001,865,754
%Change3%16.3%(31.1)%(1.2)%(9.3)%
Ms. Morrison2015$267,063271,614$240,011$118,535$897,223
SVP - Leasing2014259,284271,050289,125124,423943,882
%Change3.0%0.2%(17.0)%(4.7)%(4.9)%

(1)These amounts are different from the amounts set forth in the “2015 Summary Compensation Table”, due to the reporting requirements under applicable SEC rules relating to the timing of the recognition of equity-based compensation.
(2)       For 2015, the OPP represents the grant date value of the maximum number of Common Shares that may be issued under the 2016 OPP at $15.10 per share. For 2014, the OPP represents the grant date value of the maximum number of Common Shares that may be issued under the 2015 Outperformance Plan (referred to as the “2015 OPP”), at $15.85 per share.
(3)For Mr. Tanger, the amount excludes the annualized value of the 45,000 fully vested Common Shares, 90,000 time-vesting Common Shares and the 90,000 performance-vesting Common Shares granted in connection with his February 2012 employment agreement.
(4)For direct comparison purposes, excludes dividends paid on unvested restricted Common Shares and “other” amounts.
(5)As previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2015, Mr. Marchisello plans to retire in May 2016. Accordingly, he did not receive any equity awards in 2016 for 2015 performance. Mr. James F. Williams, currently Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, is expected to succeed Mr. Marchisello as Chief Financial Officer effective May 20, 2016.

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   29




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The table below reflects the CEO’s realized compensation over the past 3 years. The realized compensation differs from the Summary Compensation Table because the realized compensation shows amounts actually earned for a given year, whereas the Summary Compensation Table reflects compensation that may or may not be earned in future years.

CEO REALIZED COMPENSATION ANALYSIS

      2013     2014     2015     
   Base Salary$800,000$800,000$824,000
Cash Bonus1,160,000868,8101,064,032
Total Cash Compensation$1,960,000$1,668,810$1,888,032
 
REALIZEDLong-Term Incentives:
 Time-Based Restricted Common Shares(1)$4,131,990$4,552,360$3,238,824
Performance-Based Restricted Common Shares(2)684,000
Dividends Paid on Unvested Restricted Common Shares422,568837,482448,569
Annualized Notional Unit Plan Value(3)3,032,8563,032,856
Total Realized Long-Term Incentives$7,587,414$9,106,698$3,687,393
 
 
Total Realized Compensation$9,547,414$10,775,508$5,575,425
 
One-Year Total Shareholder Return(4.01)%18.59%(8.15)%
 
3-Year Total Shareholder Return(4)35.64%36.36%4.55%
 
Percent Change in Realized Compensation from Prior YearN/A12.86%(48.26)%
 

(1)      Realized Time-Based Restricted Common Shares represent the shares granted for each year’s performance based on the grant date fair value. Includes the annualized grant date fair value of the Time-Based Restricted Common Shares granted in connection with Mr. Tanger’s February 2012 employment agreement ($783,810).
(2)Mr. Tanger was awarded 90,000 Performance-Based Restricted Common Shares in connection with his February 2012 employment agreement. For 2013 the second tranche of 18,000 Performance-Based Restricted Common Shares were not earned based on the Company’s TSR of -4.01% as of December 31, 2013. For 2014 the amount includes the 18,000 Performance-Based Restricted Common Shares that vested based on the Company exceeding the 8% annual TSR hurdle in 2014 at $38.00 per share). For 2015 the fourth tranche of 18,000 Performance-Based Restricted Common Shares were not earned based on the Company’s TSR of -8.15% as of December 31, 2015.
(3)Annualized Notional Unit Plan Value represents the annualized value of the 2010 Notional Unit Plan at the maximum payout smoothed-out over the 5-year vesting and performance period. 2014 was the last year the Annualized Notional Unit Plan Value was included.
(4)Represents 3-year TSR as of December 31 year-end.

Elements of Compensation

Historically, the Company’s primary components of compensation for its executive officers have beenare base salary, annual incentive cash bonuses, annual long-term equity-based incentive compensation and outperformance awards. There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between cash and non-cash incentive compensation or between short-term and long-term compensation, although the Company attempts to keep total cash compensation within the Company’s fiscal year budget while reinforcing its pay-for-performance philosophy and also taking into account annual accounting cost and the impact of share dilution. Within the frameworkofframework of aligning total compensation with corporate and individual performance, the purpose of each of the components is as follows:

Annual base salaries

Pay ElementObjectives
Base SalaryTo provide competitive fixed pay at a level consistent with the individual’s job responsibilities relative to his or her peers.

peers

Annual incentive cash bonusesIncentive
Cash Bonus
To incentivize management to achieve the Company’s strategic and financial goals for the fiscal year, generally using a formulaic calculation.

calculation

30   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy StatementLong-Term
Equity Incentive





Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Annual long-term equity incentives

To reward prior year performance and support the retention of senior management, while exposing recipients to the same market fluctuations as shareholders and thereby motivating management to create long-term shareholder value. The long-term equity incentives granted to executives are evaluated on an annual basis, and the terms of the awards are considered relevant to the length of the employment contract and/or performance period.

value

Outperformance awards
Plan
To enhance the pay-for-performance structure and shareholder alignment, while motivating and rewarding senior management for superior TSR performance based onin excess of rigorous, predetermined absolute and relative hurdles.

hurdles

30NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Base Salary: Description and AnalysisBASE SALARY: DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS

Although the Compensation and Human Capital Committee does not benchmark salaries to any specific percentile of base salaries paid to comparable officers in the targeted peer group, the NEOs are paid base pay amounts within the range of base salariesthose paid to comparable officers in the targeted peer group and sufficient to attract high-quality executive talent and maintain a stable management team. For 2015, the Company increased base salaries by 3% over 2014 amounts, which we believe is generally consistent with increases at similar performing REITs. The 2015 base salaries were as follows:

  Named Executive Officer     2015 Base
Salaries
  
Steven B. Tanger, CEO$824,000
Frank C. Marchisello, Jr., CFO417,665 
 Thomas E. McDonough, COO382,439
Chad D. Perry, GC360,500
Lisa J. Morrison, Senior Vice President - Leasing267,063

After a review of base salaries and total cash compensation as compared to our executive compensation peer group, it wasthe Compensation and Human Capital Committee concluded that it would be appropriate to keep base salaries for 2020 flat in 2016,with 2019. Base salaries for 2019 were increased 2%, except for Ms. Morrison, whoseMr. Tanger and Mr. Williams. Mr. Tanger’s 2019 base salary was not increased and Mr. Williams’ base salary was increased by 3%4% in connection with his promotion to CFO during 2016 and Executive Vice President in 2018 and to bring his salary more in line with similar roles in our peer group.

Base salaries approved for 2016.2020, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:

Named Executive Officer     2020 Base
Salaries
     2019 Base
Salaries
     2018 Base
Salaries
Steven B. Tanger, CEO$850,000$850,000$850,000
James F. Williams, CFO374,400374,400360,000
Thomas E. McDonough, Former President(1)401,880394,000
Chad D. Perry, GC378,420378,420371,000
Lisa J. Morrison, Executive Vice President - Leasing288,992288,992283,326
(1)Mr. McDonough retired on December 31, 2019.

Each of the NEOs has an employment agreement with the Company that includes a provision whereby the executive’s base salary shall not be less than certain previous amounts. See “Employment Contracts” on page 48.

Annual Cash Incentives: Description and AnalysisANNUAL CASH INCENTIVES: DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS

Incentive Cash Bonus Plan For Executive OfficersINCENTIVE CASH BONUS PLAN FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

During 2015,2019, all executive officers were eligible for an annual incentive cash bonus payment based upon achieving certain performance criteria during the year (referred to astheas the “Incentive Cash Bonus Plan”). The performance criteria were approved and set by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee in February 2015.2019. The annual incentive cash bonus for a fiscal year is typically paid in the first quarter of the following year once the results for the year have been finalized.

EachFor 2019, each executive’s annual incentive cash bonus amount iswas based upon Minimum, Threshold, Target and Maximum percentages of base salary. See the “2015 Grant“2019 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table on page 4443 for the dollar amounts payable under each of these categories. Generally, executives must be employed as of the last day of the year to receive payment under the annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan for that year.

The Minimum, Threshold, Target and Maximum amounts for 2015our NEOs in 2019 were unchanged from 2018, except for Mr. Williams and Ms. Morrison. Mr. Williams’ Threshold, Target and Maximum amounts were increased from 50%, 75% and 100%, respectively, to 75%, 100% and 150%, respectively, in connection with his promotion to CFO during 2016 and to EVP during 2018. Ms. Morrison’s maximum amount changed from 35% to 40%. The Threshold, Target and Maximum amounts for our NEOs in 2019 were as follows (as a percentage of base salary):

  Named Executive Officer     Minimum     Threshold     Target     Maximum  
Steven B. Tanger, CEO75%100%125%200%
 Frank C. Marchisello, Jr., CFO 75%100%125%170%
Thomas E. McDonough, COO75%100%125%170%
Chad D. Perry, GC75%100%

 

125%170%
Lisa J. Morrison, Senior Vice President - Leasing5%15%25%35%(1)

Named Executive Officer     Threshold     Target     Maximum
Steven B. Tanger, CEO       75%     100%     200%
James F. Williams, CFO75%100%150%
Thomas E. McDonough, Former President(1)75%100%170%
Chad D. Perry, GC75%100%170%
Lisa J. Morrison, Executive Vice President - Leasing(2)10%20%40%
(1)Pursuant to his Transition Agreement, Mr. McDonough became entitled to receive a guaranteed annual bonus of $400,000.
(2)Ms. Morrison also participates in a separate annual incentive cash bonus plansplan for leasing employees. See “Annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan for Leasing Employees” below. Per the terms of her employment contract, Ms. Morrison is eligible to receive an annual incentive cash bonus equal to the lesser of (1) 100% of her annual base salary or (2) 9.16% of the total commissions earned by our leasing employees with respect to that contract year computed as a percentage of average annual tenant rents (net of tenant allowances) in accordance with the Company’s leasing team bonus plan in effect for that contract year, except that if the amount determined under clause (2) is greater than 100% of Ms. Morrison’s annual base salary, such excess will be carried over to the next succeeding year. Ms. Morrison receives the higher of the bonus as calculated under the Company’s Incentive Cash Bonus Plan for executive officers or the bonus calculated under the terms of her employment contract, but not both.

www.tangeroutlets.com   WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

31




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The annual incentive cash bonuses payable to NEOs are based on the achievement of several company performance criteria that incentivize such officers to focus on the achievement of strategic and financial goals of the Company and, for 20152019, included the following measures:

Performance CriteriaCEO/
EVPs
Weighting
Other
Officers
 Weighting

Rationale for Including in Plan

FFO per share35.0%30.0%

Encourages focus on profitability as measured by the most frequently assessed REIT earnings measure.

Achievement of Strategic Objectives:

Seeks to reward management utilizing a balanced approach for executing the Company’s business plan by rewarding not just the executions of leases but also encouraging the renewal by existing tenants and the increase in rental rates with the goal of increasing shareholder value.

Lease renewal rate
5.0%4.4%
Minimum increase in base rental rates:
        upon lease renewals5.0%4.4%
        leased to new tenants5.0% 4.4% 
Minimum year-end occupancy rate
5.0%4.4%
Minimum increase in tenant sales
 5.0%4.4%
Financial Performance Targets:

Encourages focus on internal growth at existing portfolio and maintenance of leverage within acceptable levels.

Percentage increase in same center net
        operating income10.0%9.0%
Consolidated Debt to Adjusted Total
        Asset ratio10.0%9.0%
Individual performance objectives           20.0%                       30.0%           

Represents indicators of the executive’s success in fulfilling his or her responsibilities to the Company and in executing its strategic business plan.

Performance CriteriaCEO/CFO/President/
GC Weighting
Other Officer
Weighting
Rationale for Including in Plan

Financial Performance Targets:

AFFO per share (excluding the dilutive effect of asset sales or long-term refinancing)

Encourages focus on profitability as measured by the most frequently assessed REIT earnings measure.

Percentage increase in Same Center NOI

Encourages focus on internal growth at existing portfolio and maintenance of leverage within acceptable levels.

Consolidated Debt to Adjusted Total Asset Ratio

Strategic objectives (or Individual Performance for “Other Officer”)

Represents indicators of the executive’s success in fulfilling his or her responsibilities to the Company and in executing its strategic business plan.

For purposesAt the request of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee to assist with setting the2019 performance levels, for 2015, the CFO prepared for the Compensation Committee an analysis of including for the criteria above, the actual performance levels achieved for the last three years, andas well as the average of thethis three-year period asperiod. The average results were compared to the performance levels included in the operatingtheoperating and financial performance level budgets approved byapprovedby the Board for 2015.2019. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee generally sets thresholdperformance levels for each criteriacriterion at or above the current year budget levels. The budget reflects management’s assumptions regarding performance during the year taking into account many factors, both internal and external. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee may approve performance levels for the current year below the prior year performance levels when considering the current year’s budget or other factors outside management’s control. Certain target

The performance levels used in 2015for AFFO and Same Center NOI were either modified orboth set at amounts lower than those usedthe previous year’s performance levels to reflect (1) the successful completion in 20142018 of two separate mortgages in our unconsolidated joint ventures toreplace existing floating rate loans with ten and eleven year fixedrate mortgages with higher interest rates, (2) the expectation ofrising interest rates in 2019, and (3) the expectation of significantstore closings from bankruptcies and brand-wide restructurings, all of which are outside the Company’s control. During 2019, the Company did indeed recapture approximately 198,000 square feet in its consolidated portfolio from early lease terminations as follows:expected.Nevertheless, while the Compensation and Human Capital Committee gave consideration to these events, it set target performance levels for AFFO and Same Center NOI above the Company’s budgeted amounts for these metrics to ensure the bonus metrics would be rigorous. The Consolidated Debt to Adjusted Asset ratio performance levels were madeslightly more difficult from the previous year’s amount.

32

Minimum lease renewal rate in 2015 was based on all leases up for renewal, while in 2014, leases not renewing at our option were excluded (therefore, 2014 targets reflect a higher overall renewal rate);

Minimum increases on base rental rates were based on a cash basis in 2015 as opposed to on a straight-line basis for 2014;

Minimum year end occupancy rate used in each of 2015 and 2014 was set at the budget level for that year; and,

TSR was removed as a performance metric for purposes of the cash bonus plan during 2015.


32   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy StatementNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

At the time the individual performancestrategic objectives were set, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee believed the targets wouldperformance levelswould be challenging and difficult, but achievable with significant effort and skill. The corporate performance criteria and theperformanceandthe performance levels required under the incentive bonusIncentive Cash Bonus Plan for 20152019 approved by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, as compared to our level of achievement, arewere as follows:

2015 Performance LevelsActual
  Performance Criteria     Minimum     Threshold     Target     Maximum     Results
FFO per share$2.08$2.10$2.12$2.14$2.23  
Achievement of Strategic Objectives:
Lease renewal rate
78.0%82.5%83.0%84.0%83.7%
Minimum increase in base rental rates:
        upon lease renewals9.0%10.4%11.0%12.0%10.5%
        leased to new tenants15.0%17.3%18.0%19.0%13.8%
Minimum year-end occupancy rate
96.0%97.2%97.5%98.0%97.5%
 
Minimum increase in tenant sales
0.5%1.0%2.0%3.0%(0.1)%
Financial Performance Targets:
Percentage increase in same center net operating income
2.0%3.7%4.0%4.5%3.5%
Consolidated Debt to Adjusted Total Asset Ratio
50.0%48.9%48.0%47.0%49.3%
Individual performance objectives for the CEO and EVP’s3 of 6
objectives
4 of 6
objectives
5 of 6
objectives
6 of 6
objectives
4 of 6
objectives
Individual performance goals for other officers2 of 5
objectives
3 of 5
objectives
4 of 5
objectives
5 of 5
objectives
various

     2019 Performance Levels
Performance CriteriaThreshold     Target     Maximum     Actual Results     Achievement Levels
Financial Performance Targets:                                                
                     
AFFO per share (excluding the dilutive effect of asset sales or long-term refinancing)
 
Percentage increase in Same Center NOI
 
Consolidated Debt to Adjusted Total Asset ratio
                                  Maximum
 $2.34  $2.37  $2.40  $2.40 
                                      
                           
                               Between Target
and Maximum
 (2.6)%  (1.3)% 0.0% (0.7)% 
                                 
                              
         Between Target
and Maximum
 50.5%  49% 47.5% 48.4% 
         
                     
     
Strategic performance goals for the CEO, CFO, Former President and GC (described below)      Maximum
 

3 of 5
objectives

 4 of 5
objectives
 5 of 5
objectives
 5 of 5
objectives
      
                     
     
Individual performance goals for Ms. Morrison      Target
 3 of 5
objectives
 4 of 5
objectives
 5 of 5
objectives
 4 of 5
objectives
      
    

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee, in its discretion, may adjust the predetermined FFOAFFO targets to excludetoexclude significant charges which they believe are not indicative ofindicativeof the Company’s ongoing operating performance. No such adjustmentsThe four asset sales in 2019 were madeexcluded for the 2015 year.AFFO purposes as they were dilutive. See “Actual 20152019 Annual Incentive Cash Bonuses” below, for the amount of annual incentive cash bonuses received by each NEO pursuant to the above results. Further, for a reconciliation of AFFO and Same Center NOI to GAAP, pleasesee Appendix A.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes that thesethatthese strategic and financial goals are key drivers in ultimately increasingultimatelyincreasing the equity value of the Company and that these goals ultimately help align the interests of our NEOs and our shareholders. If minimum performance criteria targets are not met, no bonuses are paid. If maximum targets are met or exceeded,orexceeded, bonuses may be substantialsignificant but are capped as set forthsetforth in the table above.

In 2015,2019, the Company met the maximum financial performancelevel for its AFFO goal and surpassed some of the minimum performance levels and one oftarget, but did not achieve the maximum, performance levels.levels for the other twofinancial performance goals. The individualstrategic performance objectives forgoalsfor each of Mr.Messrs. Tanger, Mr. Marchisello, Mr.Williams, McDonough and Mr. Perry werePerrywere to (1) openacquire or repurpose one existing outlet center orcommunity center with at least 150,000 square feet in the USor Canada, (2) complete disposition of two newor more centers in the US or Canada, (2) finalize and close on the sale of two non-core assets and one joint venturein which we have an ownership interest,(3) begin construction on two new centers in the US or Canada, (4) enter into a contract to acquire one development site or one existing center, (5) increaseachieve overall comparable traffic by 2%of at least flat withprior year in centers in which we have an ownership interest, and (6) increase comparable foot traffic by 3%excluding the impact of significant weather events causingclosures of more than one day, (4) achieve year-end occupancy of at least 95% in centers in which we have an ownership interest. Theownershipinterest, and (5) obtain commitments from at least five magnettenants for a new center development. Although the Company met fourhas never ended the year less than 95% occupied, during 2019,the Company expected to recapture a significant amount ofsquare feet from early lease terminations as discussed above, and therefore expected the year-end occupancy to fall below the 95% hurdle. Accordingly, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee believed it was appropriate to maintain this metric as part of the six objectives during 2015. While2019 cash incentive plan. In addition, while Ms. Morrison participates in this plan, in 2015 her bonus compensation in 2019 was determined under the bonus plan for leasing employees as described below.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee determined itdeterminedit prudent to pay the bonuses earned by the executive officersofficers(other than Mr. McDonough) during 20152019 based on the achievement of the 2015 targets asperformance levels set at the beginning of 2019. Pursuant to the year.

Annual Incentive Cash Bonus PlanTransition Agreement, Mr. McDonough was entitled to a guaranteed bonus for Leasing Employees2019 equal to $400,000.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM33


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ANNUAL INCENTIVE CASH BONUS PLAN FOR LEASING EMPLOYEES

Ms. Morrison also participates in a separate incentive cash bonus plan designed to reward the Company’s leasing employees on an individual basis for successfully executing new leases and renewing existing leases with our tenants (referred to as “Leasing Commissions”), and on a team basis for reaching certain company goals with respect to achieving minimum overall occupancy rates, minimum renewal rate on leases expiring, and minimum average rental rate increases on existing leases renewed or new leases executed during the year, minimum conversion rate in converting lease requests to executed leases, and maximum number of days to get a lease fully executed once approved (referred to as “Leasing Team Bonus”). Management believes it is desirable for all leasing employees to participate in this plan in order to provide incentives for maximizing and growing the Company’s revenues.

Per the terms of her employment contract, Ms. Morrison is eligible to receive an annual incentive cash bonus with respect to Leasing Commissions equal to the lesser of (1) 100% of her annual base salary or (2) 9.16% of the total commissions earnedcommissionsearned by our leasing employees with respect to that contract year computed as a percentage of average annual tenant rents (net of tenant allowances) in accordance with the Company’s leasing bonus plan in effect for that contract year, except that if the amount determined under clause (2) is greater than 100% of Ms. Morrison’s annual base salary, such excess amount will be carried over to the next succeeding year. Ms. Morrison receives the higher of the bonus as calculated under the Company’s Incentive Cash Bonus Plan for executive officers or the bonus calculated under the terms of her employment contract, but not both. In 2015, 2019,Ms. Morrison received the bonus calculated under the terms of herofher employment contract, since such amount was higher than the bonus she would have received under our annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan.

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   33




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In addition, during 2015,2019, Ms. Morrison was eligible to receive a Leasing Team Bonus up to $20,000$25,000 if all of the minimum targetstarget levels were achieved, and then would receive an additional amounts in increments of $250 or $1,000 for each percentage point achieved abovebased upon the minimum performanceamount by which the target levels were exceeded, up to a maximum of $35,000.$40,000.

Actual 2015 Annual Incentive Cash BonusesACTUAL 2019 ANNUAL INCENTIVE CASH BONUSES

All annual incentive cash bonuses to named executive officersNEOs for 20152019 were paid in accordance with the terms described above, and the Company did not exercise any discretion to increase any such bonuses above the amount determined pursuant to the applicable formula.formula (or, in the case of Mr. McDonough, the amount required by the Transition Agreement). The actual cash incentives paid for 2015 performance2019 were:

Named Executive Officer     2015 Annual
Cash Incentives
     % Change
from 2014
Steven B. Tanger, CEO      $1,064,032            22.5%      
Frank C. Marchisello, Jr., CFO491,09116.3%
 Thomas E. McDonough, COO449,67216.3%
Chad D. Perry, GC423,87616.3%
Lisa J. Morrison, Senior Vice President - Leasing271,6140.2%

Named Executive Officer     2019 Annual
Cash Incentives
     Payout as a %
of Target
     % $ Change
from 2018
Steven B. Tanger, CEO$1,506,462         177%58.2%
James F. Williams, CFO (1)518,976139%132.5%
Thomas E. McDonough, Former President (2)%n/a 
Chad D. Perry, GC583,000154%57.1%
Lisa J. Morrison, Executive Vice President - Leasing (3)242,615n/a n/a 
(1)The increase for Mr. Williams related to his promotion to CFO in May 2016 and EVP in May 2018.
(2)Mr. McDonough’s bonus for 2019 was pursuant to the terms of his Transition Agreement.
(3)Ms. Morrison’s 2019 bonus was determined under the cash bonus plan for leasing employees. See “Annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan for Leasing Employees” above.

Long-Term Incentives: Description and AnalysisLONG-TERM INCENTIVES: DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS

The Company’s long-term incentive compensation consists of equity-based awards under its Incentive Award Plan, either in the form of restricted Common Shares options to acquire Common Shares at a predetermined priceor restricted share units or performance awards. Equity-based awards deliver increased value only when the value of our Common Shares increases. Long-term incentives are determined by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee based, in part, on peer group compensation practices combined with recommendations of management.management and its compensation consultant.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee generally administers our Incentive Award Plan, which provides for the issuance of equity-based awards to our officers and employees. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee authorizes theauthorizesthe awards to employees and establishes the terms and conditions of the awards under the Incentive Award Plan, as it deems appropriate.

As discussed earlier, inabove, following a review of our long-term incentive program and based on the feedback received from our shareholder outreach efforts, we heard shareholders express that:the Compensation and Human Capital Committee decided to increase the allocation of equity awards for all NEOs between performance-based and time-based awards to a 60/40 split for 2019, in order to be more heavily weighted towards performance-based awards, and used the same 60/40 allocation for awards granted in 2020. The charts below illustrate the average allocation between performance-based and time-based awards for awards granted in 2018, 2019 and 2020 for our NEOs.

34

The allocationNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2018 Allocation of equity awards should be more heavily weighted towards performance-based equity awards and less to time-based equity awards; and

Equity Awards
2019 Allocation of
Equity Awards
2020 Allocation of
Equity Awards

Performance-based equity awards should be more heavily weighted towards relative performance hurdles and less towards absolute performance hurdles.

Taking into consideration this feedback, we have redesignedSUMMARY OF LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS

The table below compares the equity compensation awarded to our long-termNEO’s in 2019 to 2018, reflecting the equity award program expressing a strong preference for “pay for performance.” In particular, we redesignedgranted during the programyear as part of the current year’s compensation, similar to do the following:way it is shown in the Summary Compensation Table per the SEC’s requirements on page 41.

Annual Long-Term Incentives(1)OPP GDFV(2)Total Equity Compensation
Named Executive Officer20192018%
Change
20192018%
Change
20192018%
Change
Steven B. Tanger, CEO $ 1,461,964 $ 2,487,127 (41.2)% $ 2,192,945 $ 2,111,479 3.9% $ 3,654,909 $ 4,598,606 (20.5)% 
James F. Williams(3),290,009375,196(22.7)%435,010278,71656.1%725,019653,91210.9%
CFO
Thomas E. McDonough(4),895,9711,285,179(30.3)%1,343,936954,71540.8%2,239,9072,239,894%
Former President
Chad D. Perry, GC405,265581,322(30.3)%607,897431,83640.8%1,013,1621,013,158%
Lisa J. Morrison(3),
Executive Vice President164,496240,002(31.5)%246,745121,225103.5%411,241361,22713.8%
- Leasing
(1)

ForRepresents the restricted Common Share and restricted share unit awards granted to our CEOeach NEO in 2018 and EVPs2019. The grant date fair value for restricted Common Share awards granted in 20162019 and 2018 is considered to be the closing price of the Company’s Common Shares on the day prior to the grant date, which was $21.73 and $21.94, respectively, except for 2015 performance, we reduced the numberMr. Tanger. The grant date fair value of time-basedMr. Tanger’s restricted Common Share and restricted share unit awards granted in 2019 and increased the number2018, which are subject to additional restrictions on sale after vesting and issuance of performance-based awards such that the allocation between the time-basedshares, as applicable, and performance-based components now reflects a 41/59 split in favor of performance-based equity.

was discounted per FASB ASC 718 by 12.5% and 15.0%, respectively.
(2)

We changed our 2016 OPP to reflect a 50/50 split between absoluteRepresents the notional units granted under the 2019 and relative TSR hurdles compared to2018 OPPs, multiplied by the 2015 OPP which included a 60/40 splitgrant date fair values of $12.09 and $12.42, respectively. The grant date fair values were based on probable performance outcomes computed in favor of absolute hurdles.

accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(3)

We reducedThe increase in total equity compensation for Mr. Williams and Ms. Morrison related to their promotions to EVP during 2018.

(4)Mr. McDonough retired December 31, 2019.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM35


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The table below compares the equity compensation granted to our NEOs in 2020 and 2019, reflecting the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s most recent actions, as equity grants are generally made during the first quarter of the year and based on the previous year’s performance. The equity compensation awarded in 2020 to our NEOs, except for Mr. McDonough who retired on December 31, 2019, was not increased and was kept at the same levels of equity compensation awarded in 2019.

Annual Long-Term Incentives(1)OPP GDFV(2)Total Equity Compensation
Named Executive Officer 2020 2019 %
Change
 2020 2019 %
Change
 2020 2019 %
Change
 
Steven B. Tanger, CEO$ 1,461,970$ 1,461,964%$ 2,192,949$ 2,192,945%$ 3,654,919$ 3,654,909%
James F. Williams,290,001290,009%435,007435,010%725,008725,019%
CFO
Chad D. Perry, GC405,268405,265%607,900607,897%1,013,1681,013,162%
Lisa J. Morrison
Executive Vice President164,491164,496%246,740246,745%411,231411,241%
- Leasing
(1)Represents the vesting period for time-based restricted Common Share and restricted share unit awards granted to the CEOeach NEO in 2020 and EVPs from 5 years to 4 years.2019. The time-basedgrant date fair value for restricted Common Share awards granted in 2020 and 2019 is considered to be the closing price of the Company’s Common Shares grantedon the day prior to the CEO will still have a three year holding period following vesting.

grant date, which was $14.73 and $21.73, respectively, except for Mr. Tanger. The grant date fair value of Mr. Tanger’s restricted Common Share and restricted share unit awards granted in 2020 and 2019, which are subject to additional restrictions on sale after vesting and issuance of shares, as applicable, and was discounted per FASB ASC 718 by 12.5%.
(2)

ForRepresents the 2016 OPP, we lowerednotional units granted under the minimum2020 and target TSR hurdles compared to2019 OPPs, multiplied by the 2015 OPP. We did not, however, reduce the maximum hurdles.

grant date fair values of $7.30 and $12.09, respectively. The grant date fair values were based on probable performance outcomes computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

The Compensation Committee believes 4-year vesting periods and lower minimum hurdles were reasonable in light of the fact that a greater portion of overall compensation is variable and may never be realized. The allocation and vesting periods for the awards granted to the SVPs and VPs remained generally the same as in the previous year.

Please read below for a more detailed description of the long-term equity awards granted in 2016 for 2015 performance and granted in 2015 for 2014 performance.

Restricted Common Share AwardsRESTRICTED COMMON SHARE AND RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AWARDS

Awarding restricted Common Shares helps to further align the interests of management with those of our shareholders. In setting the amounts and terms of the restricted Common Shares, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee considers the value of previous grants of restricted Common Shares and the total compensation expense recognized in the Company’s financial statements with respect to all previous grants of restricted Common Shares. However, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee does not necessarily limit the number of restricted Common Shares to be granted based on the total value or annual expense recognized in the financial statements because the Compensation and Human Capital Committee generally considers grants of restricted Common Shares to represent both an annual reward for individual and Company performance achieved as well as a longer-termlonger term incentive for future performance. Restricted Common Shares are generally granted during the first quarter of the current year once the results from the previous year are finalized.

34   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table Since 2018, a portion of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Based on the foregoing considerations, includingequity award to our CEO was granted in the TSR and operational performance highlighted on page 24,form of restricted share units, in February 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the following awardslieu of restricted Common Shares, for 2015 performance:

  Named Executive Officer     2015 Annual
Long-Term
Incentives
     % Change
from 2014
  
Steven B. Tanger, CEO      $2,455,014            (34.9)%      
Frank C. Marchisello, Jr., CFO(1)N/AN/A
 Thomas E. McDonough, COO1,303,939(32.4)%
Chad D. Perry, GC531,170(31.1)%
Lisa J. Morrison, Senior Vice President - Leasing240,011(17.0)%

(1)      As previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2015, Mr. Marchisello has announced his plans to retire in May 2016. Accordingly, he did not receive a grant of restricted Common Shares.

in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement. It is expected that our CEO will receive all of his annual time-based vesting equity awards in the form of restricted share units in the future.

The restricted Common Shares and restricted share units were granted to the named executive officers for 20152019 performance in February 2016. For the CEO2020 and EVPs, suchfor 2018 performance in February 2019. The awards granted in February 2020 vest and the restrictions cease to apply with respect to 25% of the Common Shares underlying each award on February 15 of each yearratably over a four-yearthree-year period, beginning on February 15, 2017. For Ms. Morrison, such awards vest and the restrictions cease2021. Such vesting, however, is subject to apply with respect to 20% of the Common Shares underlying each awardacceleration in certain termination scenarios, as described further in “Equity Compensation Plan Information -Potential Payments on February 15 of each year over a five-year period, beginning on February 15, 2017.Termination or Change in Control.” For the CEO, the restricted Common Shares and restricted share units granted for 2015 performancein 2020 and 2019 include additional holding periodholdingperiod restrictions under which the vested Common Shares and Common Shares issued in respect of the restricted share units cannot be sold for an additional three years following each vesting date.

In addition, in February 2015, theor issuance date, as applicable.

The Compensation Committee approved the following annual long-term incentives based on Company performance achieved for 2014:

  Named Executive Officer     2014 Annual
Long-Term
Incentives
     % Change
from 2013
  
Steven B. Tanger, CEO      $3,768,550             12.6%      
Frank C. Marchisello, Jr., CFO1,927,5009.6%
 Thomas E. McDonough, COO1,927,5009.6%
Chad D. Perry, GC771,00019.3%
Lisa J. Morrison, Senior Vice President - Leasing289,12514.0%

The restricted Common Shares were granted to the named executive officers for 2014 performance in February 2015. The awards vest and the restrictions cease to apply for 20% of the Common Shares underlying each award on February 15 of each year over a five-year period, beginning in 2016. For the CEO, the restricted Common Shares granted for 2014 performance include additional holding period restrictions under which the vested Common Shares cannot be sold for an additional three years following each vesting date.

Dividends are paid on all restricted Common Shares whether vested or unvested. The CompensationHuman Capital Committee believes that restricted Common Share and restricted share unit grants with time-based vesting features provide the desired incentive to increase the Company’s share price and, therefore, the value for our shareholders over the vesting period. If the Company has poor relative performance that results in poor shareholder returns, then the value of the restricted Common Shares and restricted share units, and likewise the executive’s total compensation, will be reduced. If the Company has superior relative performance that results in superior shareholder returns, then the value of the restricted Common Shares and restricted share units, and likewise the executive officer’s total compensation, will be significantly increased.

The Company measures the grant date fair value under FASB ASC 718 of all restricted Common Share and restricted share unit awards with time-based vesting features based on the provisions of the Incentive Award Plan. Under those provisions, fair value is considered to be the closing price of our Common Shares on the last trading day prior to the grant date, except for the restricted Common Shares and restricted share units granted to the CEO in 20162020 and 20152019 that are subject to additional restrictions on sale after vesting or issuance, as applicable, described above which were each discounted per FASB ASC 718 by 15%12.5%.

Common Share Option Awards

The Company has not used options for executive compensation since 2004. The Compensation Committee approved the issuance in January 2014 of an aggregate of 282,500 options to certain non-executive employees who had been employed with the Company for at least one year. No options were granted during 2015.

When awarded, options are granted with an exercise price no less than the fair market value of our Common Shares. Under the terms of the Incentive Award Plan, the fair market value of our Common Shares is considered to be the closing price on the last trading day prior to the grant date. The Company does not backdate options, grant options retroactively, or coordinate grants of options so that they are made before announcements of favorable information, or after announcements of unfavorable information. Further, the Company has not engaged in any option repricing.

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   35




Table of Contents2019 AND 2020 OUTPERFORMANCE PLANS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2015 Outperformance Plan

During February 2015,2019 and February 2020, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee approved the general terms of the Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 2015 OPP,2019 and 2020 OPPs, which providesprovide for the grant of performance awards under the Incentive Award Plan. UnderFor 2019, the 2015Compensation and Human Capital

36NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Committee did not make any structural changes to the 2019 OPP and chose to retain the same metrics and performance hurdles as the 2018 OPP. However, as discussed above, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee decided that the allocation for equity compensation tied to performance to be granted in 2019 should be increased to 60% of the totalvalue of each NEO’s total equity compensation, whereas the majority of each NEO’s equity compensation was tied to time-based performance in the previous year.For the 2020 OPP, the Company has granted an aggregate of 306,600 notional unitsCommittee maintained the same structure as the 2019 OPP, but decided to award recipients, which may convert, subject to the achievement of the goals described below, into a maximum of 306,600 restricted Common Shares based on the Company’s absolute Common Share price appreciation and its Common Share price appreciation relative to its peer group, over the three-year measurement period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. The maximum number of restricted Common Shares will be earned under the 2015 OPP if the Company both (1) achieves 35% or higher Common Share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid, over the three-year measurement period and (2) is in the 70th or greater percentile of its peer group for TSR over the three-year measurement period. The Company expects that the maximum value of the awards, if the Company achieves or exceeds the 35% Common Share price appreciation and is in the 70th or greater percentile of its peer group for TSR over the three-year measurement period, will equal approximately $14.5 million.

Listed below is the maximum number of restricted Common Shares thatincrease each of the Company’s named executive officers will be eligibleperformance hurdles needed to receive upon achieving both goals discussed above atearn the conclusionabsolute portion of the performance period:award.

  Named Executive OfficerMaximum
Award
     Maximum
Potential Value
(1)
     Grant Date
Value(2)
  
Steven B. Tanger, CEO   103,000             $4,870,870             $1,632,550    
Frank C. Marchisello, Jr., CFO44,0002,080,760697,400
Thomas E. McDonough, COO 44,0002,080,760697,400
 Chad D. Perry, GC24,0001,134,960380,400
Lisa J. Morrison, Senior Vice President - Leasing7,850371,227124,423

(1)      Represents the maximum number of restricted Common Shares to be issued multiplied by the estimated value per share resulting in maximum potential value of $47.29 per restricted Common Share.
(2)Represents the notional units granted under the plan multiplied by the grant date fair value of $15.85. The grant date fair value was based on probable performance outcomes computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
% of
Award
Earned
 67% Relative TSR vs.
FTSE NAREIT Retail Index
   33% Absolute TSR   % of
Award
Earned
 67% Relative TSR vs.
FTSE NAREIT Retail Index
   33% Absolute TSR
 
Performance TargetsPerformance TargetsPerformance TargetsPerformance Targets
20%Minimum: 30thPercentileMinimum: 19.1% TSR20%Minimum: 30thPercentileMinimum: 36.8% TSR
60%Target: 55thPercentileTarget: 24.3% TSR60%Target: 55thPercentileTarget: 44.3% TSR
100%Maximum: 80thPercentileMaximum: 29.5% TSR100%Maximum: 80thPercentileMaximum: 52.1% TSR

Any restricted Common Shares earned under the 2019 and 2020 OPPs (which conclude on December 31, 2017February 17, 2022 and February 10, 2023, respectively) are also subject to a time-based vesting schedule, pursuant to which 50% of the restricted Common Shares would vest on January 2, 2018at the conclusion of the three-year performance period and the remaining 50% would vest on January 2, 2019, contingent upon continued employment with the Company through the vesting dates.

With respect to 60% of the notional units (which are convertible into up to 183,960 restricted Common Shares potentially payable to the NEOs as a group) earned based on absolute TSR performance, the following hurdles must be achieved over the three-year measurement period:

  TSR Performance      % of Award
Earned
     Units Convertible
into Restricted
Common Shares
  
 25%, including Common Share price appreciation and all dividends33.333%61,320 
30%, including Common Share price appreciation and all dividends66.667%122,640
35%, including Common Share price appreciation and all dividends100.00%183,960

With respect to 40% of the notional units (which are convertible into up to 122,640 restricted Common Shares potentially payable to the NEOs as a group) earned based on relative TSR performance, the following hurdles must be achieved:

  TSR Performance      % of Award
Earned
     Units Convertible
into Restricted
Common Shares
  
 50th percentile of the peer group based on the SNL Equity REIT Index33.333%40,880 
60th percentile of the peer group based on the SNL Equity REIT Index66.667%81,760
70th percentile of the peer group based on the SNL Equity REIT Index100.00%122,640

The notional units will convert on a pro-rata basis by linear interpolation between Common Share price appreciation thresholds, both for absolute and relative Common Share price appreciation. The Common Share price targets will be reduced on a penny-for-penny basis with respect to any dividend payments made during the measurement period.

The notional units, prior to the date they are converted into restricted Common Shares, will not entitle award recipients to receive any dividends or other distributions. If the notional units are earned, and thereby converted into restricted Common Shares (whether vested or unvested), then award recipients will be entitled to receive a payment

36   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

of all dividends and other distributions that would have been paid had the number of earned restricted Common Shares been issued at the beginning of the performance period. Thereafter, dividends and other distributions will be paid currently with respect to all restricted Common Shares that were earned, whether vested or unvested.

2016 Outperformance Plan

During February 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the general terms of the Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 2016 OPP, which provides for the grant of performance awards under the Incentive Award Plan. The terms are similar to the 2015 OPP but contain modifications based in part on shareholder feedback:

The 2016 OPP is split 50/50 absolute to relative performance hurdles compared to 60/40 in the 2015 OPP.

Minimum and Target Performance level payouts have been decreased to 20% and 60% of the award, respectively, from 33.33% and 66.67%, respectively.

Minimum and Target absolute performance hurdles have been lowered to +18% and +26.5%, respectively, from +25% and +30%, respectively.

Minimum and Target relative performance hurdles have been lowered to the 40th percentile and 55th percentile of the peer group, respectively, from the 50th percentile and 60th percentile of the peer group, respectively.

We believe that these changes address shareholder feedback while maintaining targets that will be challenging and difficult, but achievable with significant effort and skill.

Under the 2016 OPP, the Company has granted an aggregate of 321,900 notional units to award recipients, which may convert, subject to the achievement of the goals described below, into a maximum of 321,900 restricted Common Shares based on the Company’s absolute Common Share price appreciation and its Common Share price appreciation relative to its peer group, over the three-year measurement period from February 10, 2016 through February 9, 2019. The maximum number of restricted Common Shares will be earned under the 2016 OPP if the Company both (1) achieves 35% or higher Common Share price appreciation, inclusive of all dividends paid, over the three-year measurement period and (2) is(and, in the 70th or greater percentilecase of its peer group for TSR overour CEO, would be issued) upon the three-year measurement period. The Company expects the valuecompletion of the awards, if the Company achieves the 35% Common Share price appreciation and is in the 70th percentileone additional year of its peer group for TSR over the three-year measurement period, will equal approximately $12.2 million.

Listed below is the maximum number of restricted Common Shares that each of the Company’s named executive officers will be eligible to receive upon achieving both goals discussed above at the conclusion of the performance period:

  Named Executive Officer       Maximum
Award
       Maximum
Potential Value
(1)
       Grant Date
Value(2)
  
Steven B. Tanger, CEO     135,375                     $5,136,128            2,044,163   
Frank C. Marchisello, Jr., CFO(3)N/AN/AN/A
Thomas E. McDonough, COO61,1252,319,083922,988
Chad D. Perry, GC24,900944,706375,990
Lisa J. Morrison, Senior Vice President - Leasing7,850297,829118,535

(1)Represents the maximum number of restricted Common Shares to be issued multiplied by the estimated value per share resulting in maximum potential value of $37.94 per restricted Common Share.
(2)Represents the notional units granted under the 2016 OPP multiplied by the grant date fair value of $15.10. The grant date fair value was based on probable performance outcomes computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(3)As previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2015, Frank Marchisello has announced his plans to retire as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and as Vice President and Treasurer of Tanger GP Trust in May 2016. Accordingly, he did not receive a grant of notional units under the 2016 OPP.

Any restricted Common Shares earned on February 9, 2019 are also subject to a time-based vesting schedule, pursuant to which 50% of the restricted Common Shares would vest on February 15, 2019 and the remaining 50% would vest on February 15, 2020,service, contingent upon continued employment with the Company through the applicable vesting date.

With respect Such vesting, however, is subject to 50% of the notional units (which are convertible into up to 160,950 restricted Common Shares potentially payable to the NEOsacceleration in certain termination scenarios, as a group) earned baseddescribed further in “Equity Compensation Plan Information - Potential Payments on absolute TSR performance, the following hurdles must be achieved over the three-year measurement period:

  TSR Performance       % of Award
Earned
       Units Convertible
into Restricted
Common Shares
  
18%, including Common Share price appreciation and all dividends20.0%32,190
26.5%, including Common Share price appreciation and all dividends60.0%96,570
35%, including Common Share price appreciation and all dividends100.0%160,950

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   37




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

With respect to 50% of the notional units (which are convertible into up to 160,950 restricted Common Shares potentially payable to the NEOs as a group) earned based on relative TSR performance, the following hurdles must be achieved:

  TSR Performance       % of Award
Earned
       Units Convertible
into Restricted
Common Shares
  
40th percentile of the peer group based on the SNL Equity REIT Index20.0%32,190
55th percentile of the peer group based on the SNL Equity REIT Index60.0%96,570
70th percentile of the peer group based on the SNL Equity REIT Index100.0%160,950

The notional units will convert on a pro-rata basis by linear interpolation between Common Share price appreciation thresholds, both for absolute and relative Common Share price appreciation. The Common Share price targets will be reduced on a penny-for-penny basis with respect to any dividend payments made during the measurement period.Termination or Change in Control.”

The notional units, prior to the date they are converted into restricted Common Shares, will not entitle award recipients to receive any dividends or other distributions. If the notional units are earned, and thereby converted into restricted Common Shares (whether vested or unvested), then award recipients will be entitled to receive a payment of all dividends and other distributions that would have been paid had the number of earned restricted Common Shares been issued at the beginning of the performance period. Thereafter, dividends and other distributions will be paid currently with respect to all restricted Common Shares that were earned,issued, whether vested or unvested.

Achievement of Performance-Based Long-Term Incentives

Approximately 25% of the total compensation of our CEO and on average 24% of the total compensation of other NEOs represents at-risk performance-based long-term incentives subject to the achievement of TSR performance. The following table summarizes the Company’s performance-based long-term incentives since 2012:

ProgramPerformance
Period
TSR Performance
Requirements
Status
2013 Outperformance Plan
(the “2013 OPP”)
2013-2015Absolute TSR between 25% and 35% over a 3-year period Relative TSR between the 50th and 70th percentileNo Common Shares have been, or will be, earned under this plan.
2014 Outperformance Plan2014-2016Absolute TSR between 25% and 35% over a 3-year period Relative TSR between the 50th and 70th percentileResults will be determined after December 31, 2016 but, based on results through December 31, 2015, participants would not earn any Common Shares under this plan.
2015 Outperformance Plan2015-2017Absolute TSR between 25% and 35% over a 3-year period Relative TSR between the 50th and 70th percentileResults will be determined after December 31, 2017 but, based on current results through December 31, 2015, participants would not earn any Common Shares under this plan.

Retirement BenefitsRETIREMENT BENEFITS

The Company generally does not provide any retirement benefits to its executive officers, other than matching a portion of employee contributions to our 401(k) plan. Employee contributions are matched by us at a rate of compensation to be determined annually at our discretion. This benefit is generally available to all employees of the Company. See “EmploymentContracts” for a discussion of amounts that may be payable pursuant to Mr. Tanger’s employment agreement in connection with retirement.

PerquisitesPERQUISITES

The Company does not provide significant perquisites or personal benefits to executive officers, except that Mr.it providedMr. Tanger was provided with a monthly car allowance of $800 in 2015.2019, whichis consistent with previous years. In addition, also consistent with previous years, the Company paidmaintained an insurance policy to provide a total of $44,436 for premiums on life insurance policies forbenefit to Mr. Tanger of $5 million. Premiums paid on the policy during 2015.2019 totaled $100,883, which increased from the $44,436 paid in 2018 primarily due to the timing of policy payments as we transitioned to a new insurance provider. Going forward, we expect that such life insurance premiums paid for this benefit will be approximately $67,344 per year.

In addition, the Company owns a corporate airplane which is used almost exclusively for business travel. We believe that the confidential working environment, security, andefficiencymitigation of health risks in the current climate and efficiency provided by private air travel allow our CEO and other executives to maximize productivity while traveling for business.

Our CEO’s business travel includes travel from his primary office location to the Company’s headquarters. While we consider this travel to serve an important business purpose, for purposes of transparency, we identify the incremental cost of this travel as a perquisite for SEC reporting purposes. We determine the incremental cost per flight based on the cost of fuel used, landing fees, trip-related hangar and parking costs, and crew-related costs. The incremental cost does not include fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM37


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

as purchase costs of the airplane, pilot salaries and non-trip-related hangar and parking costs. In 2015,2019, this incremental cost totaled approximately $30,941.$74,965. However, we do not consider the characterization of this amount as a perquisite to be a significant factor in our overall compensation plan design or effectiveness.

38   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The CEO may use the aircraft for personal use from time to time, so long as the CEO reimburses the Company for such use so that there is no incremental cost to the Company.

Employment Contracts and Change of ControlEMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND CHANGE OF CONTROL

The Company’s business is competitive, and the Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes that it is extremely desirable for the Company to maintain employment contracts with its senior executives. The employment contracts generally provide for severance pay if the executive terminates his or her employment for Good Reason or is terminated by the Company without Cause, as those terms are defined in each agreement. The severance arrangements provided in the contracts are designed to promote stability and continuity of senior management. Equity awards granted to Mr. Tanger pursuant to his 2012 employment agreement and awards under the OPPs, to the extent earned, provide for accelerated vesting in the event of a Change of Control.Control, as defined in Mr. Tanger’s employment agreement. However, unless there ishe experiences a termination of employment following a Change of Control (i.e., a “double trigger”), Mr. Tanger is not entitled to cash severance orseveranceor accelerated vesting of his unvested time-based restricted sharesgranted after 2012shares in the event of a Change of Control. For all named executive officers, except for Mr. Tanger and Mr. McDonough, the employment contracts consider a Change of Control, as defined in each agreement, as a reason for an executive to terminate his or her employment, and thus would entitle him or her to certain severance pay. Our Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes it is fair to provide severance protection and accelerated vesting of certain equity grants upon a Change of Control. Very often, senior executives lose their jobs in connection with a Change of Control. By agreeing up-frontupfront to provide severance benefits and accelerated vesting of certain equity grants in the event of a Change of Control, our Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes we can reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of senior executives to their assigned duties without distraction in the face of an actual or threatened Change of Control and ensure that management is motivated to negotiate the best acquisition consideration for our shareholders. In addition, we intend to include double trigger change of control benefits in employment agreements with any newly hired executives whereby such executives will be eligible for change of control benefits only upon certain qualifying terminations of employment in connection with or following a change in control.

The Company currently has employment contracts with each of the NEOs listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 4241 of this Proxy Statement.Statement (other than Mr. McDonough). See “Employment Contracts” on page 48 in this Proxy Statement.

4
Governance Policies Relating to CompensationGOVERNANCE POLICIES RELATING TO COMPENSATION

Minimum Ownership GuidelinesMINIMUM OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

The Company’s Board of Directors expects all non-employee directors, the CEO, the CFO, the COOPresident and the GC to own a meaningful equity interest in the Company to more closely align the interests of directors and executive officers with those of shareholders. Accordingly, the Board has established equity ownership guidelines for non-employee directors, the CEO, CFO, COOPresident and GC. Non-employee directors are required to hold 5,000 Common Shares.Shares with a value equal to five times the base annual board retainer of $60,000. Newly elected non-employee directors have threefive years following their election to the Board to meet the share ownership guidelines. The executives are required to hold Common Shares with a value equivalent to a multiple of their base salary as listed in the table below:

TitleMultiple
CEO10 x Base Salary
CFO3 x Base Salary
COO3 x Base Salary
GC3 x Base Salary

The executives have five years following their appointment to meet the share ownership guidelines. Vested and unvested restricted Common Shares count toward the equity ownership guidelines. All non-employee directors and the executives, except for Ms. Skerritt and Mr. HenryUbiñas, who waswere appointed to the Boardboard in January 2016,July 2018 and July 2019, respectively, met the share ownership guidelines as of December 31, 2015.2019.

Clawback PolicyCLAWBACK POLICY

The Board has established a clawback policy applicable to our executive officers. The policy allows for the recoupment of incentive awards in the event that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws as a result of intentional misconduct, fraud or gross negligence. Each executive officer may be required to reimburse the Company for any incentive awards made after January 1, 2013 on the basis of having met or exceeded specific performance levels, under these circumstances.

38NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Anti-Hedging PolicyANTI-HEDGING POLICY

The BoardCompany has established an anti-hedging policy applicable to our executive officers, directors and directors.employees. The policy prohibits any director or executive officer of the Company from trading in puts, calls, options or other derivative securities based on the Company’s securities. In addition, certain forms of hedging or monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts, allow a shareholder to lock in much of the value of his or her holdings, often in exchange for all or part of the potential upside appreciation in the share holdings.shareholdings. These transactions allow the shareholder to continue to own the covered securities, but without the full risks and rewards of ownership. When that occurs, the owner may no longer have the same objectives as the company’s other shareholders. Therefore, executive officers, directors and executive officersemployees may not engage in any such transactions with respect to the Common Shares owned.they own.

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   39




Table of ContentsANTI-PLEDGING POLICY

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Anti-Pledging Policy

In February 2015, the Board adoptedOur named executive officers and directors do not have any shares pledged as collateral. The Company has established an anti-pledging policy applicable to our executive officers, directors and employees. The Board believes that pledging securities of the Company as collateral for margin loans or other transactions raises potential risks to shareholder value, particularly if the pledge is significant. Under this policy, officers, directors and employees of the Company may not margin, or agree or offer to margin, the Company’s securities as collateral for a loan obligation. Similarly, officers, directors and employees of the Company may not pledge, or agree or offer to pledge, the Company’s securities (or a right to receive the Company’s securities) as collateral for a loan or other obligation. These prohibitions do not restrictapply to any broker-assisted cashless exercise of equity awards. In addition, in order to facilitate the transition to the policy, these prohibitions do not apply to a margin or pledge of securities to the extent such margin or pledgethat was in effect prior to February 10, 2015;adoption of the policy; provided, that no additional Company securities may be added to any such pre-existing pledge on or after February 10, 2015.adoption of the policy.

An exception to the prohibitions in this policy may be granted by the disinterested members of the Board in their sole discretion where a person covered by this policy wishes to pledge the Company’s securities as collateral for a loan (not including margin debt) and demonstrates to the satisfaction of the disinterested members of the Board the financial capacity to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities.

Mandatory Holding PeriodMANDATORY HOLDING PERIOD

Restricted Common Shares granted to the CEO in February 20152019 and February 20162020 include four and five yearthree-year vesting periods respectively, and also have a mandatory holding period under which the CEO cannot sell his vested Common Shares for an additional three years following each applicable vesting date.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation and Other Tax Considerations

DEDUCTIBILITY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER TAX CONSIDERATIONS

Subject to certain limited exemptions, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (referred to as the “Code”) denies an income tax deduction to any publicly held corporation for compensation paid to a “covered employee” (which is defined as the chief executive officer and each of the Company’s other three most highly compensated officers, excluding the chief financial officer) to the extent that such compensation in any taxable year of the employee exceeds $1 million. In addition to salaries, bonuses payable to the Company’s executives under their present employment contracts and compensation attributable to the exercise of options and other share-based awards that may be granted under the Incentive Award Plan constitute compensation subject to the Section 162(m) limitation. The Incentive Award Plan permits, but does not require, share-based awards to qualify as “performance-based compensation” that is exempt from application of the Section 162(m) limitation. It is the Company’s policy to take into account of the implications of Section 162(m) among all other factors reviewed in making compensation decisions. However, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, while considering tax deductibility as one of its factorsfactor in determining compensation, will not limit compensation to those levels or types of compensation that will be deductible if it determines that an award is consistent with its philosophy and is in the Company’s and the shareholders’ best interests. Accordingly, some portion of the compensation paid to a Company executive may not be tax deductible by the Company under Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee may, of course, consider alternative forms of compensation, consistent with its compensation goals, that preserve deductibility.the Code.

Section 280G, Section 4999 and Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”) impose certain taxes under specified circumstances. Section 280G and Section 4999 of the Code provide that any executives, directorscertain officers and other service providers who receive significant compensation or hold significant shareholder interests and certain other service providers could be subject to significant additional taxes if they receive certain payments or benefits in connection with a change of control of the Company, and that the Company could lose a deduction on the amounts subject to additional tax. The Company has no policy or commitment to provide any executive or director with any gross-up or other reimbursement for tax amounts that such executive or director might pay pursuant to these laws, and each named executive officer’s employment contract provides for a cutback of amounts payable in order to seek to avoid such additional taxes. Section 409A imposes additional significant taxes in the event that an executive, directoremployee or other service provider receives deferred compensation that does not meet the requirements of Section 409A. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee considers the effect of Section 409A when designing the Company’s executive plans and programs, and such plans and programs are intended to be designed to comply with or be exempt from Section 409A in order to seek to avoid potential adverse tax consequences that may result from noncompliance.

40   

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement39




Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE

We have reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K, and based on such review and discussions, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

THE COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE
 
Allan L. Schuman (Chair)
William G. Benton
Thomas J. Reddin (Chair)
Thomas E. RobinsonJeffrey B. Citrin
David B. Henry
Bridget M. Ryan-Berman
Allan L. Schuman

www.tangeroutlets.com   40

   41

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT



Table of Contents

20152019 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table shows information concerning the annual compensation for services provided by our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and three other most highly compensated executives for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2019, 2018, and 2013:2017.

  Name and
Principal position
    Year    Salary
($)
    Bonus
($)
    Share
Awards
($)(1)
    Non-equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(2)
    All
Other
Compensation
($)
    Total
($)
  
Steven B. Tanger
President and
Chief Executive Officer
2015$824,000$—$5,401,100           $1,064,032           $544,146(3)$7,833,278
2014800,0004,995,558868,810901,918(3)7,566,286
2013800,0005,028,0541,160,000486,804(3)7,474,858
Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
2015$417,665$—$2,624,900$491,091$187,720(4)$3,721,376
2014405,5002,464,736422,130350,867(4)3,643,233
2013405,5002,171,360514,985166,242(4)3,258,087
Thomas E. McDonough
Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
2015$382,439$—$2,624,900$449,672$159,598(5)$3,616,609
2014371,3002,464,736386,528119,612(5)3,342,176
2013371,3002,171,360471,55184,120(5)3,098,331
Chad D. Perry
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
2015$360,500$—$1,151,400$423,876$59,095(6)$1,994,871
2014350,0001,052,985364,35442,452(6)1,809,791
2013350,000935,029444,50026,840(6)1,756,369
Lisa J. Morrison
Senior Vice President,
Leasing
2015$267,063$—$413,548$271,614$34,765(7)$986,990
2014259,284379,423271,05071,881(7)981,638
2013254,200390,018271,20027,143(7)942,561

Name and
Principal position
  Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
    Share
Awards
($) (1)
  Non-equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($) (2)
  All
Other
Compensation
($) (4)
  Total
($)
Steven B. Tanger
Chief Executive Officer
2019$850,000$ $3,654,909   $1,506,462     $558,328 $6,569,699
2018850,0004,598,606952,000569,6916,970,297
2017850,0004,568,634993,367612,9477,024,948
James F. Williams
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
2019$374,400$$725,019$518,976$56,719$1,675,114
2018360,000653,912223,20052,7771,289,889
2017360,000518,320168,72046,4811,093,521
Thomas E. McDonough
Former President and
Chief Operating Officer
2019$401,880$400,000(3) $2,239,907$$796,897$3,838,684
2018394,0002,239,894394,000196,9853,224,879
2017394,0002,226,434413,175211,0473,244,656
Chad D. Perry
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel, and Secretary
2019$378,420$$1,013,162$583,000$84,068$2,058,650
2018371,0001,013,158371,00088,8081,843,966
2017371,000907,059389,05592,8331,759,947
Lisa J. Morrison
Executive Vice President,
Leasing
2019$288,992$$411,241$242,615$46,881$989,729
2018283,326361,227291,44145,492981,486
2017283,326359,535295,05744,717982,635
(1)The amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of restricted Common Shares awarded in each respective year, and the grant date fair value of notional units granted under the 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017 Outperformance Plans. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these values may be found in Note 17 to our 2015 consolidated financial statements on pages F-45 to F-49 of our 2015 Annual Report, Note 17 to our 20142019 audited consolidated financial statements on pages F-44F-43 to F-47 of our 20142019 Annual Report, and Note 1618 to our 20132018 audited consolidated financial statements on pages F-40F-46 to F-43F-50 of our 20132018 Annual Report and Note 18 to our 2017 audited consolidated financial statements on pages F-51 to F-55 of our 2017 Annual Report, respectively. With respect to the awards granted under the 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017 Outperformance Plans, the grant date fair values were based on probable performance outcomes. The grant date fair value for the 20152019 awards, assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will beare achieved, was $4.9estimated to be $4.3 million for Mr. Tanger, $2.1$845,000 for Mr. Williams, $2.6 million for Mr. Marchisello and Mr. McDonough, $1.1$1.2 million for Mr. Perry, and $371,000$479,000 for Ms. Morrison. The grant date fair value for the 20142018 awards, assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will beare achieved, was $4.8estimated to be $4.1 million for Mr. Tanger, $2.1$537,000 for Mr. Williams, $1.8 million for Mr. Marchisello and Mr. McDonough, $1.1 million$832,000 for Mr. Perry, and $370,000$234,000 for Ms. Morrison. The grant date fair value for the 20132017 awards, assuming that the highest level of performance conditions would beare achieved, was $4.7estimated to be $5.3 million for Mr. Tanger, $2.0$563,000 for Mr. Williams, $2.4 million for Mr. Marchisello and Mr. McDonough, $1.1 million$985,000 for Mr. Perry, and $359,000$307,000 for Ms. Morrison. Based on actual performance no restricted Common Shares were earned under the 2013 OPP.
(2)Amounts shown consist of payouts under our annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan earned during the fiscal year but paid in the first quarter of the following fiscal year; except that, with respect to Ms. Morrison, the amounts shown reflect (1) the bonus calculated under the terms of her employment contract, since such amount was higher than the bonus she would have received under our annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan and (2) a separate bonus she earned as a result of her leasing team reaching certain goals with respect to achieving minimum overall occupancy rates, minimum renewal raterates on leases expiring, and minimum average rental rate increases on existing leases renewed or new leases executed during the year.year, minimum conversion rate converting lease requests to executed leases, and maximum number of days to get a lease fully executed once approved.
(3)Amount reflects a guaranteed bonus equal to $400,000 that was paid to Mr. Tanger’s other compensation during 2015, 2014 and 2013 includes a car allowance of $9,600 each year and reimbursement of term life insurance premiums totaling $44,436 for each year, as perMcDonough pursuant to the terms of his employment contract. In addition, Mr. Tanger’s other compensation includes (a) dividends paid on unvested restricted Common Shares of $448,569 during 2015, $837,482 during 2014 and $422,568 during 2013, (b) a Company match under an employee 401(k) plan of $10,600 during 2015, $10,400 during 2014 and $10,200 during 2013, and (c) for 2015, $30,941 representing the incremental cost attributable to use of the Company’s aircraft.Transition Agreement.
(4)Mr. Marchisello’s other compensation represents dividends paid on unvested restricted Common Shares of $177,120 during 2015, $340,467 during 2014 and $156,042 during 2013, as well as a Company match under an employee 401(k) plan of $10,600 during 2015, $10,400 during 2014 and $10,200 during 2013.Amounts reported in 2019 include the following:
Name  Car
Allowance
  Employee Life
Insurance
Premiums
  Dividends Paid on
Unvested Restricted
Common Shares
  401(K)
Contribution
  Executive
Separation
  Use of
Aircraft
Steven B. Tanger    $9,600     $100,883            $361,680    $11,200 $74,965
James F. Williams45,51911,200
Thomas E. McDonough167,69911,200$617,998
Chad D. Perry72,86811,200
Lisa J. Morrison35,68111,200

42   

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement41




Table of Contents

2015 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE2019 CEO PAY RATIO

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information regarding the relationship of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of our median employee. We consider our pay ratio to be a reasonable estimate and calculated in a manner that is intended to be consistent with the requirements of Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. We identified the median employee by examining the 2019 total cash compensation for all individuals, excluding our CEO, who were employed by us on December 31, 2019, the reference date for identifying our median employee. We included all employees on December 31, 2019, whether employed on a full-time, part-time, or seasonal basis. We did not make any assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to total cash compensation, however we did annualize the compensation for certain full-time employees that were not employed by us for all of 2019. We believe the use of total cash compensation for all employees is a consistently applied compensation measurebecause we do not widely distribute annual equity awards to employees. After identifying the median employee based on total cash compensation, we calculated annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology we use for our named executive officers as set forth in the 2019 Summary Compensation Table earlier in this proxy statement.

As of December 31, 2019, we employed 347 part-time employees and 286 full-time employees, of which approximately 70% are hourly workers. Our median employee is a part-time customer service representative at one of our outlet centers that worked 168 days during 2019. Our CEO had annual total compensation of $6,569,699 and our median employee had annual total compensation of $12,954. Based on this information, for 2019 the estimated ratio of annual total compensation for our CEO to the median annual total compensation of all employees is 507 to 1.

(5)42Mr. McDonough’s other compensation represents dividends paid on unvested restricted Common Shares of $148,998 during 2015, $109,212 during 2014 and $73,920 during 2013, as well as a Company match under an employee 401(k) plan of $10,600 during 2015, $10,400 during 2014 and $10,200 during 2013.
(6)Mr. Perry’s other compensation represents dividends paid on unvested restricted Common Shares of $51,870 during 2015, $33,255 during 2014 and $17,040 during 2013, as well as a Company match under an employee 401(k) plan of $7,225 during 2015, $9,197 during 2014 and $9,800 during 2013.
(7)Ms. Morrison’s other compensation represent dividends paid on unvested restricted Common Shares of $24,165 during 2015, $61,790 during 2014 and $18,068 during 2013, as well as a Company match under an employee 401(k) plan of $10,600 during 2015, $10,091 during 2014 and $9,076 during 2013.

www.tangeroutlets.com   NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

   43




Table of Contents

2015 GRANT2019 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table summarizes grants of plan-based awards made to named executive officersNEOs in the year ended December 31, 2015:2019:

           Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(2)




Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(3)
All Other
Share
Awards:
Number
of
Common
Shares
or Units
(#)(4)
     Grant Date
Fair Value
of
Equity
Awards
($)(1)
NameGrant
Date(1)
Minimum
($)
     Threshold
($)
     Target
($)
     Maximum
($)
     Minimum
(#)
     Target
(#)
     Maximum
(#)
     
Steven B.2/10/2015115,000 $3,768,550 
Tanger2/10/201534,33368,667103,0001,632,550
 $618,000  $824,000 $1,030,000$1,648,000  
Frank C.2/10/201550,000$1,927,500
Marchisello, Jr.2/10/2015   14,66729,333 44,000  697,400
$313,249$417,665$522,081$710,031  
Thomas E.2/10/201550,000$1,927,500
McDonough2/10/2015    14,66729,33344,000697,400
 $286,829$382,439$478,049$650,146
Chad D.2/10/2015 20,000$771,000
Perry2/10/2015 8,00016,00024,000380,400
 $270,375$360,500$450,625$612,850
Lisa J.2/10/20157,500$289,125
Morrison(5)2/10/20152,6175,2337,850124,423
$13,353$40,059$66,766$93,472
267,063
20,00035,000

 
 
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (2)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards (3)
All Other
Share
Awards:
Number of
Common
Shares
or Units
(#) (4)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
($) (1)
Name Grant
Date
(1)
  Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Minimum
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
    
Steven B. Tanger2/18/201976,905$1,461,964
2/18/201936,277108,831181,3852,192,945
$637,500$850,000$1,700,000
James F. Williams2/18/201913,346$290,009
2/18/20197,19621,58935,981435,010
$280,800$374,400$561,600
Thomas E. McDonough2/18/201941,232$895,971
2/18/201922,23266,697111,1611,343,936
$301,410$401,880$683,196
Chad D. Perry2/18/201918,650$405,265
2/18/201910,05630,16950,281607,897
$283,815$378,420$643,314
Lisa J. Morrison (5)2/18/20197,570$164,496
2/18/20194,08212,24520,409246,745
$28,899$57,798$115,597
288,992
25,00040,000
(1)The grant date is considered to be the date the equity-based awards were approved by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee. Under the terms of our Incentive Award Plan, the grant date fair value for restricted Common Share awards is considered to be the closing price of the Company’s Common Shares on the day prior to the grant date, which for the February 10, 201518, 2019 awards, except for Mr. Tanger, was $38.55.$21.73. The grant date value of Mr. Tanger’s 20152019 award, which is subject to additional restrictions on sale after vesting, was discounted per FASB ASC 718 by 15.0%12.5%. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of notional units granted under the 2015 Outperformance Plan2019 OPP may be found in Note 17 to our 20152019 audited consolidated financial statements on pages F-46F-43 to F-47 of our 20152019 Annual Report. With respect to the awards granted under the 2015 Outperformance Plan,2019 OPP, the grant date fair value was based on probable performance outcomes.
(2)These columns show the range of estimated payouts targeted for 20152019 performance under our annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan for our executive officers (other than Ms. Morrison) as described in the section titled “Annual Cash Incentives-Description and Analysis” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The actual cash bonus payment made in 20162020 for 20152019 performance, based on the metrics described, amounted to 129.1%177% of base salary for Mr. Tanger, and 117.6% of base salary139% for Mr. Marchisello,Williams and 154% for Mr. Perry. Mr. McDonough and Mr. Perry.was paid a guaranteed bonus of $400,000 pursuant to the terms of his Transition Agreement.
(3)These columns show the amount of potential restricted Common Shares to be converted from notional units under the 20152019 OPP. The notional units convert based on the Company’s absolute share price appreciation (or total shareholder return) and its share price appreciation relative to its peer group, over a three year measurement period from January 1, 2015February 18, 2019 through December 31, 2017.February 17, 2022. A discussion of this plan and the share price appreciation goals can be found in the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 20152019 and 2020 Outperformance Plan”Plans” on page 36.
(4)Restricted Common Shares granted under our Incentive Award Plan are described in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-EndYear End 2019 Table below. Dividends are paid on unvested restricted Common Shares.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM43


Table of Contents

2019 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

(5)The amounts shown in this row under “Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” columns includes the amounts Ms. Morrison was eligible to receive under our annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan, the terms of her employment contract, and a separate bonus based on leasing team goals. Per the terms of her employment contract, Ms. Morrison is eligible to receive an annual incentive cash bonus equal to the lesser of (1) 100% of her salary or (2) 9.16% of the total commissions earned by our employees who are leasing employees who report to her. Ms. Morrison receives the higher of the bonus as calculated under our annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan or the bonus calculated under the terms of her employment contract, but not both. Ms. Morrison received a cash bonus of $265,614$231,115 in 20162020 for 20152019 performance based on the terms of her employment contract and did not receive a bonus under our annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan. In addition, Ms. Morrison received $6,000$11,500 as a separate bonus she earned as a result of her leasing team reaching certain goals with respect to achieving minimum overall occupancy rates, minimum renewal rates on leases expiring, and minimum average rental rate increases on existing leases renewed or new leases executed during the year.year, minimum conversion rates in converting lease requests to executed leases, and maximum number of days to get a lease fully executed once approved. Under this plan for 2015,2019, Ms. Morrison could receive up to $20,000$25,000 if the minimum targetsall target levels were achieved, and then would receive an additional amounts in increments of $250 or $1,000 for each percentage point achieved abovebased upon the minimumamount by which the target levels were exceeded, up to a maximum total award of $35,000.$40,000.

44

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy StatementNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT




Table of Contents

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT
YEAR END 20152019

The following table summarizes the number of securities underlying outstanding plan awards for the named executive officers in the year ended December 31, 2015:2019:

Option Awards Share Awards
NameNumber of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
Option
Exercise
Price
Option
Expiration
Date
Number
of Shares
or Units
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(1)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)(1)(2)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested (#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(2)
Steven B.          28,800(3)        $941,760           
Tanger57,600(4)1,883,520
 72,000(5)2,354,400
36,000(6) 1,177,200 
(7) 54,000    $1,765,800   
 96,000(8)3,139,200 
115,000(9)3,760,500  
    37,333(10)1,220,789
 34,333(11) 1,122,689
Frank C. 12,400(3)$405,480
Marchisello, Jr.  24,800(4)810,960
 31,200(5)1,020,240
41,600(8)1,360,320
50,000(9)1,635,000
16,000(10)$523,200
14,667(11)479,611
Thomas E.4,000(3)130,800
McDonough12,000(4)392,400
31,200(5)1,020,240
41,600(8)1,360,320
50,000(9)1,635,000
16,000(10)$523,200
14,667(11)479,611
Option AwardsShare Awards
NameNumber of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
Option
Exercise
Price
Option
Expiration
Date
Number
of Shares
or Units
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
(1)
Market Value
of Shares
or Units
That Have
Not Vested
($)
(1)(2)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(2)
Steven B. Tanger             23,000(3)   $338,790      
23,178(4)341,412
27,486(5)404,869
88,905(6)1,309,571
76,905(7)1,132,811
25,080(11)$369,428
34,014(12)501,020
36,277(13)534,360
James F. Williams1,500(3)$22,095
3,082(8)45,398
2,893(5)42,614
11,400(6)167,922
13,346(7)196,587
2,640(11)$38,887
4,490(12)66,135
7,196(13)106,000
Thomas E. McDonough
$
10,884(11)$160,327
9,598(12)141,379
6,430(13)94,717

www.tangeroutlets.com   WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

45




Table of Contents

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT YEAR END 20152019

Option AwardsShare AwardsOption Awards Share Awards
NameNumber of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
Option
Exercise
Price
Option
Expiration
Date
Number
of Shares
or Units
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(1)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)(1)(2)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested (#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
 Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(2)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of Shares
or Units
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
(1)
  Market Value
of Shares
or Units
That Have
Not Vested
($)
(1)(2)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(2)
  
Chad D. Perry          1,000(12)       $32,700         4,000(3)  $58,920
4,263(4)62,794
5,063(5)74,578
 12,000(4)392,400  17,664(6)260,191
 16,000(8)523,200  18,650(7)274,715
20,000(9)654,000 4,620(11)$68,053
   8,533(10)     $279,029     6,956(12)102,468
  8,000(11)$261,60010,056(13)148,128
Lisa J. Morrison1,200(3)$39,2401,500(3)$22,095
  3,000(4)98,1003,082(8)45,398
4,500(5)147,1504,177(9)61,527
6,000(8)196,2008,751(10)128,902
7,500(9)245,2507,570(7)111,506
2,850(10)$93,1951,440(11)$21,211
2,617(11)$85,5761,953(12)28,765
4,082(13)60,125
(1)Represents the portion of restricted Common Shares that vest based on rendering service over a specific period of time.
(2)Based on the closing price of our Common Shares on December 31, 20152019 of $32.70.$14.73.
(3)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates on 2/28/2012, 2/28/2013, 2/28/2014, 2/28/2015 and 2/28/2016.
(4)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates on 2/28/2013, 2/28/2014, 2/28/2015, 2/28/2016 and 2/28/2017.
(5)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates on 2/28/2014, 2/28/2015, 2/28/2016, 2/28/2017 and 2/28/2018.
(6)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates on 1/01/2013, 1/01/2014, 1/01/2015, 1/01/2016 and 1/01/2017.
(7)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, subject to satisfaction of performance criteria for the applicable year, with vesting dates, if earned, of 3/31/2013, 3/31/2014, 3/31/2015, 3/30/2016 and 3/31/2017. If Common Shares are not earned on an applicable vesting date based on performance through such date, such restricted Common Shares remain eligible to vest on 3/31/17 upon satisfaction of cumulative performance criteria.
(8)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates on 2/28/2015, 2/28/2016, 2/28/2017, 2/28/2018 and 2/28/2019.
(9)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates on 2/15/2016, 2/15/2017, 2/15/2018, 2/15/2019 and 2/15/2020.
(4)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 25% per year, with vesting dates on 2/15/2017, 2/15/2018, 2/15/2019 and 2/15/2020.
(5)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 33.33% per year, with vesting dates on 2/15/2018, 2/15/2019 and 2/15/2020.
(6)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 33.33% per year, with vesting dates on 2/15/2019, 2/15/2020 and 2/15/2021.
(7)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 33.33% per year, with vesting dates on 2/15/2020, 2/15/2021 and 2/15/2022.
(8)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates on 2/15/2017, 2/15/2018, 2/15/2019, 2/15/2020 and 2/15/2021.
(9)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates on 2/15/2018, 2/15/2019, 2/15/2020, 2/15/2021 and 2/15/2022.
(10)Restricted Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates on 2/15/2019, 2/15/2020, 2/15/2021, 2/15/2022 and 2/15/2023.
(11)Represents the portion of restricted Common Shares that may be earned from the conversion of notional units under the 20142017 OPP assuming for purposes of this discussion that the Company achieves its minimum levels of absolute and relative share price appreciation over the three year performance period ending December 31, 2016.February 13, 2020. Restricted Common Shares earned will vest 50% on January 2, 2017February 15, 2020 and 50% on January 2, 2018.February 15, 2021.
(11)(12)Represents the portion of restricted Common Shares that may be earned from the conversion of notional units under the 20152018 OPP assuming for purposes of this discussion that the Company achieves its minimum levels of absolute and relative share price appreciation over the three year performance period ending December 31, 2017.February 15, 2021. Restricted Common Shares earned will vest 50% on January 2, 2018February 17, 2021 and 50% on January 2, 2019.February 17, 2022.
(12)(13)Represents portion of restricted Common Shares that may be earned from the conversion of notional units under the 2019 OPP assuming for purposes of this discussion that the Company achieves its minimum levels of absolute and relative share price appreciation over the three year performance period ending February 17, 2022. Restricted Common Shares earned will vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates50% on 12/12/2012, 12/12/2013, 12/12/2014, 12/12/2015February 22, 2022 and 12/12/2016.50% on February 15, 2023.

46

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy StatementNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT




Table of Contents

OPTION EXERCISES AND COMMON
SHARES VESTED IN 20152019

The following table summarizes the option exercises and the vesting of restricted Common Share awards for each of our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2015:2019:

Option AwardsShare AwardsOption AwardsShare Awards
Name     Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise (#)
     Value Realized on
Exercise ($)
     Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting (#)
     Value Realized
on Vesting ($)(1)
     Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise (#)
     Value Realized on
Exercise ($)
     Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting (#)
     Value Realized
on Vesting ($)
(1)
  
Steven B. Tanger170,400       $6,065,520       142,118$3,097,932
Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.58,000 2,056,100
James F. Williams13,135286,328
Thomas E. McDonough   32,8001,156,820175,9953,033,037
Chad D. Perry9,000315,78026,158570,204
Lisa J. Morrison6,900244,6058,122177,045
(1)

Amounts reflect the closing market price on the day prior to the vesting date in accordance with the terms of our Incentive Award Plan.


www.tangeroutlets.com   WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

47




Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
INFORMATION

The following table provides information as of December 31, 20152019 with respect to compensation plans under which the Company’s equity securities are authorized for issuance:

Plan Category     (a)
Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(1)
     (b)
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
($)
     (c)
Number of
Securities Remaining
Available for Future
Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a)(2)
Equity compensation plans                                                                                            
approved by security holders 954,700$30.322,304,732
Equity compensation plans not       
approved by security holders  
Total954,700$30.322,304,732

Plan Category          (a)
Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
     (b)
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
($)
     (c)
Number of
Securities Remaining
Available for Future
Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a)
Equity compensation plans approved by
security holders1,647,204(1)$25.573,854,479(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders
Total1,647,204$25.573,854,479
(1)Includes (a) 318,400523,300 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options (104,700(284,500 of which are vested and exercisable), (b) 329,700290,022 restricted Common Shares that may be issued under the 20142017 OPP upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, and (c) 306,600381,065 restricted Common Shares that may be issued under the 20152018 OPP upon the satisfaction of certain conditions and (d) 452,817 restricted Common Shares that may be issued under the 2019 OPP upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. Because there is no exercise price associated with the 20142017, 2018 and 20152019 OPP awards, such restricted Common Shares are not included in the weighted average exercise price calculation.
(2)Represents Common Shares available for issuance under the Incentive Award Plan. Under the Incentive Award Plan, the Company may award restricted Common Shares, restricted share units, performance awards, dividend equivalents, deferred shares, deferred share units, share payments profit interests, and share appreciation rights.

Employment Contracts

EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS

The following summary sets forth the material terms of the employment contracts with the named executive officersNEOs in effect as of December 31, 2015.2019 (and for Mr. McDonough, his Transition Agreement).

STEVEN B. TANGER

On February 28, 2012,December 14, 2016, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Steven B. Tanger. PursuantTanger.Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Tanger shall continueshallcontinue to serve as President and CEO of the Company and, if elected or appointed, a member of the Board through January 1, 2017 (the period commencing on2021 (or, upon the Effective Dateexecution of a definitive agreement which could result in a Change of Control, the later of (1) January 1, 2021 and ending on(2) January 1 of the second year following the date of the Change of Control or the date the Change of Control transaction is terminated) (December 14, 2016 through such date, the “Contractthe“Contract Term”). During 2012,In 2019, Mr. Tanger was paid an annual base salarybasesalary of $800,000. For all subsequent years during the contract term, Mr. Tanger’s$850,000 (and such annual base salary is determined byremained unchanged for 2020). The Board of Directors will review the Board, but may not, without Mr. Tanger’s consent, be less than hisamount of annual base salary in the priorfor increase (but not decrease)each year. Mr. Tanger may also beis eligible to receive an annual incentiveincentivebonus, (with a target bonus includingopportunity of no less than 100% of annual base salary), annual awards under the Incentive Award Plan.

PursuantPlan on terms at least as favorable as annual awards granted to other senior executives, and a monthly automobile allowance of $800. Further, at least 40% of the employment agreement, the Company grantedvalue of annual equity awardsgranted to Mr. Tanger certain equity awards on February 28, 2012. Such equity awards consist of (1) forty-five thousand (45,000) fully-vested Common Shares, (2) ninety thousand (90,000) restricted Common Shares subject to timein 2019 (for 2018 performance) is subjectto pro-rata time-based vesting (“Time Vesting Shares”) and (3) ninety thousand (90,000) restricted Common Shares subject to performance vesting (“Performance Vesting Shares”).The Time Vesting Shares will vest, subject to Mr. Tanger’s continued employment, at the rate of twentypercent (20%) perover a three year with the first Common Shares vesting on January 1, 2013 and an additional twenty percent (20%) vesting on each anniversary of the Effective Date thereafter until the Time Vesting Shares are fully vested. The Performance Vesting Shares will become vested in equal installments on the 90th day following the end of each of the five calendar years during the Contract Term (each, a “Performance Year”) if (A) Mr. Tanger remains in continuous employment through the last day of the Performance Year and (B) the Company’s total shareholder return for such Performance Year is equal to or greater than eight percent (8%). Further, if any portion of the Performance Vesting Shares remains unvested as of the end of the fifth Performance Year, such Common Shares will vest if Mr. Tanger has remained in continuous employment to the last day of such fifth performance year and the Company has attained a cumulative total shareholder return for the five Performance Years equal to or greater than forty percent (40%).

All unvested Time Vesting Shares will also fully vest upon termination ofperiod, asrequired by Mr. Tanger’s employment due to death or Disability, his resignation for Good Reason, termination by the Company of his employment other than for Cause, or the occurrence of a Change of Control (as such terms are defined in the agreement). All unvested Performance Vesting Shares will also fully vest upon termination of Mr. Tanger’s employment due to death or Disability or the occurrence of a Change of Control.

48   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATIONagreement.

During the Contract Term and for ninety (90) days thereafter, the Company and the Operating Partnership will also provide Mr.provideMr. Tanger with term life insurance coverage under a policy orpolicyor policies in the face amount of $5 million in the aggregate and, in the event of termination of employment prior to the end of the Contract Term (other than due to death, for Cause or without Good Reason)Reason (other than for Retirement) as defined in his employment agreement), the Company and the Operating PartnershipOperatingPartnership will pay to Mr. Tanger (or the relevant insurer) an amountanamount equal to the premiums required to maintain such policy or policies through the end of the Contract Term. Upon any termination of Mr. Tanger’s employment, the Company and the Operating Partnership will, at Mr. Tanger’s option, transfer such life insurance to him at no cost.

If Mr. Tanger’s employment is terminated without Cause orCauseor for Good Reason,Mr. Tanger will, subject to execution andexecutionand non-revocation of a release in favor of the Company and its affiliates, (1) receive (1) a lump sum payment equal to three-hundred percent (300%) of the sum of (a) his annual base salary and (b) the greater of (i) his annual bonus earned for the year immediately preceding the year of termination and (ii) the average of his annual bonuses, if any, earned in the three years immediately preceding the year of termination, and (2) generally be eligible for continued participation in the employee benefit plans of the

48NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Company or the Operating Partnership through the later of (a) the 18 month anniversary of termination and (b) the end of theContract Term. If Mr. Tanger’s employment is terminated dueto death or Disability (as defined in his employment agreement),Mr. Tanger will receive (1) a lump sum payment equal to thegreater of (a) current base salary for the remainder of the Contract Term or (b) 100% of current base salary and (2) a pro-rated annual bonus for the year of termination based on actual performance (and achievement of all individual performance goals), prorated based on the number of days of employment in such year.

In addition, if Mr. Tanger’s employment is terminated withoutCause or for Good Reason or due to death or Disability, all unvested restricted Common Shares subject to time-basedvesting (“Time Based Awards”), including restricted CommonShares received upon settlement of Performance Based Awards, will fully vest and all unvested equity awards subjectto performance based vesting (“Performance Based Awards”)not yet settled in Common Shares will continue to vest pro-rata through the date of termination subject to the actual achievement of the applicable performance measures.

If Mr. Tanger’s employment is terminated due to non-renewalof the agreement on substantially similar terms at the end of the Contract Term, it will be deemed a termination withoutCause, provided that Mr. Tanger will, subject to execution andnon-revocation of a release in favor of the Company and its affiliates, (1) receive a lump sum payment equal to one-hundred percent (100%) (not three-hundred percent (300%)) of the sum of (a) his annual base salary and (b) the greater of (i) his annual bonus for the year immediately preceding the year of termination and (ii) the average of his annual bonuses, if any, earned in the three (3) years immediately preceding the year of termination, and (2) generally be eligible for continued participation in the employee benefit plans of the Company or the Operating Partnership through the end18-month anniversary of the Contract Term.termination.

If Mr. Tanger’s employment is terminated due to death or Disability,In addition, Mr. Tanger willmay voluntarily terminate employment byretiring any time after reaching age 72 and 20 years of service(such a termination, “Retirement”) and receive (1)a lump sum payment equal to the amount of annual base salary to which he would have been entitled through the end of the Contact Term and (2) an amount equal to his annual bonusprorated annualbonus for the year of termination based on actual performance (and achievement of all individual performance goals), prorated based on the number of days of employment in such year.

If Mr. Tanger’s employment is terminated due to non-renewalyear, and continued vesting of unvested equity. In the Contract Term,event of such aRetirement, Mr. Tanger shall continuewill be available to provide consulting services toconsult with the Companyboardfor 12 months following Retirement in exchange for one (1) year following the end of the Contract Term and shall continue to receive an amount equal toagreed monthly fee.

During his annual base salary during such one (1)-year period as compensation for his services. In addition, upon such a termination, all outstanding share incentive awards held by Mr. Tanger that are not performance-based shall fully vest and all accrued and unvested dividends on Performance Vesting Shares shall fully vest and be paid in lump sum.

While Mr. Tanger is employedemployment and for a period of twenty-four (24)twenty-four(24) months thereafter (the “Restricted Period”), Mr. Tanger isTangeris generally prohibited from engaging in the management, development or construction of any factory outlet centers or competing retail commercial property or in any active or passive investment in property connected with ana factory outlet center or a competing retail commercial property, withproperty. During the exception of ownership of up to 1% of any class of securities of any publicly traded company. Such prohibition, however, shall only apply afterperiod following termination of employment, this prohibition applies only with respect to properties that are within a fifty (50) mile radius of (1) any commercial property owned, leased or operated by the Company and/or related entitiesrelatedentities on the date of termination of Mr. Tanger’s employment oremploymentor (2) any commercial property which the Company and/or any related entity actively negotiated to acquire, lease or operate within the six (6)-month period prior to the dateof terminationdate oftermination of Mr. Tanger’s employment. During the Restricted Period, Mr. Tanger will also be subject to certain restrictions onrestrictionson solicitation of employees and other service providers of the Company and/or related entities and solicitation of customers, suppliers and other business partners and business affiliates of the Company and/or related entities.relatedentities. During the Restricted Period, Mr. Tanger may, however,own an interest in or provide services to an entity affiliated with another entity that is engaged in competition with the company so long as the entity he owns the interest in or provides services to does not itself engage in competition with the Company.

Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.JAMES F. WILLIAMS

James F. Williams has a three-yearthree year employment contract originally effective January 1, 2004 andOctober 24, 2006, amended and restated most recently effective December 29, 2008 and initially expiringon December 31, 2010. Mr. Williams’ contract has not been amended since December 29, 2008. Mr. Marchisello’s contract automatically extends for one additional year on January 1 of each year unless his employment is terminated, or we give written notice to him within 180 days prior to such January 1 that the contract term will not be automatically extended. The base salary provided for in Mr. Marchisello’s contract is subject to negotiation and agreement between the Operating Partnership and Mr. Marchisello each year, except that the amount may not be less than Mr. Marchisello’s base salary for the prior contract year. Mr. Marchisello is eligible to receive an annual incentive bonus based on performance criteria approved by the Company’s Compensation Committee.

If Mr. Marchisello’s employment is terminated by reason of death or Disability, he or his estate will receive as additional compensation a lump sum payment in an amount equal to his annual base salary and a pro rata portion of the annual bonus earned for the contract year in which the termination occurs. Further, if Mr. Marchisello’s employment is terminated by us without Cause, or by Mr. Marchisello for Good Reason, as those terms are defined in the agreement, Mr. Marchisello will receive a severance payment in an amount equal to 300% of the sum of (a) his annual base salary for the current contract year and (b) the higher of (i) the prior year’s annual bonus or (ii) the average annual bonus for the preceding three years, to be paid monthly over the succeeding 36 months subject to the limitations required to comply with Section 409A. Certain share based awards under our Incentive Award Plan are included in the calculation of the prior year’s annual bonus and average annual bonus.

Thomas E. McDonough entered into an employment agreement effective August 23, 2010 and expiring on December 31, 2013. Mr. McDonough’s contract will be automaticallyWilliams’ contractautomatically extended for one additional yearone-year periods at the end of the initial term and for each yearanniversary thereafter and will continue in such fashion, unless either party gives written notice to the other party within 180 days prior to the end of the initial term orthen-current extended term that the contract term will not be automaticallyfurther extended. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement,Mr. McDonough’sWilliams’ annual base salary may not be less than $350,000.$220,300. Mr. McDonoughWilliams is eligible to receive an annual incentive bonusbased on performance criteria approved by the Company’s Compensation and Human Capital Committee.

If Mr. Williams’ employment is terminated by reason of deathor Disability (as defined in his employment agreement), he or his estate will receive as additional compensation alump-sum payment in an amount equal to half of his annual base salary and a pro-rata portion of the annual bonus earned for the contract year in which the termination occurs. Further,if Mr. Williams’ employment is terminated by us without Cause,or by him for Good Reason or within 75 days following the first Change of Control during the contract term (as such terms aredefined in the employment contract), Mr. Williams will receive aseverance payment in an amount equal to the sum of (a) 100% of his annual base salary for the current contract year, and (b) his average annual bonus for the three consecutive contract years immediately preceding the contract year in which the termination occurs, to be paid monthly over the succeeding 12 months subject to the limitations required to comply withSection 409A. However, in the event of Mr. Williams’ terminationfor any reason on or after the 75th day following a Change ofControl, Mr. Williams will not be entitled to receive any severancepayments or benefits that would otherwise have been payable in connection with such termination.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM49


Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

THOMAS E. MCDONOUGH

Thomas E. McDonough entered into an employmentagreement effective August 23, 2010 and initially expiring onDecember 31, 2013 (the “McDonough Employment Agreement”). Mr. McDonough’s contract automatically extended for additionalone-year periods at the end of the initial term and each anniversary thereafter. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement,Mr. McDonough’s annual base salary was required to be not be less than $350,000. Mr. McDonough was eligible to receivean annual incentive bonus based on performance criteria approved by the Company’s Compensation and Human Capital Committee.

On June 4, 2019, Thomas E. McDonough notified the Companyof his retirement as President and Chief Operating Officer(“COO”) of the Company and as an employee of the Company’soperating partnership, Tanger Properties Limited Partnership(the “Partnership”), which became effective as of December 31, 2019 (the “Retirement Date”).

In recognition of Mr. McDonough’s agreement to continueproviding services from the date he notified the Company of his retirement through December 31, 2019 and his agreement to be bound to certain additional restrictive covenants following the Retirement Date (as described below), the Partnership entered into a transition agreement and release of claims withMr. McDonough, dated as of June 4, 2019 (collectively, the “Transition Agreement”). The Company believed it was vital to our business for Mr. McDonough to efficiently transition hisduties and responsibilities prior to his retirement and, pursuantto the Transition Agreement, Mr. McDonough agreed to forgoother business opportunities and remain employed with the Company and assist with the transition of his position throughthe Retirement Date. The terms of the McDonough EmploymentAgreement continued to control until the Retirement Date, subject to the terms of the Transition Agreement.

Pursuant to the Transition Agreement, Mr. McDonough iseligible to receive, subject to his execution of a release of claims: (i) continued base salary payments for 12 months following the Retirement Date, which equals an aggregate amount of$401,880, provided that if Mr. McDonough does not have afull-time paid position on December 31, 2020, he will continue to receive such payments at the same annualized rate until the earlier of (x) June 30, 2021 (which would equal an additional amount of up to $200,940) or (y) the date he accepts alternative full-time employment (ii) subject to his timely election pursuant to COBRA, payment of the employer portion of the premiums for continued health coverage through June 30, 2021, calculatedas if Mr. McDonough had remained an active executive duringsuch period, (iii) a cash bonus for fiscal 2019 of $400,000 to be payable at the same time in 2020 as annual bonuses are paid to other executives; (iv) accelerated vesting of his outstanding time-vested restricted share awards, and (v) continued eligibility of his performance awards to vest on a pro-rata basis through the Retirement Date, subject to the actual achievement of the applicable performance measures (collectively, the“Retirement Benefits”). The structure of Mr. McDonough’saward is not intended to reward failure and, in particular, thevesting of Mr. McDonough’s performance awards will notoccur to the extent the Company fails to achieve its applicable performance measures.

CHAD D. PERRY

Chad D. Perry entered into an employment agreement effective December 12, 2011 and initially expiring on December 31, 2014.31,2014. Mr. Perry’s contract will be automatically extended for one additional yearadditionalone-year periods at the end of the initial term and foron each yearanniversary thereafter and will continue in such fashion, unless either party gives written notice to the other party within 180 days prior to the end of the initial term orthen-current extended term that the contract term will not be automaticallyfurther extended. Pursuant to the termstheterms of the

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   49




Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

agreement, Mr. Perry’s annual base salary may not be less than $350,000. Mr. Perry is eligible to receive an annual incentiveannualincentive bonus based on performance criteria approved by the Company’s Compensation and Human Capital Committee.

If Mr. McDonough’s or Mr. Perry’s employment is terminated by reason of death or Disability,orDisability (as defined in his employment agreement), he or his estate will receive as additional compensation a lump sum paymentsumpayment in an amount equal to his annual base salary and a pro ratapro-rata portion of the annual bonus earned for the contract year in which the termination occurs. Further, if either executive’shis employment is terminated by us without Cause, or by either executive for Good Reason, as those terms are defined in his agreement, the executivehe will receive a severance payment in an amount equal to 300% of the sum of (a) his annual base salary for the then-current contract year and (b) the average annual bonus for the preceding three years to be paid monthly or bi-weekly over the succeeding 36 months subject to the limitations required to comply with Section 409A. Certain share based awards under our Incentive Award Plan are included in the calculation of the prior year’s annual bonus and average annual bonus.

LISA J. MORRISON

Lisa J. Morrison has a three year employment contract originally effectiveoriginallyeffective January 1, 2001 and amended and restated most recentlymostrecently effective December 29, 2008. Ms. Morrison’s contract has not been amended since December 29, 2008. Ms.Morrison’s contract Morrison’scontract automatically extendsextended for one additional yearone-year periods at the end of the initial term and for each yearanniversary thereafter and will continue in such fashion, unless her employment is terminated, or either we or Ms. Morrison giveparty gives written notice to the other party within 180 days prior to the end of the initial term orofthe then-current extended term that the contract term will not be automaticallyfurther extended. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement,Ms.Morrison’s base salary may not be less than $231,500. In additionInaddition to her base salary, if approved by the Company’s Board ofBoardof Directors, for each contract year, Ms. Morrison will be paid an annualanannual bonus in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) her base salarybasesalary in effect on the last day of such contract year and (ii) an amountanamount equal to nine and sixteen one-hundredths percent

50NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

(9.16%) of the total commissions earned by our employees who are leasing representatives with respect to that contract year computed as a percentage of average annual tenant rents (net of tenant allowances) in accordance with the Company’s leasing team bonus plan in effect for that contract year. If the amount determined under clause (ii) is greater than 100% of Ms.ofMs. Morrison’s annual base salary, such excess amount will be carried over to the next succeeding contract year, subject to Ms. Morrison’s continued employment though December 31 of such succeeding contract year. Ms. Morrison will receive the higherthehigher of the bonus determined under her employment contract and the bonus determined pursuant to the Company’s annual bonus plan.Incentive Cash Bonus Plan.

If Ms. Morrison’s employment is terminated by reason of death ordeathor Disability (as defined in her employment contract), she or her estate will receive as additional compensation a lump-sum payment in an amount equal to half of her annual base salarybasesalary and a pro ratapro-rata portion of the annual bonus earned for the contract year in which the termination occurs. Further, if Ms.ifMs. Morrison’s employment is terminated by us without Cause,or byherby her for Good Reason or within 75 days following the first Change of Control during the contract term (as such terms are definedaredefined in the employment contract), Ms. Morrison will receive a severanceaseverance payment in an amount equal to the sum of (a) 100% of her annual base salary for the current contract year, and (b) her average annual bonus for the three consecutive contract years immediately preceding the contract year in which the termination occurs, to be paid monthly over the succeeding 12 months subject to the limitations required to comply withcomplywith Section 409A. However, in the event of Ms. Morrison’stermination for any reason on or after the 75th 75thday following aChange of Control, Ms. Morrison will not be entitled to receive anyreceiveany severance payments or benefits that would otherwise have been payable in connection with such termination.

During the term of Mr. Marchisello’s employment and for a period of one year thereafter (three years if he receives the 300% severance payment described above), Mr. Marchisello is prohibited from engaging directly or indirectly in the management, development or construction of any factory outlet centers or competing retail commercial property or any other active or passive investment in property connected with an outlet center or a competing retail commercial property within a 50 mile radius of the site of any commercial property owned, leased or operated by us as of the date of Mr.Marchisello’s employment termination or within a 50 mile radius of any commercial property that we negotiated to acquire, lease or operate within the six month period prior to Mr.Marchisello’s employment termination. However, Mr. Marchisello may own up to 1% of any class of any publicly traded company and may serve on the board of directors of any publicly traded company, whether or not such company competes with the Company or the Operating Partnership.

NON-COMPETE AND OTHER PROVISIONS

During the terms of employment for Mr. McDonough,Williams, Mr. Perry and Ms. Morrison, and for a period of one year thereafter (180 days for Mr. Williams and Ms. Morrison) if the executive’s employment isemploymentis terminated by us for Cause or by the executive without Good ReasonGoodReason (or three years for Mr.McDonough and Mr. Perry, one year for Mr. Williams and Ms. Morrison, if the executive receives severance due todueto a termination by the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason), the executive is prohibited from (a) engaging in any activities involving developing or operating an outlet shopping facility within a radius of 50 miles of any retail shopping facility owned (with an effective ownership interest of 50% or more), directly or indirectly, or operated by the Operating Partnership within the 365-day period ending on the datethedate of termination of the executive’s employment, (b) engaging inengagingin any activities involving developing or operating an outlet shoppingoutletshopping facility within a radius of50of 50 miles of any site that,within the 365-day period ending on the date of termination of the executive’s employment, the Operating Partnership or its affiliate negotiated to acquire and/or lease for the development or operation of a retail shopping facility or (c) engaging in any activities involving developing or operating any other type of retailofretail shopping facility (or, in the case of Ms.Morrison, any full pricefullprice retail shopping facility) within a radius of 5 miles of and that competes directly for tenants with any retail shopping facilityshoppingfacility (or, in the case of Ms. Morrison, any full price retail shoppingretailshopping facility) that, within the 365-day period ending on

50   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

theonthe date of the termination of the executive’s employment,was (i)under development by the Operating Partnership or its affiliate;itsaffiliate; (ii) owned (with an effective ownership interest of 50% or more), directly or indirectly, by the Operating Partnership; or (iii) operated by the Operating Partnership.

The Transition Agreement with Mr. McDonough providesthat in addition to the existing confidentiality and 12-month post-termination non-competition covenants set forth in theMcDonough Employment Agreement, Mr. McDonough willalso be subject to 12-month post termination non-solicitation of customers and employees covenants and a perpetual non-disparagement covenant.

Mr. Tanger and Mr. MarchiselloWilliams are employed and compensated bycompensatedby both the Operating Partnership and the Company. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes that the allocation of such persons’ compensation between the Company and the Operating Partnership reflects the services provided by such persons with respect to each entity. All other employees are employed solely by the Operating Partnership.Partnership or one of the Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries.

All payments and benefits due to Mr. Tanger, Mr. Marchisello, Mr. McDonough,Williams, Mr. Perry and Ms. Morrison under their respective agreements areagreementsare subject to reduction to the extent necessary to avoid Federal excisefederalexcise tax on certain “excess parachute payments” under SectionunderSection 4999 of the Code.

Potential Payments on Termination or Change of ControlWWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM51


Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS ON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

The table below reflects the amount of compensation payable to each of our named executive officers in the event of a termination of such executive’s employment. In particular, the table below sets forth the amount of compensation payable to each named executive officer in connection with each of the following different types of termination of employment: (1) termination by the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason, (2) termination by the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason following afollowinga Change of Control (or in the case of Mr. Williams and Ms. Morrison, resignation within 75 days following a Change of Control), (3) termination as a result of death, (4) termination as a result of Disability, and (5) termination by the Company for Cause or by the executive without Good Reason.

Mr. McDonough, our former President, is excluded from thetables below as his retirement was effective December 31, 2019 and he is eligible to receive the Retirement Benefits provided for under his Transition Agreement, as discussed above. For additional information on the Transition Agreement and thebenefits payable to Mr. McDonough thereunder, see the section titled “Employment Contracts - Thomas E. McDonough” onpage 50of this Proxy Statement. The terms “Cause”,“Cause,” “Change of Control”,Control,” “Good Reason” and “Disability” as defined in the employment contracts of Mr. Tanger, Mr. Marchisello, Mr. McDonough,Williams, Mr. Perry and Ms. Morrison are generally as stated below:

CauseCAUSE

Generally under each employment agreement, the Company or the Operating Partnership, as applicable, will have “Cause” to terminatetoterminate the executive’s employment upon each of the following events or circumstances:

Name(s)     Applicable Definition of Cause
Mr. Tanger
  Mr. Marchisello
  Mr. McDonough
Mr. Perry
Causing material harm to the Operating Partnership or the Company, as applicable, through a material act of dishonesty in the performance of his duties;
Conviction of a felony involving moral turpitude, fraud or embezzlement; or
Willful failure to perform his material duties (other than a failure due to disability)Disability) after written notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure.
Mr. Williams
Ms. Morrison
Determination by the Operating Partnership that he or she has embezzled money or property;
Willful refusal to perform reasonable duties incident to his or her employment after ten (10) days’ written notice; or
Commission of a felony which, in the judgment of the Board of Directors of the Operating Partnership, adversely affects the business or reputation of the Operating Partnership.

www.tangeroutlets.com   52

   51

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT



Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Change of Control

CHANGE OF CONTROL

Generally, under each employment agreement, a “Change of Control” will be deemed to have occurred upon each of the following eventsfollowingevents or circumstances:

Name(s)     Applicable Definition of Change of Control
Mr. Tanger
  Mr. Marchisello
  Mr. McDonough
Mr. Perry
Sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (other than pursuant to internal reorganization) by the Company or the Operating Partnership of more than 50% of its assets to a single purchaser or group of associated purchasers;
Merger, consolidation or similar transaction in which the Company or the Operating Partnership does not survive as an independent, publicly owned corporation or the Company (or, with respect to Mr. Marchisello, Mr. McDonough and Mr. Perry, an entity wholly owned by the Company) ceases to be the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership;
Acquisition of securities of the Company or the Operating Partnership in one or a related series of transactions (other than pursuant to an internal reorganization) by a single purchaser or group of associated purchasers (other than the executive or any of his lineal descendants, lineal ancestors or siblings) which results in their ownership of 25% or more of the number of Common Shares (treating any Operating Partnership Units or Preferred Shares acquired by such purchaser or purchasers as if they had been converted to Common Shares) that would be outstanding if all of the Operating Partnership Units and Preferred Shares were converted into Common Shares;
Merger involving the Company if, immediately following the merger, the holders of the Company’s shares immediately prior to the merger own less than fifty percent (50%) of the surviving company’s outstanding shares having unlimited voting rights or less than fifty percent (50%) of the value of all of the surviving company’s outstanding shares; or
Majority of the members of the Company’s or the Operating Partnership’s, as applicable, Board of Directors are replaced during any twelve monthtwelve-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board prior to the date of the appointment or election.
Mr. Williams
Ms. Morrison
Sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (other than pursuant to internal reorganization) by the Operating Partnership or the Company of more than fifty percent50% of the total gross fair market value of its assets to a single purchaser or to a group of associated purchasers;
Acquisition of securities of the Company or the Operating Partnership in one or a related series of transactions (other than pursuant to an internal reorganization) by a single purchaser or a group of associated purchasers (other than the executive or any of his or her lineal descendants, lineal ancestors or siblings) which results in their ownership of 50% or more of the Common Shares (treating any Operating Partnership Units or Preferred Shares acquired by such purchaser or purchasers as if they had been converted to Common Shares) that would be outstanding if all of the Operating Partnership Units and Preferred Shares were converted into Common Shares; or
Majority of the members of the Operating Partnership’s Board of Directors are replaced during any twelve-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board prior to the date of the appointment or election.

52   

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement53




Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Good Reason

GOOD REASON

Generally under each employment agreement, the executive will have “Good Reason” to terminate his or her employment upon the occurrencetheoccurrence of any of the following events:

Name(s)     Applicable Definition of Good Reason
Mr. Tanger
Any material adverse change in job titles, duties, responsibilities, perquisites, or authority without his consent, including no longer reporting solely reporting to the Board of Directors of the Company;
Company or the failure to be the CEO of a successor entity (including its ultimate parent) on or following a Change of Control;
Principal duties are required to be performed at a location other than Greensboro, North Carolina andor Miami, Florida without his consent;
(a) Removal or non-election as a Directordirector of the Company; (or, on or
following a Change of Control, the successor entity (including its ultimate parent)) or as trustee of the general partner of the Operating Partnership; or
Material breach of the employment agreement by the Operating Partnership or the Company, including failure to pay compensation or benefits when due.

  Mr. Marchisello
  Mr. McDonough
Mr. Perry

Any material adverse change in job titles, duties, responsibilities, perquisites, or authority without his consent;
After a Change of Control, his principal duties are required to be performed at a location other than the Greensboro, North Carolina metropolitan area without his consent,
Election to terminate his employment within the 180-day period following a Change of Control; or
Material breach of the employment agreement by the Operating Partnership, including failure to pay compensation or benefits when due unless such failure is not cured within 30 days after written demand for payment.due.
Mr. Williams
Ms. Morrison
Operating Partnership materially fails to make payment of amounts due;
Operating Partnership commits a material breach of its obligations under the employment agreement; or
HerHis or her principal duties are required to be performed at a location other than the Greensboro, North Carolina metropolitan area without his or her consent following the occurrence of a Change of Control or certain other qualifying events.

DisabilityDISABILITY

Generally under each employment agreement, the executive will be deemed to have a “Disability” upon the occurrence of any of the followingthefollowing events:

Name(s)     Applicable Definition of Disability
Mr. Tanger
  Mr. Marchisello
  Mr. McDonough
Mr. Perry

The absence of the executive from the executive’s duties to the Operating Partnership and/or, as applicable, the Company on a full-time basis for a total of 16 consecutive weeks during any 12 month period as a result of incapacity due to mental or physical illness which is determined to be total and permanent by a physician selected by the Operating Partnership or, as applicable, the Company and acceptable to the executive or the executive’s legal representative (such agreement as to acceptability not to be unreasonably withheld).

Mr. Williams
Ms. Morrison

HerHis or her inability due to a physical or mental illness that is expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months, to perform any of the material duties assigned to him or her by the Operating Partnership for a period of ninety (90) days or more within any twelve consecutive calendar months.

Assumptions
54NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

ASSUMPTIONS

The employment contracts of the NEOs set forth in the tablebelow other than Mr. Tanger consider a Change of Control as aasa reason for an executive to terminate employment, and thus would entitle the executive to certain severance benefits. In addition, for purposes of the table below, however, we consider the caption representing the termination by the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason to exclude an event of a Change of Control. In addition, any severance benefits or additional compensation that these executives are eligible to receive upon termination will be reduced to the extent necessary to prevent the executive from having any liability forliabilityfor the federal excise tax levied on certain “excess parachute payments” under section 4999 of the Code. The amounts shown inshownin the table below are the maximum amounts the executives would be eligible to receive upon termination assuming no such reduction in compensation or benefits would be required.

The amounts shown below assume that such termination was effective December 31, 2015,2019, and thus amounts earned through such time are estimates of the amounts that would be paid out to the executives upon termination. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of such executive’s separation from the Company and/or the Operating Partnership.

Also considered in the table below is the estimated value of restricted Common Shares earned upon termination of employment or a Change of Control from the conversion of the notional units under the Company’s 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017 Outperformance Plans. Under such plans, notional units will convert into restricted Common Shares upon the satisfaction of certain share price appreciation conditionsofcertain TSR thresholds over a three yearthree-year performance period. Forperiod.For a further discussion of the plans, see “2015“2019 and 2020 Outperformance Plan”Plans” on page 36page36 in this Proxy Statement.

Upon a termination without Cause, for Good Reason, death or Disability, each

www.tangeroutlets.com   

   53




Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

notional unit will convert based upon the share price at the end of the three yearthree-year performance period, and the number of restricted Common Shares earned will equal a prorated portion of the restricted Common Shares that would have been earned had a termination not occurred (prorated based on the period of employment during the three-year performance period). Such restricted Common Shares will vest immediately upon issuance at the end of the three yearthree-year performance period. Upon a Change of Control (as defined in our Incentive Award Plan), the absolute share price appreciation (absolute TSR) targets will be reduced pro ratapro-rata based upon the period of time that the effective date of the plan to the date of the Change of Control bears to the three yearthree-year performance period, and each notional unit will convert based upon the share price as of the Change of Control, provided that the value of the restricted Common Shares received upon conversion shall not exceed the product of (a) the number of notional units held by the executive and (b) a stated amount per share included in each award agreement (which for the awards under the 2013 OPP, 2014 OPP and 2015 OPP equaled $42.04, $43.22 and 47.29 respectively).Control. Any restricted Common Shares earned will vest immediately upon issuance immediately prior to the Change of Control. If the notional units are earned, and thereby converted into restricted Common Shares, then award recipients will be entitled to receive a payment of all dividends and other distributions through the termination date or Change of Control that would have been paid had the number of earned restricted Common Shares been issued at the beginning of the performance period.

 NameCash
Severance
Payment
($)(1)
Share
Awards
($)(2)
Continuation
of
Benefits
($)(3)
All Other
Comp.
($)(4)
Total
($)
  Steven B. Tanger                                  
        Without Cause or For Good Reason$5,664,096$13,256,580       $7,794       $44,436        $18,972,906 
        Change of Control3,145,7703,145,770 
        Death1,888,04315,225,150 17,113,193 
        Disability1,888,04315,225,15044,43617,157,629 
        For Cause or without Good Reason— 
  Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
        Without Cause or For Good Reason$16,665,419$5,232,000$$$21,897,419 
        Change of Control16,665,4195,232,00021,897,419 
        Death or Disability908,7565,232,0006,140,756 
        For Cause or without Good Reason— 
  Thomas E. McDonough
        Without Cause or For Good Reason$5,125,446$4,538,760$$$9,664,206 
        Change of Control5,125,4464,538,7609,664,206 
        Death or Disability832,1114,538,7605,370,871 
        For Cause or without Good Reason — 
  Chad D. Perry
        Without Cause or For Good Reason$2,937,785$1,602,300$$$4,540,085 
        Change of Control2,937,7851,602,3004,540,085 
        Death or Disability784,3761,602,3002,386,676 
        For Cause or without Good Reason— 
  Lisa J. Morrison
        Without Cause or For Good Reason$538,351$725,940$$$1,264,291 
        Change of Control538,351538,351 
        Death or Disability405,146725,9401,131,086 
        For Cause or without Good Reason— 
WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM55


Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Name     Cash
Severance
Payment
($) (1)
     Share
Awards
($) (2)
     Continuation
of Benefits
($) (3)
     All Other
Comp.
($) (4)
     Total
($)
Steven B. Tanger
     Without Cause or For Good Reason$7,069,385$3,527,452$14,988$  67,344$10,679,169
Change of Control
Death2,356,4623,527,4525,883,914
Disability2,356,4623,527,45267,3445,951,258
For Cause or without Good Reason
James F. Williams
Without Cause or For Good Reason$678,032$474,615$$$1,152,647
Change of Control678,032678,032
Death or Disability706,176474,6151,180,791
For Cause or without Good Reason
Chad D. Perry
Without Cause or For Good Reason$4,834,058$731,197$$$5,565,255
Change of Control4,834,058731,1975,565,255
Death or Disability961,420731,1971,692,617
For Cause or without Good Reason
Lisa J. Morrison
Without Cause or For Good Reason$565,364$369,428$$$934,792
Change of Control565,364565,364
Death or Disability387,111369,428756,539
For Cause or without Good Reason
(1)The terms of the cash severance payments due each officer under each scenario are more fully described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the caption “Employment Contracts.”
(2)Amounts shown in this column include (1) the value of restricted Common Shares which were unvested at December 31, 20152019 and that would immediately vest upon termination of employment, and (2) in the case of Mr. Tanger, accrued dividends earned on unvested Performance Vesting Shares that would vest immediately upon termination of employment. This column excludes the value of restricted Common Shares that may be earned under the 20152019, 2018 and 2014 Outperformance Plans,2017 OPP, as no restricted Common Shares would have been earned under the planthese plans assuming (1) the Company’s share price at the end of the three year performance period is equivalent to the share price as of December 31, 20152019 and (2) dividends paid during the performance period remaining subsequent to December 31, 20152019 are paid at similar rates as in 2015.2019.
(3)Includes estimated costs of continuation of benefits for the remainder of Mr. Tanger’s employment contract for group medical and dental coverage, disability insurance and life insurance premiums on $100,000 of coverage.
(4)Represents estimated premiums on term life insurance policies for Mr. Tanger to be paid for the remainder of his employment contract.

54   

56

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy StatementNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT




Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership (as determined under the rules of the SEC) as of March 1, 2016, or such other date as indicated in the notes thereto, available to us with respect to2, 2020 of (a) our Common Shares, and of(b) units of partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (referred to as the “Units”) by (i) held by those persons known by us to be the beneficial owners(as determined under the rules of the SEC)owners of more than 5% of such shares and/or Units, (ii) held individually by theour directors and our named executive officers identified elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, and (iii) held by our directors and all of our executive officers as a group. We believe based on information provided to us, that each of the shareholders listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to shares beneficially owned by the shareholder unless noted otherwise, subject to community property laws where applicable.

  NameNumber of
Common
Shares
Beneficially
Owned(1)
Percent of
All
Common
Shares
Number of
Common
Shares
Receivable Upon
Exchange
of Units
Beneficially
Owned(2)
Percent of
All
Common
Shares
(including upon
exchange of
such owner’s
Units)
  Steven B. Tanger(3)                                                              
       Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.   
       3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360
       Greensboro, NC 27408902,528*2,858,3783.8%
  The Vanguard Group(4) 
       Vanguard REIT Index Fund
       100 Vanguard Blvd.  
       Malvern, PA 1935513,684,32114.2%13.8%
  BlackRock, Inc.(5)
       55 East 52nd Street
       New York, NY 1005510,138,15310.5%10.2%
  State Street Corporation(6) 
       One Lincoln Street
       Boston, MA 021118,675,3559.0%8.8%
  Morgan Stanley(7)
       1585 Broadway
       New York, NY 10036
  Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.
       522 Fifth Avenue 6th
       New York, NY 100365,663,7915.9%5.7%
  William G. Benton77,075**
  Jeffrey B. Citrin12,842**
  David B. Henry4,500**
  Thomas J. Reddin31,144**
  Thomas E. Robinson62,585**
  Bridget M. Ryan-Berman39,096**
  Allan L. Schuman72,096**
  Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.290,383**
  Thomas E. McDonough182,942**
  Chad D. Perry67,321**
  Lisa J. Morrison44,604**
  Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (17 persons)(8)1,985,0952.1%2,858,3784.9%

NameNumber of
Common
Shares
Beneficially
Owned (1)
Percent of
All Common
Shares (2)

Number of
Common
Shares
Receivable
Upon Exchange
of Units
Beneficially
Owned (3)

Percent of
All Common
Shares
(including upon
exchange of
such owner’s
Units)
Steven B. Tanger(4)
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360
Greensboro, NC 27408
     1,098,166     1.2%     2,716,808     4.0%
The Vanguard Group(5)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
15,292,19116.4%16.4%
BlackRock, Inc.(6)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
13,497,29014.5%14.5%
State Street Corporation (7)
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
4,789,4095.1%5.1%
William G. Benton94,399**
Jeffrey B. Citrin68,724**
David B. Henry46,400**
Thomas J. Reddin54,424**
Thomas E. Robinson82,485**
Bridget M. Ryan-Berman70,996**
Allan L. Schuman59,066**
Susan E. Skerritt20,677**
Luis A. Ubinas12,000**
James F. Williams97,268**
Thomas McDonough(8)159,652**
Chad D. Perry105,896**
Lisa J. Morrison52,522**
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (17 persons)(9)2,046,1332.2%2,716,8085.0%
*Less than 1%

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM57


Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

(1)

The ownership of Common Shares reported herein is based upon filings with the SEC and is subject to confirmation by us that such ownership did not violate the ownership restrictions in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation.


www.tangeroutlets.com   (2)

Based on 93,076,701 Common Shares and 2,716,808 Units outstanding as of March 2, 2020.

(3)

   55




Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

(2)Represents Common Shares that may be acquired upon the exchange of Units beneficially owned.owned by the applicable shareholder. Each exchangeable Unit of the Operating Partnership may be exchanged for one of our Common Shares.

(3)(4)

Includes 2,858,3782,716,808 Units of the Operating Partnership held by Tango 7, LLC. Mr. Tanger holds, directly and indirectly, all of the ownership interests in Tango 7, LLC and has sole voting and dispositive power of all such Common Shares and Units held by this entity. The Units of the Operating Partnership held by Tango 7, LLC are exchangeable into 2,858,3782,716,808 Common Shares of the Company. Excludes 1,353,4621,317,992 Common Shares and 599,996 Units of the Operating Partnership exchangeable into 599,996 Common Shares of the Company, which are held in various trusts of which Mr. Tanger is a beneficiary, but is not the trustee and does not otherwise have investment or voting control with respect to the securities held by such trusts. Includes indirect ownership of 5,000 Common Shares owned by his wife.

(4)(5)

We have received copies of a Schedule 13G/A as filed with the SEC on February 11, 20162020 by The Vanguard Group Inc. (referred to as “Vanguard”) reporting ownership of these Common Shares as of December 31, 2019. As reported by Vanguard in its Schedule 13G/A, (i) Vanguard has sole dispositive power for 15,013,704 shares, and shared dispositive power for 278,487 shares, and (ii) Vanguard has sole voting power for 288,488 shares and shared voting power for 100,062 shares.

(6)

We have received a copy of a Schedule 13G/A as filed with the SEC on February 9, 20164, 2020 by Vanguard REIT Index Fund (referred to as “REIT Fund”BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”), a client of Vanguard, reporting ownership of these Common Shares as of December 31, 2015.2019. As reported by Vanguard in itsthe Schedule 13G/A, (i) VanguardBlackRock has sole dispositive power for 13,535,550 shares, which includes shares owned by REIT Fund, and shared dispositive power for 148,771all 13,497,290 shares, and (ii) VanguardBlackRock has sole voting power for 214,151 shares and shared voting power for 76,80013,278,177 shares. As reported by REIT Fund in itson the Schedule 13G/A, REIT Fund has sole voting power for 6,904,138 shares.BlackRock is a parent holding company or control person in accordance with Rule 13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(G) under the Exchange Act. The aggregate amount of the Common Shares beneficially owned by BlackRock is on a consolidated basis and includes any shares held directly by BlackRock’s subsidiaries, as listed in Exhibit A to the Schedule 13G/A.

(7)
(5)

We have received a copy of a Schedule 13G/A as filed with the SEC on January 8, 2016 by BlackRock, Inc. reporting ownership of these Common Shares as of December 31, 2015. As reported in said Schedule 13G/A, (i) Blackrock has sole dispositive power for all 10,138,153 shares, and (ii) Blackrock has sole voting power for 9,512,264 shares.

(6)We have received a copy of Schedule 13G as filed with the SEC on February 16, 201610, 2020 by State Street Corporation (referred to as “State Street”) reporting ownership of these Common Shares as of DecemberJanuary 31, 2015.2020. As reported in saidthe Schedule 13G,13G/A, (i) State Street has shared dispositive power for all 8,675,3554,789,409 shares, and (ii) State Street has shared voting power for all 8,675,3553,865,523 shares.

(7)

(8)

We have received a copy of Schedule 13G as filed with the SEC

Mr. McDonough retired on February 11, 2016 by Morgan Stanley (referred to as “MS”) and Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Inc. (referred to as “MSIM”) reporting ownership of these Common Shares as of December 31, 2015. As reported in said Schedule 13G, (i) MS and MSIM each have shared dispositive power for all 5,663,791 shares, and (ii) MS and MSIM each have sole voting power for 4,298,167 shares and shared voting power for 617,821 shares.2019.

(8)(9)

Includes 2,858,3782,716,808 Common Shares which may be acquired upon exchange of 2,858,3782,716,808 Units of TPLP.the Operating Partnership. Includes 61,24117,266 Common Shares that were pledged as security for certain personal loans by persons other than Directors or NEOs prior to the adoption of our anti-pledging policy in 2015.NEOs.


58NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As of December 31, 2015,2019, the Company, through its ownership of the Tanger GP and Tanger LP Trusts, owned 95,880,82592,892,260 units of the Operating Partnership, and other limited partners (the “Non-Company LPs”) collectively owned 5,052,7434,911,173 Class A common limited partnership units. Each Class A common limited partnership unit held by the Non-Company LPs is exchangeable for one of the Company’s Common Shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company’s REIT status. Most of the Non-Company LPs are the descendants of Stanley K. Tanger, the Company’s founder (including Steven B. Tanger, the Company’sCompany's CEO), their spouses or former spouses or their children and/or trusts for their benefit.

During 2015, 25,6632019, 49,511 Class A common limited partnership units were exchanged for 25,66349,511 Common Shares of the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2019, the Non-Company LPs received quarterly distributions of earnings from the Operating Partnership totaling $6.6$7.0 million.

The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (referred to as the “Code of Conduct”), is posted on the Company’s website at www.tangeroutlets.com and is available by clicking on “INVESTOR RELATIONS”,RELATIONS,” then “CORPORATE OVERVIEW”“GOVERNANCE” and then “GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS” or by writing to our Corporate SecretaryatSecretary at our principal executive offices. The Code of Conduct applies to all of the Company’s directors, officers and employees and states that conflicts of interest should be avoided wherever possible. Conflicts of interest are broadly defined to include any situation where a person’s private interest interferes in any way with the interests of the Company. Any material transaction or relationship that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest should be discussed with the applicable Code of Ethics Contact Person. From time to time, the Company may waive the application of provisions of the Code of Conduct. Any such waiver involving conduct of officers or directors of the Company may be made only by the Board and must be promptly disclosed as required by the rules of the SEC or the NYSE. Any waiver with respect to the conduct of other employees may be made only by the CEO. We intend to post on our website all disclosures that are required by law or the NYSE listing standards concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of our Code of Conduct.

The Company’s Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures is posted on the Company’s website at www.tangeroutlets.com and is available by clicking on “INVESTOR RELATIONS”, then “CORPORATE OVERVIEW”“GOVERNANCE” and then “GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS” or by writing to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices. The Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures

56   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

requires the approval or ratification by the Audit Committee of any “related party transaction,” defined as any transaction, arrangement or relationship in which we were, are or will be a participant, the amount involved exceeds $100,000 and one of our executive officers, directors, director nominees, 5% shareholders, (or their immediate family members)members or individuals sharing the household of any of the foregoing or any entity with which any of the foregoing persons is an employee, general partner, principal or 5% shareholder, each of whom we refer to as a “related person,” has or will have a direct or indirect interest as set forth in Item 404 of Regulation S-K.interest. The policy provides that management must present to the Audit Committee for review and approval each proposed related party transaction (other than related party transactions involving compensation matters and certain ordinary course transactions). The Audit Committee must review the relevant facts and circumstances oftheof the transaction, including if the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’slengtharm’s-length dealings with an unrelated third party and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction, take into account the conflicts of interest and corporate opportunity provisions of our Code of Conduct, and either approve or disapprove the related party transaction. If advance approval of a related party transaction requiring the Audit Committee’s approval is not feasible, the transaction may be preliminarily entered into by management upon prior approval of the transaction by the chair of the Audit Committee, subject to ratification of the transaction by the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. No director may participate in approval of a related party transaction for which he or she is a related party.

www.tangeroutlets.com   WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

   57

59



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2 RATIFICATION OF
APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

In 2015, theThe Audit Committee conducted a comprehensive, competitive process to determine the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 for the Company. As a result of this process and following careful deliberation, the Audit Committeehas appointed the firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP to audit the accounts of the Company for the fiscal year ending on December 31, 20162020 and to perform such other services as may be required, and dismissed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP effective upon the issuance of its reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 for the Company to be included in the related Annual Report on Form 10-K.

required. The submission of the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of Deloitte & Touche LLPthis matter for approval by shareholders is not legally required; however, the Board of Directors believes that such submission is consistent with best practices in corporate governance and is an opportunity for shareholders to provide direct feedback to the Board of Directors on an important issue of corporate governance. If the shareholders do not approve the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the selection of such firm as our independent registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered. Even if the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP is ratified, the Audit Committee retains the discretion to select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company.

Deloitte & Touche LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. There are no affiliations between the Company and Deloitte & Touche LLP, its partners, associates or employees, other than its engagement as an independent registered public accounting firm for the Company. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders. A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will not be present at the meeting. See the “Report of the Audit Committee”,Committee,” included below, for information relating to the fees billed to the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopersDeloitte & Touche LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20152019 and 2014.2018.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. There are no affiliations between the Company and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, its partners, associates or employees, other than its engagement as an independent registered public accounting firm for the Company. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s audit reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principle. The audit reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on the Company’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 did not contain an adverse opinion, nor were they qualified or modified.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and the subsequent interim period through February 23, 2016, there were (i) no disagreements with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, any of which, if not resolved to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s satisfaction, would have caused PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to make reference thereto in their reports, and (ii) no “reportable events” within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

The Company provided PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with a copy of disclosures it made in both the Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016 and the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 11, 2015 (the “Form 8-K”), and requested that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP furnish a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agreed with the statements made in both such reports. A copy of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s letter dated March 1, 2016 was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on March 2, 2016, and a copy of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s letter dated September 11, 2016 was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Form 8-K.

58   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and the subsequent interim period through March 2, 2016, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted with Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that Deloitte concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, or (iii) any reportable event within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Vote Required.The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm will be approved if the votes cast for the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal, provided that a quorum is present. Accordingly, abstentions and Common Shares present at the meeting for any other purpose but which are not voted on this proposal will not affect the outcome of the vote on the proposal. Because brokers have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, we do not expect any broker non-votes in connection with the ratification.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF
THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS
THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.FIRM
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2020.


www.tangeroutlets.com   60

   59

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT



Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee has provided the following report:

During 2015,2019, we reviewed with the Company’s management, Director of Internal Audit and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopersDeloitte & Touche LLP, (referred to as “PwC”), the scope of the annual audit and audit plans, the results of internal and external audit examinations, the evaluation by PwCDeloitte & Touche LLP of the Company’s system of internal control, the quality of the Company’s financial reporting and the Company’s process for legal and regulatory compliance. We also monitored the progress and results of the testing of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Management is responsible for the Company’s system of internal control, the financial reporting process and the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an integrated audit and issuing reports and opinions on the following:

1.the Company’s consolidated financial statements; and
2.the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

As provided in our Charter, our responsibilities include monitoring and overseeing these processes.

Consistent with this oversight responsibility, the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to us. We appointed PwCDeloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 20152019 and approved the compensation of the firm. We reviewed and approved all non-audit services performed by PwCDeloitte & Touche LLP during 20152019 and determined that the provision of the services was compatible with maintaining PwC’sDeloitte & Touche LLP’s independence. During 2015,2019, we pre-approved certain specific non-audit servicesandservices and associated fees to be performed by PwC,Deloitte & Touche LLP, including (1) certain consultations regardingconsultationsregarding possible accounting and reporting implications of proposed transactions and of newly issued or proposed authoritative accounting pronouncements for which any one service would be $30,000 or less and (2) certain tax consulting services for which any one service would be $50,000 or less, and for all such services which would be less than $250,000 in the aggregate. In addition, we have delegated to the chairmanChair of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve other non-audit services to be performed by PwCDeloitte & Touche LLP and associated fees, provided thatand the chairmanChair reports all such decisions at the Audit Committee’s next regularly scheduled meeting.

We have received the written disclosures and letters from PwCDeloitte & Touche LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding PwC’sDeloitte & Touche LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, including independence with respect to tax services, and we discussed with PwCDeloitte & Touche LLP its independence.

We reviewed and discussed the 20152019 consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting with management and PwC.Deloitte & Touche LLP. We also discussed the certification process with the CEO and CFO. Management represented to us that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective. We discussed with PwCDeloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by statement on Auditing Standards No. 16, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.Board and the SEC.

Based on these discussions and reviews, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152019 for filing withfilingwith the SEC.

60   

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement61




Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The following is a summary of the fees billed to the Company for services in 2019 and 2018 by PwC for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:Deloitte & Touche LLP:

Type of Fees20152014

Description of Fees

      2019           2018     Description of Fees
Audit fees$806,000$761,300

The audit fees were for professional services rendered for the integrated audits of our consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting and the separate audits of one unconsolidated joint venture.

$903,000$841,000The audit fees were for professional services rendered for the integrated audits of our consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting.
Audit-related fees     23,000     92,500     

The audit-related fees included services related to documents filed with the SEC and, for 2014, services related to the issuance of a comfort letter.

25,00083,400The audit-related fees included services related to documents filed with the SEC, including an S-8 for 2019 and, for 2018, included services related to the new leasing standard, revenue recognition standard and our S-3 filing.
Tax fees-tax compliance and preparation fees212,221265,529

The tax fees were for tax compliance and preparation including tax return preparation and review.

Subtotal1,041,2211,119,329928,000924,400
Tax Fees-other38,93529,786

The tax fees-other were for tax planning, advice, and consulting.

All other fees
Subtotal38,93529,786
Total$1,080,156$1,149,115$928,000$924,400

The percentage ofThere were no tax fees andor tax fees-other approved pursuant to the pre-approved policies was 22%incurred during 20152019 and 31% during 2014.2018.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Jeffrey B. Citrin (Chair)
William G. Benton
David B. Henry
Thomas J. Reddin (Chair)
William G. Benton
Jeffrey B. Citrin
Thomas E. Robinson

Susan E. Skerritt
Luis A. Ubiñas

www.tangeroutlets.com   62

   61

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3 APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY VOTE ON
BASIS, OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are seeking advisory shareholder approval of the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the section of this proxy statement titled “Executive Compensation.” The Company has determined to hold a “say-on-pay”“Say-on-Pay” advisory vote every year and the next “say-on-pay” advisory vote will occur at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.year. In accordance with this determination and Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, shareholders are being asked to vote on the following advisory resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20162020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (which disclosure includes Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and any related material).”

Although the vote is advisory, and non-binding, the Board of Directors and the Compensation and Human Capital Committee will review the voting results in connection with their ongoing evaluation of the Company’s compensation program. The next “Say-on-Pay” advisory vote will occur at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

As described more fully in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, the Company’s compensation program is designed to reward both teamwork and the individual officer’s contribution to the Company with respect to annual and longer-termlonger term goals. The Company’s primary components of compensation for its executive officers have been base salary, annual incentive cash bonuses and long-term equity-based incentive compensation.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes that an executive compensation program that strongly links both the short-term and long-term performance of the Company and the compensation of our executive officers is a key driver of our long-term financial success.

The Company believes that our current executive compensation program represents a thoughtful, balanced program with a pay-for-performance structure that focuses on Company performance and reflects the feedback of our shareholders.

SAY-ON-PAY RESPONSIVENESS - CHANGES TO THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

At the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, approximately 93% of shareholders votes cast approved, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, of our executive compensation (commonly referred to as “Say-on-Pay”) and approximately 7% of votes cast voted against the Say-on-Pay proposal. This level of support was a significant increase from the 2018 vote, in which approximately 42% of votes were cast in favor of this proposal.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM

Focus on Company Performance:63



Table of Contents

Despite our significant achievements in 2015, the Compensation Committee recognized that the Company delivered a -8.15% TSR for 2015. Accordingly, the total direct compensation for the Chief Executive Officer (referred to as the "CEO") decreased by 9.7% from 2014 and decreased by a range of 4.9% to 9.6% from 2014 for the other named executive officers (referred to as the "NEOs"). Additionally, approximately 83%PROPOSAL 3 APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Say-On-Pay Approval Percentages Since 2015

The 2019 results occurred after we made changes to our incentive programs in February of 2019 following an extensive shareholder outreach effort, preceding the 2019 Annual Meeting, in order to better understand our investors’ views regarding our executive compensation programs. The outreach efforts were led by Mr. David Henry, the Chair of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee at that time, together with the Chair of the Board at that time, Mr. Thomas Reddin, along with the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s independent compensation consultant, FPL, and members of management (excluding the Chief Executive Officer). We reached out to our 24 largest institutional shareholders who collectively owned approximately 80% (and spoke with and received feedback from shareholders representing 60%) of our outstanding common shares. These discussions allowed us to solicit individualized shareholder feedback on our compensation program and practices.

While investors generally supported the overall design and framework of our executive compensation system and acknowledged the positive changes that have been made over the years, in light of recent declining share price performance, we heard concerns and received valuable feedback regarding the magnitude of the CEO’s equity grant, and the portion of that grant that was not performance-based.As we valued the feedback provided by our investors, the Board took action to specifically address their concerns while still maintaining a compensation program focused on retaining and motivating our executives.The Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes that the 2019 compensation changes described in the table below reflect our Board’s ongoing commitment to shareholder engagement and responsiveness.

What We HeardHow We Responded

The magnitude of the CEO's total compensation is variable, or at risk, subjectCEO’s grant does not align with peers, particularly in an environment of subpar performance.

We reduced the grant date fair value of the CEO’s 2019 equity grant by approximately 21% as compared to the Company’s performance results.
value of his 2018 equity grant.

Focus on Shareholder Engagement: During the past year, the Company engaged in significant shareholder outreach specific to named executive officer compensation. Not satisfied with just over 66% say-on-pay advisory approval at the 2015 annual shareholders’ meeting, the Company sought and obtained meaningful shareholder input on executive compensation and worked with its independent compensation consultant to change executive compensation accordingly. Specifically, we redesigned our equity compensation program under the Incentive Award Plan to increase the portion of equity awards that are performance based, and we changed our 2016 Outperformance Plan (referred to as the "2016 OPP") to reflect a 50/50 split between absolute and relative TSR hurdles. We are committed to ongoing shareholder engagement as partA higher allocation of the Company’s overall compensation philosophy.
CEO’s equity grant should be tied to performance-based vesting.

We increased the allocation of the 2019 award tied to performance by approximately 31%, as now a majority (60%) of the awarded grant date fair value is tied to performance (up from 46% in 2018)

Focus on Best Practices: In moves that the Company believes are reflectiveA lower allocation of best practices in executive compensation, the Company continued to include a mandatory three-year holding period on the CEO’s share grantsequity grant should be tied to time-based vesting.

We decreased the allocation of the 2019 award tied solely to service by approximately 26%, as now a minority (40%) of the awarded grant date fair value is tied solely to service (down from 54% in February 2015 and February 2016 following the applicable vesting date. Additionally, in February 2015, the Company adopted a robust anti-pledging policy that prohibits, subject to certain exceptions described under “Governance Policies Relating to Compensation-Anti-Pledging Policy” on page 40, our executive officers, directors and employees from pledging our securities as collateral for margin loans or other transactions that could raise potential risks to shareholder value.

In 2015, the Compensation Committee took into account a number of operational and financial factors in setting compensation, including our key achievements. Included in our key achievements, we:

completed the development of and opened four new Tanger outlet centers, which expanded our portfolio of properties by nearly 1.4 million square feet in 2015, a 10% increase;

increased our Adjusted Funds from Operations (referred to as “AFFO”) 13% over 2014;

grew our same center net operating income (referred to as “NOI”) 3.5%, marking the 11th consecutive year of same center NOI growth (with an average annual NOI growth of 3.8% over this 11-year period);2018).


62   

64

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy StatementNOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT




Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3 ADVISORY VOTE

PROPOSAL 3 APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The illustration below outlines the magnitude of the changes in the grant date fair value of CEO equity awards from 2018 to 2019. In addition, given the operating results and share price performance achieved in 2019, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee determined that the CEO’s equity compensation should not be increased in 2020 and kept the CEO’s equity compensation, in terms of both grant date value and mix of performance-based versus time-based, the same as 2019.

CEO 2018 Equity Awards

increased our blended average base rental rates on space renewed and releasedTotal LTI Award:
$4,598,606

=Performance-Based (46%)
$2,111,479
+Time-Based (54%)
$2,487,127
21% Decrease ($)4% Increase ($)41% Decrease ($)
CEO 2019 Equity AwardsTotal LTI Award:
$3,654,909
=Performance-Based (60%)
$2,192,945
+Time-Based (40%)
$1,461,964
No increase or change in
allocation from 2019-2020
===
CEO 2020 Equity AwardsTotal LTI Award:
$3,654,919
=Performance-Based (60%)
$2,192,949
+Time-Based (40%)
$1,461,970

2019 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

As of December 31, 2019, our TSR over the past ten and twenty years was 13% and 718%, respectively, and approximately 1,030% since going public. During 2019, we faced similar industry headwinds that many of our peers experienced, particularly related to several retailer bankruptcies and brand-wide restructurings, that resulted in its consolidated portfolio the Company recapturing approximately 198,000 square feet during the year. With strong leasing execution, we succeeded in accomplishing one of our key strategic goals of keeping our centers highly occupied with desirable tenants. This success,along with our enhanced marketing programs that focused on growing our loyalty program and highlighting the social element of shopping by conducting portfolio-wide experiential events throughout the year, we were able to achieve better than expected results for Same Center NOI, traffic and sales.

We are proud of these achievements as they point to our ability to strategically position the Company to withstand these current headwinds. Among other achievements in 2019, our executive officers and other dedicated employees led the Company to realize the following results:

Net IncomeNet income available to common shareholders was $0.93 per share, or $86.5 million, compared to $0.45 per share, or $42.4 million, for the prior year.
AFFO*AFFO available to common shareholders was $2.31 per share for the year ended December 31, 2019, or $226.1 million, compared to $2.48 per share, or $243.3 million, for the prior year.
Same Center NOI*Same Center NOI for the consolidated portfolio 22.4% during 2015,decreased 0.7% for the year ended December 31, 2019 due primarily to the impact of additional tenant bankruptcies, lease modifications and store closures.
Occupancy97.0% occupied consolidated portfolio at year-end 2019 (compared to 96.8% on December 31, 2018), marking the 39th consecutive year with year-end occupancy of 95% or greater.
Quarterly
Common Share
Cash Dividends
Raised dividend in February 2019 by 1.4% on an annualized basis to $1.42 per share, marking our 26thconsecutive annual dividend increase. Since becoming a public company in May 1993, the Company has paid a cash dividend each quarter and has increased its dividend each year.
Average Tenant
Sales
Average tenant sales productivity for the consolidated portfolio was $395 per square foot for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to 23.0%$385 per square foot in the comparable prior year period.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM65


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3 APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Same Center
Tenant Sales
Same center tenant sales performance for 2014;

the overall portfolio increased 1.5% for the period year December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018.

obtained a 97.5% year-end occupancy within our consolidated portfolio, higher than any other public mall REIT, and marking the 35th consecutive year that we have achieved a year-end occupancy rate at or above 95%;

Asset
Dispositions

completedSold four non-core properties and used the salenet proceeds of six non-core outlet centers, including$128.2 million to repay outstanding balances under our interest in a joint venture partnership that owned one non-core outlet center during 2015, and in January 2016, completed the saleunsecured lines of one additional non-core outlet center;

credit.

recorded a year-end debt to total market capitalization ratio of 32%; and

Interest Coverage
Ratio

maintained aMaintained strong interest coverage ratio which was 4.58of 4.3 and 4.5 times for 2015.

2019 and 2018, respectively.
Occupancy costOccupancy cost ratio for the trailing twelve months ended December 31, 2019 was 10.0%, lowest among the public mall REITs.
*AFFO and Same Center NOI are financial measures that the Company’s management believes to be important supplemental indicators of our operating performance and which are used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, but are not measures computed in accordance with GAAP. For a discussion of AFFO, and Same Center NOI including a reconciliation to GAAP, please see Appendix A.

As of December 31, 2019, we had reduced our total outstanding consolidated debt by approximately $143.1 million from the amount outstanding as of December 31, 2018. In addition, we had no amounts outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit, which provide for borrowings up to $600 million, and outstanding floating rate debt totaled approximately $11.4 million, representing less than 1% of total consolidated debt. Approximately 94% of our consolidated square footage was unencumbered. As of December 31, 2019, our outstanding debt had a weighted average interest rate of 3.5% and a weighted average term to maturity, including extension options, of approximately 5.5 years with no significant maturities until December 2023.

Thanks in part to these operational results, we were able to return additional value to our shareholders in 2019. We repurchased approximately 1.2 million Common Shares totaling $20.0 million during the year at a weighted average price of$16.52 per share, leaving approximately $80.0 million available under the existing share repurchase authorization at December 31, 2019. In January 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 0.7%, or $0.01 per share, increase in the annualized dividend on its Common Shares to $1.43 per share, marking the 27thconsecutive annual dividend increase.

Shareholders are urged to read theCompensation Discussionand Analysissection of this Proxy Statement, which discusses in detail how our compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy. For a discussion of AFFO and NOI, please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2016 beginning on page 60.

Vote Required.This non-binding advisory vote shallwill be approved if the votes cast for the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal. Accordingly, abstentions, broker non-votes and Common Shares present at the meeting for any other purpose but which are not voted on this proposal will not affect the outcome of the vote on the proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR, ON A NON-BINDING BASIS, THE APPROVAL OF
THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.


www.tangeroutlets.com   66

   63

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT



Table of Contents

OTHER MATTERS

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of the ownership and changes in the ownership (Forms 3, 4 and 5) with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. Officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of our Common Shares are required by the SEC’s regulations to furnish us with copies of all such forms which they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and any amendments thereto received by us for the year ended December 31, 2015, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that all Forms 3, 4 or 5 were filed timely, with the exception of one Form 4 reporting one transaction for each of Mr. Citrin and Mr. McDonough.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR THE 2017
2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Shareholder Proposals for Inclusion in the 2017 Proxy Statement

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION IN THE 2021 PROXY STATEMENT

Proposals of shareholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act intended to be presented at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 20172021 must be received by us no later than December 6, 2016.4, 2020. Such proposals must comply with the requirements as to formandform and substance established by thebythe SEC for such proposals in order to be included in our Proxy Statement. Proposals should be sent to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., 3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, North Carolina 27408, Attn: Corporate Secretary.

OTHER PROPOSALS AND SHAREHOLDER NOMINATIONS FOR DIRECTOR

Other Proposals and Shareholder Nominations for Director


Under our By-Laws, certain procedures are provided that a shareholder must follow to nominate persons for election as Directorsdirectors or to propose an item of business at an Annual Meeting of Shareholders that is not intended to be included in our Proxy Statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8. These procedures provide that nominations for Directordirector and/or an item of business to be introduced at an Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be submitted in writing to the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices. We must receive the notice of your intention to introduce a nomination or to propose an item of business not earlier than the close of business on the 120th 120thday and not later than the close of business on the 90th 90thday prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting.

For the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such nominations or proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary not earlier than the close of business on January 20, 201715, 2021 and not later than the close of business on February 19, 201714, 2021 in order to be considered at the 20172021 Annual Meeting.Meeting of Shareholders. If we do not receive notice during that time period, any such defective matters raised at the meeting will be disregarded and the persons named as proxies in the proxy materials relating to the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will use their discretion in voting the proxieswith respect to any such matters.disregarded. A shareholder’s notice to nominate a director ordirectoror bring any other business before the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must set forth certain information specified in our By-Laws.

If the date of the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after May 20, 2017,15, 2021, shareholders must submit such nominations or proposals not earlier than the close of business on the 120th 120thday prior to the meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th 90thday prior to the meeting or by the close of business on the 10th 10thday following the date on which public announcement of the date of the meeting is first made by us. In addition, with respect to nominations for directors, if the number of directors to be elected at the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is increased and there is no public announcement by us naming all of the nominees for director or specifying the size of the increased Board at least 70 days prior to May 20, 2017,15, 2021, notice will also be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it is delivered to the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices not later than the close of business on the 10th 10thday following the day on which such public announcement is first made by us.

64   

   Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

OTHER MATTERSSHAREHOLDER SUGGESTIONS FOR DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

Shareholder Suggestions for Director Nominations

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board will consider suggestions from shareholders for nominees for election as directors to be presented at the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The person proposing the nominee must be a shareholder entitled to vote at the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the suggestion must be made pursuant to timely notice. Shareholder suggestions for director nominees must be received between January 20, 201715, 2021 and February 19, 2017,14, 2021, and should include: (i) the candidate’s written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee andtoand to serve as a director if elected, (ii) the name and address of theofthe shareholder submitting the suggestion or beneficial owner on whose behalf the proposed candidate is being suggested for nomination, and (iii) the class and number of our shares owned beneficially and of record by the shareholder or beneficial owner submitting the suggestion. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates suggested by shareholders on the same terms as candidates selected by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM67


Table of Contents

OTHER MATTERS

BOARD COMMITTEE CHARTERS, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
GUIDELINES AND CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

Each of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation and Human Capital Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operateoperates under a written charterscharter adopted by the Board. The Board has also adopted written Corporate Governance Guidelines in accordance with listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to directors, management and employees of the Company. We have made availablemadeavailable copies of our BoardCommitteeBoard Committee Charters, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our website at www.tangeroutlets.com by first clicking on “INVESTOR RELATIONS”, then “CORPORATE OVERVIEW”“GOVERNANCE”, and then, “GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS”. Copies of these documents may also be obtained by sending a request in writing to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., 3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, North Carolina 27408, Attn: Corporate Secretary.

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

The SEC permits a single set of annual reports, proxy statements, and Noticesmaterials to be sent to any householdaddress at which two or more shareholders reside, if itreside. This delivery method is believed the shareholders are members of the same family.referred to as “householding.” Each shareholder would receive a separate voter instruction form if you havethe household received printed proxy materials. This procedure, referred to as householding, reduces the volume of duplicate information shareholders receive and reduces mailing and printing costs. Acosts.A number of brokerage firms have instituted householding. Only one copy of the Notice will be sent to certain beneficial shareholders who share a single address, unless any shareholder residing at that address gave contrary instructions.

Depending upon the practices of your broker, bank or other nominee, you may be required to contact themyour nominee directly to discontinue duplicate mailings to your household. If you wish to revoke your consent to householding,receive a separate copy of an annual report, Proxy Statement, or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee. If you hold Common Shares in your own name as a shareholder of record,householding will not apply to you. ExtraWe agree to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate set of proxy materials, as requested, to any shareholder at the shared address to which a single set of those documents was delivered. If you prefer to receive separate copies of anythe annual report, Proxy Statement information statement or Notice Regarding theof Internet Availability of Proxy Materials they may be obtained free of charge by calling our Investor Relations Department at (336) 834-6892 or sending your request to the attention of the Secretary of the Company at 3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, NC 27408.

If you are currently a shareholder sharing an address with another shareholder and wish to receive only one set of future proxy materials for your household, please contact the above phone number or address.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, including financial statements and schedules, but not including exhibits, as filed with the SEC, will be sent to any shareholder of record on March 18, 2020 without charge upon written request addressed to: Corporate Secretary, 3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, NC 27408.

A reasonable fee will be charged for copies of exhibits. You may also access this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K at http://www.edocumentview.com/SKT. You also may access our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 at www.tangeroutlets.com.

OTHER BUSINESS

We know of no other business which will come before the meeting for action. However, if any business other than that described in thethis Proxy Statement comes beforethebefore the meeting, the persons designated as proxies will have authority to vote in accordance with their best judgment with respect to such business.

www.tangeroutlets.com   68

   65

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT



Table of Contents

APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS AND RECONCILIATIONS OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

Funds From Operations (“FFO”) is a widely used measure of the operating performance for real estate companies that supplements net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP.  We determine FFO based on the definition set forthby the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), of which we are a member. In December 2018, NAREIT issued “NAREIT Funds From Operations White Paper - 2018 Restatement” which clarifies, where necessary, existing guidance and consolidates alerts and policy bulletins into a single document for ease of use. NAREIT defines FFO as net income/(loss) available to the Company’s common shareholders computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding (i) depreciation and amortization related to real estate, (ii) gains or losses from sales of certain real estate assets, (iii) gains and losses from change in control, (iv) impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity and (v) after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis.

FFO is intended to exclude historical cost depreciation of real estate as required by GAAP which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities and interest costs, providing perspectivenot immediately apparent from net income.

We present FFO because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance. In addition, a portion of cash bonus compensation to certain members of management is based on our FFO or Adjusted Funds From Operations (“AFFO”), which is described in the section below. We believe it is useful for investors to have enhanced transparency into how we evaluate our performance and that of our management. In addition, FFO is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is also widely used by us and others in our industry to evaluate and price potential acquisition candidates. NAREIT has encouraged its member companies to report their FFO as a supplemental, industry-wide standard measure of REIT operating performance.

FFO has significant limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

FFO does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

FFO does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and FFO does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and

Other companies in our industry may calculate FFO differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, FFO should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business or our dividend paying capacity. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using FFO only as a supplemental measure.

ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

We present AFFO as a supplemental measure of our performance. We define AFFO as FFO further adjusted to eliminate the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operating performance. These further adjustments are itemized in the table below. You are encouraged to evaluate these adjustments and the reasons we consider them appropriate for supplemental analysis. In evaluating AFFO you should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses that are the same as or similar to some of the adjustments in this presentation. Our presentation of AFFO should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.

We present AFFO because we believe it assists investors and analysts in comparing our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating performance. In addition, we believe it is useful for investors to have enhanced transparency into how we evaluate management’s performance and the effectiveness of our business strategies. We use AFFO when certain material, unplanned transactions occur as a factor in evaluating management’s performance and to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies, and may use AFFO when determining incentive compensation.

WWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM69


Table of Contents

APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS AND RECONCILIATIONS OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

AFFO has limitations as an analytical tool. Some of these limitations are:

AFFO does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

AFFO does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and AFFO does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;

AFFO does not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations; and

Other companies in our industry may calculate AFFO differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, AFFO should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using AFFO only as a supplemental measure.

PORTFOLIO NET OPERATING INCOME AND SAME CENTER NOI

We present portfolio net operating income (“Portfolio NOI”) and same center net operating income (“Same Center NOI”) as supplemental measures of our operating performance. Portfolio NOI represents our property level net operating income which is defined as total operating revenues less property operating expenses and excludes termination fees and non-cash adjustments including straight-line rent, net above and below market rent amortization, impairment charges and gains or losses on the sale of assets recognized during the periods presented. We define Same Center NOI as Portfolio NOI for the properties that were operational for the entire portion of both comparable reporting periods and which were not acquired or subject to a material expansion or non-recurring event, such as a natural disaster, during the comparable reporting periods.

We believe Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI are non-GAAP metrics used by industry analysts, investors and management to measure the operating performance of our properties because they provide performance measures directly related to the revenues and expenses involved in owning and operating real estate assets and provide a perspective not immediately apparent from net income, FFO or AFFO. Because Same Center NOI excludes properties developed, redeveloped, acquired and sold; as well as non-cash adjustments, gains or losses on the sale of outparcels and termination rents; it highlights operating trends such as occupancy levels, rental rates and operating costs on properties that were operational for both comparable periods. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI, and accordingly, our Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI may not be comparable to other REITs.

Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI should not be considered alternatives to net income (loss) or as an indicator of our financial performance since they do not reflect the entire operations of our portfolio, nor do they reflect the impact of general and administrative expenses, acquisition-related expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs, other non-property income and losses, the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, or trends in development and construction activities which are significant economic costs and activities that could materially impact our results from operations. Because of these limitations, Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI should not be viewed in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI only as supplemental measures.

70NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents






APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS AND RECONCILIATIONS OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Below is a reconciliation of net income to FFO available to common shareholders and AFFO available to common shareholders (in thousands, except per share amounts): (1)

     2019     2018     2017
Net income$92,728$45,563$71,876
Adjusted for:
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets - consolidated120,856129,281125,621
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets - unconsolidated joint ventures12,51213,31413,857
Impairment charges - consolidated37,61049,739
Impairment charges - unconsolidated joint ventures7,1809,021
Foreign currency loss from sale of joint venture property3,641
Gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities(43,422)(6,943)
FFO223,925245,077213,432
FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships(195)421(265)
Allocation of earnings to participating securities(1,991)(2,151)(1,943)
FFO available to common shareholders (1)$221,739$243,347$211,224
As further adjusted for:
Compensation related to director and executive officer terminations (2)4,371
Abandoned pre-development costs528
Recoveries from litigation settlement(1,844)
Make-whole premium due to early extinguishment of debt (3)34,143
Write-off of debt discount and debt origination costs due to early extinguishment of debt (3)1,483
Impact of above adjustments to the allocation of earnings to participating securities(35)(238)
AFFO available to common shareholders (1)$226,075$243,347$245,296
FFO available to common shareholders per share - diluted (1)$2.27$2.48$2.12
AFFO available to common shareholders per share - diluted (1)$2.31$2.48$2.46
Weighted Average Shares:
Basic weighted average common shares92,80893,30994,506
Effect of outstanding options and restricted common shares116
Diluted weighted average common shares (for earnings per share computations)92,80893,31094,522
Exchangeable operating partnership units4,9584,9935,027
Diluted weighted average common shares (for FFO and AFFO per share computations) (1)97,76698,30399,549
(1)Assumes the Class A common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership held by the noncontrolling interests are exchanged for common shares of the Company. Each Class A common limited partnership unit is exchangeable for one of the Company’s common shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company’s REIT status.
(2)For the year ended December 31, 2019, represents the accelerated recognition of compensation cost entitled to be received by the Company’s former President and Chief Operating Officer per the terms of a transition agreement executed in connection with his retirement on December 31, 2019.
(3)For the year end December 31, 2017, charges related to the redemption of our $300.0 million 6.125% senior notes due 2020.

   IMPORTANTWWW.TANGEROUTLETS.COM71


Table of Contents

APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS AND RECONCILIATIONS OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Below is a reconciliation of net income to Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI for the consolidated portfolio (in thousands):

     2019     2018
Net income$92,728$45,563
Adjusted to exclude:
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures(7,839)(924)
Interest expense61,67264,821
Gain on sale of assets(43,422)
Other non-operating (income) expense2,761(864)
Impairment charges37,61049,739
Depreciation and amortization123,314131,722
Other non-property expenses1,0491,001
Corporate general and administrative expenses53,88143,291
Non-cash adjustments (1)(6,237)(3,191)
Lease termination fees(1,615)(1,246)
Portfolio NOI313,902329,912
Non-same center NOI (2)(4,024)(17,900)
Same Center NOI$309,878$312,012
(1)Non-cash items include straight-line rent, above and below market rent amortization, straight-line rent expense on land leases and gains or losses on outparcel sales, as applicable.
(2)Excluded from Same Center NOI:

Outlet centers sold:
Nags Head, Ocean City, Park City, and WilliamsburgMarch 2019

72NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION   OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT



Electronic Voting InstructionsTable of Contents

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on May 20, 2016.

Vote by Internet
Go to www.envisionreports.com/SKT
Or scan the QR code with your smartphone
Follow the steps outlined on the secure website
Vote by telephone
Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone
Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message











Using ablack ink pen, mark your votes with anX as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.

   X   

Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!
You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card.

Votes submitted electronically must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on May 15, 2020.

Online
Go to www.envisionreports.com/SKT or scan the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below.

Phone
Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada

Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/SKT



Annual Meeting Proxy Card
▼ IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. ▼

 A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR all thedirector nominees listed in Proposal 1, andFOR Proposals 2 and 3.
1.Election of Directors:ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain
01 - William G. BentonForAgainstAbstain  ForAgainstAbstain 02ForAgainstAbstain
01 - Jeffrey B. Citrin0302 - David B. Henry
0403 - Thomas J. Reddin05 - Thomas E. Robinson06 - Bridget M. Ryan-Berman
07 - Allan L. Schuman08 - Steven B. Tanger

04 - Bridget M. Ryan-Berman05 - Susan E. Skerritt06 - Steven B. Tanger
ForAgainstAbstain
2.  To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.
3.To approve, on a non-binding basis, named executive officer compensation.07 - Luis A. Ubiñas

   ForAgainstAbstain      ForAgainstAbstain
2.

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.

3.

To approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, named executive officer compensation.

 
4.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement(s), continuation(s), or adjournment(s), thereof.

 

 

4.   B To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement(s), continuation(s) or adjournment(s) thereof.


 B   Non-Voting Items
Change of Address— Please print new address below.
 C Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — DatePlease date and Sign Belowsign below.

Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
 /       /        

                      02AJDB



Table of Contents











Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held May 15, 2020
at our Corporate Office, 3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, NC 27408
at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time
and virtually via the internet at www.meetingcenter.io/287143514.

To access the virtual meeting, you must have the information that is printed in the shaded bar located
on the reverse side of this form.

The password for this meeting is SKT2020.

Small steps make an impact.
Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic
delivery, sign up at www.envisionreports.com/SKT


▼ IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. ▼

Proxy — Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.

Appointment of Proxy for Annual Meeting on May 20, 201615, 2020

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned shareholder of TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC., a North Carolina corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints Steven B. Tanger and Chad D. Perry, and each of them, proxies with full power of substitution to act for the undersigned and to vote the shares which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of such corporation on May 20, 2016,15, 2020, and at any postponement(s), continuation(s) or adjournment(s) thereof, as instructed on the reverse side upon the proposals which are more fully set forth in the Proxy Statement of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. dated April 5, 20163, 2020 (receipt of which, or access to, is acknowledged) and in their discretion upon any other matters as may properly come before the meeting, including but not limited to, any proposal to adjourn, postpone or continue the meeting. Any appointment of proxy heretofore made by the undersigned for such meeting is hereby revoked.

In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote (x) for the election of any person to the Board of Directors if any nominee named herein becomes unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, (y) on any matter that the Board of Directors did not know would be presented at the Annual Meeting by a reasonable time before the proxy solicitation was made and (z) on such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or at any adjournments, continuations, or postponements thereof.

TheWhen this proxy is properly executed, the shares represented hereby will be voted in accordance with the directions given in this appointment of proxy. If not otherwise directed herein, shares represented by this proxy will be voted FOR all director nominees listed in Proposal 1, and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.

PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE ENCLOSED.


CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE.

 C Non-Voting Items

Change of Address — Please print new address below.